The Financial Implications of Pancreatic Surgery: The Hospital Is the Big Winner, Not the Surgeon!

Background: High-volume pancreatic surgery centers require a significant investment in expertise, time, and resources to achieve optimal patient outcomes. A detailed understanding of the economics of major pancreatic surgery is limited among many clinicians and hospital administrators. A greater consideration of these financial aspects may in fact have implications for enhancing clinical care and for a broader sustainability of high-volume pancreatic surgery programs. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), total pancreatectomy, or distal pancreatectomy at one academic medical center during the fiscal year 2021 were evaluated. Detailed hospital charges and professional fees were obtained for patients using the Qlik perioperative database. Clinical data for the study cohort were gathered from a prospectively maintained, IRB-approved pancreatic surgery database. Charges for the 91-day perioperative period were included. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: During the study period, 159 evaluable patients underwent 1 of 3 designated pancreatic resections included in the analysis. Ninety-seven patients (61%) were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and 70% (n = 110) underwent PD. The total charges (combined professional and hospital charges) for the cohort encompassing the entire perioperative period were $20,661,759. The median charge per patient was $130,306 (interquartile range [IQR], $34,534). The median direct cost of care was $23,219 (IQR, $6321) and the median contribution margin per case was $10,092 (IQR, $22,949). The median surgeon professional fee charges were $7700 per patient (IQR, $1296) as compared to $3453 (IQR, $1,144) for professional fee receipts (45% of the surgeon charge). The differences between the professional fee charges and receipts per patient were also considerable for other health care professionals such as anesthesiologists ($4945 charges vs $1406 receipts [28%]) and pathologists ($3035 charges vs $680 receipts [22%]). The surgeon professional fees were only 6% of the total charges, while the professional fees for anesthesiology and pathology were 4% and 2% of the total charges, respectively. Supply charges were 3% of the total charges. Longer operative time was correlated with increased hospital and anesthesia charges, without a significant increase in surgeon charges (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.2, respectively). Male sex, diabetes, and low serum albumin correlated with greater total hospital charges (P = 0.01, P = 0.01, and P = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: The role of the surgeon in the perioperative clinical care of major pancreatic resection patients is crucial and important and is by no means limited to the operative day. Nevertheless, in the context of the current US health care system, the reimbursement to the surgeon in the form of professional fees is a relatively small fraction of the total health care receipts for these patients. This imbalance necessitates a substantial financial partnership between hospitals and their pancreatic surgery units to ensure the long-term viability of these programs.

Major Pancreatic Resection Increases Bone Mineral Density Loss, Osteoporosis, and Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether long-term survivors of pancreatic surgery show increased risk to develop impaired bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and vitamin D deficiency. BACKGROUND: Pancreatic resection poses a risk for malabsorption of fat-soluble vitamins and other micronutrients essential for bone mineralization. Here, we evaluated the long-term effects of pancreatic resection on bone mineral density (BMD) and its clinical sequelae. METHODS: This was a two-pronged analysis of post-pancreatectomy patients with a follow-up period greater than 3 years comprising (1) a large, propensity score-matched, cohort study based on a multinational federated research network (FRN) and (2) a retrospective single institution review of clinical and radiographic patient data. In the FRN analysis, an initial cohort of 8,423 post-pancreatectomy patients were identified and propensity score-matched with normal controls. The primary endpoint was the 10-year risk of developing osteoporotic pathological fractures and secondary endpoints included diagnosis of osteoporosis, vitamin-D deficiency, and related therapies. The single institution retrospective analysis identified 224 patients who underwent pancreatic resection between 2005 and 2019. BMD was quantified in CT images acquired before and after surgery. BMD trends and related factors were assessed in a time-series mixed effect linear regression model. RESULTS: A total of 8,080 propensity score-matched pairs were included in the FRN analysis. The analysis revealed a 2.4-fold increase in pathological fractures (P<0.0001) and 1.4-1.5 fold increase in osteoporosis/osteomalacia (P<0.0001) and vitamin-D deficiency (P<0.0001) in post-pancreatectomy patients. Vitamin-D supplements were more common in the pancreatectomy group (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.28-1.53, P<0.0001), as were specific osteoporosis/osteomalacia treatments such as calcitonin, denosumab, romosozumab, abaloparatide, and teriparatide (OR 2.24, 95%CI 1.69-2.95, P<0.0001). Retrospective analysis of CT imaging revealed that BMD declined more rapidly following pancreatic resection compared to normal historical controls (P=0.015). Older age, pancreatic cancer, and pancreaticoduodenectomy were associated with increased rates of BMD loss (P<0.05, each). CONCLUSIONS: After pancreatic resection, patients are at higher risk for BMD loss and subsequent fractures. As the cohort of pancreatic resection survivorship grows, attention will need to be paid to focused prevention efforts to reduce BMD loss, osteoporosis, and fractures in these vulnerable patients, with specific attention to the pancreatic cancer population.

