Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Laryngoscope ; 132(2): 287-289, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34287907

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Prone positioning is frequently used in patients intubated for COVID-19-related lung injury to improve oxygenation. At our institution, we observed severe tongue edema develop in some of these patients. Hence, we sought to determine the incidence of tongue edema in this cohort and whether prone positioning was a risk factor associated with this complication. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A single-system retrospective cohort study of patients intubated for respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 who subsequently developed clinically notable tongue edema from March 13 to July 5, 2020. RESULTS: 260 patients were intubated for COVID-19-related respiratory failure during the study period. 158 patients (60.8%) underwent at least one episode of proning. Twelve patients in total (4.6%) developed clinically significant tongue edema. Eleven of the twelve patients (91.7%) who developed tongue edema underwent proning prior to the development of edema. Prone positioning was associated with an increased incidence of tongue edema (odds ratio [OR] 7.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-59.46, P = .027). In all proned patients who developed edema, this complication was noted during proning or shortly after supination (range, 0-4 days). Tongue edema was primarily managed with conservative measures; one patient required tracheostomy for definitive management. CONCLUSIONS: Tongue edema appears to develop in a subset of patients with COVID-19 who are intubated. It appears to be associated with prone positioning but is likely multifactorial in nature. Further investigation into its incidence and pathophysiology is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:287-289, 2022.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Glositis/etiología , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Posicionamiento del Paciente/efectos adversos , Posición Prona , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Lengua/patología
2.
Laryngoscope ; 131(7): E2139-E2142, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33389768

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to determine the incidence of facial pressure injuries associated with prone positioning for COVID-19 patients as well as to characterize the location of injuries and treatments provided. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 263 COVID-19 positive patients requiring intubation in the intensive care units at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and MedStar Washington Hospital Center between March 1st and July 26th, 2020. Information regarding proning status, duration of proning, presence, or absence of facial pressure injuries and interventions were collected. Paired two-tailed t-test was used to evaluate differences between proned patients who developed pressure injuries with those who did not. RESULTS: Overall, 143 COVID-19 positive patients required proning while intubated with the average duration of proning being 5.15 days. Of those proned, 68 (47.6%) developed a facial pressure injury. The most common site involved was the cheek with a total of 57 (84%) followed by ears (50%). The average duration of proning for patients who developed a pressure injury was significantly longer when compared to those who did not develop pressure injuries (6.79 days vs. 3.64 days, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Facial pressure injuries occur with high incidence in patients with COVID-19 who undergo prone positioning. Longer duration of proning appears to confer greater risk for developing these pressure injuries. Hence, improved preventative measures and early interventions are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2139-E2142, 2021.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Dermatosis Facial/etiología , Traumatismos Faciales/etiología , Posicionamiento del Paciente/efectos adversos , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Posición Prona , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Head Neck ; 43(1): 247-254, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32959950

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Single-institution studies suggest that aspirin reduces the risk of death in head and neck cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of aspirin use on overall survival (OS) in veterans with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS: A total of 23 083 veterans with OPC were identified between 2005 and 2018 from the Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse. Records were queried for clinical-demographic data, aspirin prescriptions, and outcomes. Three-year OS was estimated. A Cox model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for aspirin use. RESULTS: Among the 23 083 identified veterans, 17 206 veterans met inclusion criteria. 21.8% used aspirin. Three-year OS was prolonged for aspirin users (66%) compared to nonaspirin users (54%; P < .001). Adjusted HR for death for nonaspirin users was 1.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) [1.60-1.91]). The average treatment effect of aspirin on survival using inverse probability weighting was 10% (95% CI [0.08-0.11]). CONCLUSION: Aspirin use following OPC diagnosis was independently associated with improved 3-year OS among veterans nationwide.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Veteranos , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...