Evaluating Adherence to Guideline-based Injury Grading in Pediatric Renal Trauma: How Are Patients Being Worked Up Prior to Transfer to a Level 1 Trauma Center?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether children with renal trauma who are transferred to a level I trauma center (TC) receive appropriate imaging studies before transfer and whether this impacts care. The American Urologic Association (AUA) Urotrauma guidelines state clinicians should perform IV contrast-enhanced CT with immediate and delayed images when renal trauma is suspected. Adherence to these guidelines in pediatric patients is unknown. METHODS: Children treated for renal trauma at our TC between 2005 and 2019 were identified. Comparisons between patients with initial imaging at a transferring hospital (TH) and patients with initial imaging at our TC were performed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the included 293 children, 67% (197/293) were transferred into our TC and 61% (180/293) received initial imaging at the TH. Patients with initial imaging at the TH were more likely to have higher-grade renal injuries (P = .001) and were less likely to have guideline-recommended imaging (31% vs 82%, P < .001). Of patients who were imaged at the TH, 28% (50/180) underwent an additional CT imaging shortly after transfer. When imaging was incomplete at the TH, having an additional scan upon transfer was associated with emergent urologic surgery (P = .004). CONCLUSION: Adherence to the AUA Urotrauma guidelines is low, with most pediatric renal trauma patients not receiving complete staging with delayed-phase imaging before transfer to a TC. Furthermore, patients initially imaged at THs were more likely to receive more CT scans per admission and were exposed to higher amounts of radiation. There is a need to improve imaging protocols for complete staging of renal trauma in children before transfer.

Short term reoperation rates after artificial urinary sphincter placement in pediatric patients.

INTRODUCTION: Artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) have demonstrated good functional outcomes in pediatric populations. We sought to examine the nationwide short term reoperation rates in pediatric patients after AUS placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational cohort study was designed utilizing claims from the Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database from 2007 to 2018. Patients under 18 years of age undergoing an AUS procedure were identified using CPT and ICD9/10 codes. Reoperations included any removal, replacement, or AUS placement codes which occurred after the initially identified placement code. Follow up time was the amount of time between AUS placement and the end of MarketScan enrollment. RESULTS: From 2007-2018, we identified 57 patients under the age of 18 who underwent AUS placement and after excluding 8 for concurrent AUS complication procedure codes and 4 for follow up < 60 days, the final cohort included 45 patients. The median age was 13 years (IQR 9-16 years) at the time of AUS placement, and the median follow up time after AUS placement was 787 days (IQR 442-1562 days), approximately 2.2 years. Total reoperation rate was 22%. Reoperations included 40% device removals (4/10) and 60% replacements (6/10). Neither gender (p = 0.70) nor age (p = 0.23) was associated with need for reoperation. Patients who had a concurrent bladder surgery had a higher rate of undergoing reoperation (50% vs. 12%, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of reoperation after AUS placement approached 1 in 4 in pediatric patients. These data may be instrumental for providers and parents in counseling and decision-making regarding risks of prosthetic implantation.