Gender and Racial Diversity Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Departments and Gynecologic Oncology Divisions in Canada: Are We There Yet?

OBJECTIVES: Gender and racial diversity in academic Canadian departments of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) have not been previously described. We examined gender representation in leadership in academic OBGYN departments and gynecologic oncology (GO) divisions, and determined factors predictive of leadership and promotion including racialized status. METHODS: This cross-sectional study of Canadian residency-affiliated academic OBGYN departments queried institutional websites in January 2021 to compile a list of academic faculty. Subjective gender was assessed using photographs and pronouns, and racialized status was determined using photographs. Logistic regression analyses determined predictive factors for leadership roles. Fassiotto et al. rank equity indices (REI) and Hofler et al. representation ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Within 16 Canadian institutions there were 354 (33.6%) men and 699 (66.4%) women, with 18.3% racialized faculty. Men were more likely to reach full professorship (P < 0.00001) and leadership positions of department chair, vice-chair or division head (P = 0.01). Representation ratios for women in OBGYN were <1 for all administrative leadership positions, and pairwise comparisons of the probability of promotion for women OBGYNs using REI reveal significant disparities between senior and junior administrative leadership and professorial ranks. Racialized physicians were less likely to have attained full professorship (P = 0.002). Ninety-seven academic GOs were identified: 68 (70.1%) were women, 17 (17.5%) racialized. Seven GO divisions (44%) had no racialized members. On multivariate analysis, only year of completion of fellowship was predictive of leadership. CONCLUSION: In academic Canadian OBGYN departments women are underrepresented in leadership and full professor positions. Racialized faculty are underrepresented in full professorship.

The use of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography to assess anastomotic perfusion following bowel resection in surgery for gynecologic malignancies - A report of 100 consecutive anastomoses.

OBJECTIVE: Real-time intraoperative assessment of anastomotic perfusion with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is a recent technique that is found to assist intraoperative decision-making and decrease risk of anastomotic leak in the General Surgery literature. No studies to date evaluate its use in Gynecologic Oncology. Our objectives were to assess the safety and feasibility of ICG-FA use and to describe the intraoperative assessment of anastomotic perfusion with ICG-FA. METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospectively-collected database of patients with a gynecologic malignancy who underwent a bowel resection at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada, between November 1, 2017 and December 15, 2019 was conducted. ICG-FA was administered intravenously, and a near infrared imaging system (Pinpoint, Novadaq, Canada; SPY-PHI, Stryker, USA) was used to objectively assess bowel perfusion. RESULTS: ICG-FA was used to assess a total of 100 bowel anastomoses in 82 consecutive surgeries: 56 low anterior resections, 19 small bowel resections, 15 right hemi-colectomies, 6 left hemi-colectomies, 3 transverse colectomies, and 1 total colectomy. Fifty-five end-to end, 44 side-to-side and 1 end-to-side anastomoses were assessed. ICG angiography was successful in all patients, allowing complete visualization of anastomotic perfusion in all cases. Hypoperfusion detected by ICG-FA resulted in change in operative plan for three patients (two anastomotic revisions and one diverting ileostomy). There were no adverse reactions to ICG. In this cohort, there was one postoperative anastomotic leak. CONCLUSIONS: ICG-FA enables objective and accurate intraoperative evaluation of anastomotic perfusion in surgeries for gynecologic malignancies. Its implementation and routine use were found to be safe and well-tolerated without side effects in our study cohort. ICG-FA can be used with other risk-assessment strategies to guide operative decision-making in Gynecologic Oncology.

Uterine Clear Cell Carcinoma: Does Adjuvant Chemotherapy Improve Outcomes?

OBJECTIVES: Women with uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC) are at high risk of relapse. Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is often recommended, although its effectiveness remains controversial. Our objective was to evaluate treatment-related outcomes of patients with UCCC, particularly those treated with adjuvant CT. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients diagnosed with UCCC at 2 academic cancer centers from 2000 to 2014 were included. Clinical, surgical, and pathological data were collected. Survival estimates were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log rank test. Multivariable analysis was used to determine the effect of CT and radiation therapy (RT) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: We included 146 patients with UCCC, with a median follow-up of 27 months (range, 1-160). Ninety-five (65%) patients presented with stage I to II disease and 51 (35%) with stage III to IV disease. Forty-six percent of patients with clinical stage I were upstaged after surgery: 29% were upstaged to stages III and IV. Thirty-one percent of patients with early-stage disease and 70% with advanced-stage received CT. Among recurrences, the majority had distant relapse in both early-stage (61.5%) and advanced-stage (96.3%) diseases. In both patients with early-stage and advanced-stage diseases, adjuvant CT did not improve OS or PFS. On multivariate analysis, CT was not a significant factor associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-2.71; P = 0.37) or OS (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.24-1.38; P = 0.22), whereas RT was associated with improved PFS (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29-0.90; P = 0.02) and OS (HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.42; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of upstaging after surgery highlights the importance of lymph node assessment. The high rate of distant recurrence questions the effectiveness of current CT regimens and warrants the development of novel systemic approaches. The role of adjuvant RT deserves further study.