Hypercapnic Tissue Gene Expression and Survival in Early-Stage Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and lethal cancer. Hypercapnic tumor microenvironments were previously shown to promote cancer chemoresistance. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of tissue hypercapnia on PDAC prognosis. STUDY DESIGN: PDAC cancer-cell lines were cultured in normocapnic (5% CO 2 ) and hypercapnic conditions (10% CO 2 ). RNA was extracted, and whole-exome transcriptome was sequenced. Differentially expressed genes were identified and used to construct a "hypercapnic gene set." PDAC transcriptomic patient data from the Tumor Cancer Genome Atlas was used to calculate single-sample gene set enrichment scores based on each patient's tissue expression of the hypercapnic gene set. Tissue hypercapnic scores (HSs) in PDAC patients (TMN stages Ia-IIb) were determined and correlated with clinicopathological parameters and overall survival. RESULTS: A cohort of 135 resected stage I-II PDAC patients were assessed in this study. The average age was 65 ± 11.0 years, and the male:female ratio was 74:61. Median overall survival was 19.5 ± 1.4 months. High HSs were associated with increased tumor stage (p < 0.05) and higher lymph-node ratio (p < 0.05). In active smokers, high HS also correlated with smoking pack-years (p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed high HS to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, p = 0.004), along with lymph-node ratio (HR 4.2, p = 0.002) and age at diagnosis (HR 2.63, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The pancreatic tumor microenvironment plays an integral role in tumor aggressiveness, and our previous in vitro data suggest that hypercapnia promotes an aggressive, more resistant phenotype. Herein, we show that in early-stage pancreatic cancer, hypercapnic tissue signatures corresponded with a worse overall survival.

Distress, Depression, and the Effect of ZIP Code in Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Patients and Their Significant Others.

BACKGROUND: Distress screening of cancer patients is mandated by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Clinical implementation remains limited, particularly in surgical oncology settings in individuals with pancreaticobiliary cancers. STUDY DESIGN: This study evaluated differences in mean distress scores based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer & Problem List for patients with pancreaticobiliary cancers, benign pancreatic conditions, and for their significant others (SOs). The distress screening was conducted at the first office visit and postoperatively in a subset of those who had surgery. Distress Thermometer (DT) scores were dichotomized at ≤5 vs >5 and at ≥7 and correlated with Problem List items. The US ZIP Code database was used to correlate income range, percent poverty, and unemployment in the patient's self-identified ZIP code. Regression models were fitted to identify independent predictors of distress. RESULTS: A total of 547 patients and 184 SOs were evaluated. Thirty percent of patients had DT scores >5, with pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients reporting the highest levels of distress. SOs of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients reported even greater distress than the patients themselves. As the number of pre-existing medical problems increased; so did DT scores. Distress correlated with physical and emotional problems and worry about insurance coverage and transportation. Higher income level predicted higher DT scores, although poverty predicted lower DT scores. Depression was present in 12% of the patients. Distress improved in those undergoing surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Distress and depression in pancreaticobiliary cancer patients and SOs are prevalent. The findings of this study have multiple actionable implications and require diagnosis, treatment, and referral to supportive care resources.

Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (EDKA) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: An under-recognized metabolic abnormality with outcome implications.

BACKGROUND: Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis is a metabolic condition characterized by relative euglycemia, ketonemia, and metabolic acidosis that occurs through mechanisms resembling starvation. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex abdominal operation that subjects patients to a prolonged fasting and an inflammatory state. This study examined the incidence of euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis and potential opportunities for early diagnosis and management in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of 350 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2017 and 2020 was performed. Primary endpoints were peak beta-hydroxybutyrate levels, peak lactate levels, lowest pH, peak base deficits, and urinary output within the first 24 hours, postoperatively. Additional endpoints included incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, total complications, postoperative hospital length of stay, readmission rates, and changes in insulin regimen at discharge. RESULTS: Of the 350 cases reviewed, 39 (11.1%) patients developed euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis. Male sex and pancreatic cancer were associated with a risk for euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (P < .05). Patients with euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis had significantly higher peak beta-hydroxybutyrate levels than patients without euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (mean difference = 19.8 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval = 14.7-24.9, P < .001), and were nearly four times more likely to require insulin at discharge (odds ratio 3.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.1-13.0, P < .05). CONCLUSION: This is the first large descriptive study that investigates euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with significantly higher beta-hydroxybutyrate levels and new or increased insulin requirement at discharge. Our study demonstrates potential markers for euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy, offering an opportunity to identify and successfully treat this disease in a timely manner.

A Sub-Type of Familial Pancreatic Cancer: Evidence and Implications of Loss-of-Function Polymorphisms in Indoleamine-2,3-Dioxygenase-2.

BACKGROUND: Variation in an individual's genetic status can impact the development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; however, the majority of familial pancreatic cancers (FPC) cannot yet be attributed to a specific inherited mutation. We present data suggesting a correlation between loss-of-function single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in an immune regulator gene, indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase-2 (IDO2), and an increased risk of FPC. STUDY DESIGN: Germline DNA from patients who underwent resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 79) was sequenced for the IDO2 SNPs R248W and Y359Stop. Genotypes resulting in inactivation of IDO2 (Y325X homozygous, R248W homozygous) were labeled as homozygous, and the other genotypes were grouped as wild-type or heterozygous. Genotype distributions of each SNP were analyzed for Hardy-Weinberg deviation. A genotype frequency set from the 1000 Genomes Project (n = 99) was used as a genetic control for genotype distribution comparisons. RESULTS: A significant 2-fold increase in the overall prevalence of the Y359Stop homozygous genotype compared with the expected Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was noted (p < 0.05). Familial pancreatic cancer was noted in 15 cases (19%) and comparison of the FPC cohort set to the genetic control set showed a 3-fold increase in Y359Stop homozygous rates (p = 0.054). Overall in our cohort, the homozygous genotype group was associated with increased risk of FPC (odds ratio 5.4; 95% CI 1.6 to 17.6; p < 0.01). Sex, age at diagnosis, and history of tobacco use were not found to be significantly associated with FPC. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggest a strong association between the IDO2 inactivating Y359Stop SNP and an increased risk of FPC when compared with the control group. Future studies will evaluate the value of IDO2 genotyping as a prognostic, early detection marker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and a predictive marker for novel immune checkpoint therapies.