Neuropeptide AF differentially affects anorexia in lines of chickens selected for high or low body weight.

The recently discovered anorectic effect of neuropeptide AF (NPAF) has not been studied in hypo-and hyperphagia animal models. The present study was designed to examine possible differences in appetite-related effects after central NPAF administration in lines of chickens that had undergone long-term divergent selection for low (LWS) or high (HWS) body weight and exhibit hypo- and hyperphagia, respectively. LWS chicks responded at a similar magnitude of food intake reduction to all doses of NPAF tested at all observation times. HWS chicks had an increased latency (150 min versus 30 min post injection) and an increased dose threshold of response (8 nmol versus 2 nmol) than LWS chicks. Water intake of LWS chicks was reduced in all doses tested at all observation times, whereas HWS chicks responded to the three doses of NPAF tested up to 60 min post injection, after which the decrease was sustained only at a dose of 8 nmol. In a comprehensive behaviour analysis, exploratory pecks, food pecks and locomotion were significantly reduced in both lines by NPAF, whereas sit time was increased in both lines. Other behaviours, including stand time, deep rest time and escape attempts, were not affected. These data suggest that the threshold of NPAF-induced anorexia is lower in LWS than HWS chicks and that NPAF-induced anorexia is a primary effect in both lines, and also support the hypothesis that differences exist in the central NPAF system between hypo- and hyperphagic individuals.

The anorectic effect of neuropeptide AF is associated with satiety-related hypothalamic nuclei.

Neuropeptide AF (NPAF), a member of the RFamide family, is encoded by the same gene as neuropeptide FF (NPFF), which causes short-term anorexia. However, reports on the role of NPAF on appetite-related process are lacking. Thus, i.c.v. injections of 4.0, 8.0 and 16.0 nmol NPAF were administered to chicks to observe its effect on food and water intake. Chicks treated with 8.0 and 16.0 nmol i.c.v. NPAF decreased both their food and water intake. Additionally, all doses of NPAF injected caused a similar reduction in whole blood glucose concentration 180 min after injection. In a second experiment, chicks that received i.c.v. NPAF had an increased number of c-Fos immunoreactive cells in the dorsomedial, paraventricular (magnocellular and parvicellular parts) and ventromedial nuclei. The arcuate nucleus and lateral hypothalamic area were not affected. In a third experiment, NPAF-treated chicks exhibited fewer feeding pecks and spent less time perching, whereas they spent an increased time in deep rest. Other behaviours, including exploratory pecking, escape attempts, defecations, distance moved, and time spent standing, sitting and preening, were not affected by NPAF injection. We conclude that NPAF causes anorectic effects that are associated with the hypothalamus.