Discovery and Evaluation of C6-Substituted Pyrazolopyrimidine-Based Bisphosphonate Inhibitors of the Human Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase and Evaluation of Their Antitumor Efficacy in Multiple Myeloma, Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, and Colorectal Cancer.

Novel C6-substituted pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine- and C2-substituted purine-based bisphosphonate (C6-PyraP-BP and C2-Pur-BP, respectively) inhibitors of the human geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase (hGGPPS) were designed and evaluated for their ability to block the proliferation of multiple myeloma (MM), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. Pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine analogs were identified that induce selective intracellular target engagement leading to apoptosis and downregulate the prenylation of Rap-1A in MM, PDAC, and CRC cells. The C6-PyraP-BP inhibitor RB-07-16 was found to exhibit antitumor efficacy in xenograft mouse models of MM and PDAC, significantly reducing tumor growth without substantially increasing liver enzymes or causing significant histopathologic damage, usually associated with hepatotoxicity. RB-07-16 is a metabolically stable compound in cross-species liver microsomes, does not inhibit key CYP 450 enzymes, and exhibits good systemic circulation in rat. Collectively, the current studies provide encouraging support for further optimization of the pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine-based GGPPS inhibitors as potential human therapeutics for various cancers.

Melanomas with concurrent BRAF non-p.V600 and NF1 loss-of-function mutations are targetable by BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination therapy.

Although combination BRAF/MEK inhibition has produced significant survival benefits for BRAF p.V600 mutant melanomas, targeted therapies approved for BRAF non-p.V600 mutant melanomas remain limited. Through the analysis of 772 cutaneous melanoma exomes, we reveal that BRAF non-p.V600 mutations co-occurs more frequently with NF1 loss, but not with oncogenic NRAS mutations, than expected by chance. We present cell signaling data, which demonstrate that BRAF non-p.V600 mutants can signal as monomers and dimers within an NF1 loss context. Concordantly, BRAF inhibitors that inhibit both monomeric and dimeric BRAF synergize with MEK inhibition to significantly reduce cell viability in vitro and tumor growth in vivo in BRAF non-p.V600 mutant melanomas with co-occurring NF1 loss-of-function mutations. Our data suggest that patients harboring BRAF non-p.V600 mutant melanomas may benefit from current FDA-approved BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination therapy currently reserved for BRAF p.V600 mutant patients.

Mutations in the IFNγ-JAK-STAT Pathway Causing Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma Increase Sensitivity to Oncolytic Virus Treatment.

PURPOSE: Next-generation sequencing studies and CRISPR-Cas9 screens have established mutations in the IFNγ-JAK-STAT pathway as an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) resistance mechanism in a subset of patients with melanoma. We hypothesized ICI resistance mutations in the IFNγ pathway would simultaneously render melanomas susceptible to oncolytic virus (OV) therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Cytotoxicity experiments were performed with a number of OVs on a matched melanoma cell line pair generated from a baseline biopsy and a progressing lesion with complete JAK2 loss from a patient that relapsed on anti-PD-1 therapy, in melanoma lines following JAK1/2 RNA interference (RNAi) and pharmacologic inhibition and in Jak2 knockout (KO) B16-F10 mouse melanomas. Furthermore, we estimated the frequency of genetic alterations in the IFNγ-JAK-STAT pathway in human melanomas. RESULTS: The melanoma line from an anti-PD-1 progressing lesion was 7- and 22-fold more sensitive to the modified OVs, herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV1-dICP0) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV-Δ51), respectively, compared with the line from the baseline biopsy. RNAi, JAK1/2 inhibitor studies, and in vivo studies of Jak2 KOs B16-F10 melanomas revealed a significant increase in VSV-Δ51 sensitivity with JAK/STAT pathway inhibition. Our analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas data estimated that approximately 11% of ICI-naïve cutaneous melanomas have alterations in IFNγ pathway genes that may confer OV susceptibility. CONCLUSIONS: We provide mechanistic support for the use of OVs as a precision medicine strategy for both salvage therapy in ICI-resistant and first-line treatment in melanomas with IFNγ-JAK-STAT pathway mutations. Our study also supports JAK inhibitor-OV combination therapy for treatment-naïve melanomas without IFN signaling defects.See related commentary by Kaufman, p. 3278.

Dual MAPK Inhibition Is an Effective Therapeutic Strategy for a Subset of Class II BRAF Mutant Melanomas.

PURPOSE: Dual MAPK pathway inhibition (dMAPKi) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors improves survival in BRAF V600E/K mutant melanoma, but the efficacy of dMAPKi in non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors is poorly understood. We sought to characterize the responsiveness of class II (enhanced kinase activity, dimerization dependent) BRAF mutant melanoma to dMAPKi. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumors from patients with BRAF wild-type (WT), V600E (class I), and L597S (class II) metastatic melanoma were used to generate patient-derived xenografts (PDX). We assembled a panel of melanoma cell lines with class IIa (activation segment) or IIb (p-loop) mutations and compared these with WT or V600E/K BRAF mutant cells. Cell lines and PDXs were treated with BRAFi (vemurafenib, dabrafenib, encorafenib, and LY3009120), MEKi (cobimetinib, trametinib, and binimetinib), or the combination. We identified 2 patients with BRAF L597S metastatic melanoma who were treated with dMAPKi. RESULTS: BRAFi impaired MAPK signaling and cell growth in class I and II BRAF mutant cells. dMAPKi was more effective than either single MAPKi at inhibiting cell growth in all class II BRAF mutant cells tested. dMAPKi caused tumor regression in two melanoma PDXs with class II BRAF mutations and prolonged survival of mice with class II BRAF mutant melanoma brain metastases. Two patients with BRAF L597S mutant melanoma clinically responded to dMAPKi. CONCLUSIONS: Class II BRAF mutant melanoma is growth inhibited by dMAPKi. Responses to dMAPKi have been observed in 2 patients with class II BRAF mutant melanoma. These data provide rationale for clinical investigation of dMAPKi in patients with class II BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma.See related commentary by Johnson and Dahlman, p. 6107.