Regression of endothelial dysfunction in patients with endometriosis after surgical treatment: a 2-year follow-up study.

STUDY QUESTION: How does endothelial function change in women with endometriosis after surgical treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER: Surgical treatment of endometriosis leads to endothelial function improvement, resulting in reduction of cardiovascular risk. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Some recent studies have demonstrated that in young women with endometriosis, even if structural alterations are absent, endothelial dysfunction, expressed as flow-mediated dilation (FMD) impairment, can nevertheless occur. However, there are no data about changes of endothelial function in women with endometriosis after surgical treatment of endometriosis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a follow-up study carried out in 68 women enrolled in a previous study. Endothelial function was evaluated 2 years after surgical procedure and compared with baseline values. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Twenty-two patients who had undergone surgical treatment of endometriosis (named as patients with STE) and 10 control subjects without endometriosis, from the original study sample participated in this follow-up study. Assessment of endothelial function by FMD evaluation and measurements of serum markers of endothelial activation and inflammation were done in all these subjects. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After a 2-year follow-up period, FMD increased significantly with respect to baseline values among patients with STE [average pre- to post-difference: 5.07%, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.50, 6.63%; P < 0.001] but not among controls (average pre- to post-difference: 1.56%, 95% CI -0.55, 3.67%; P = 0.13). Follow-up FMD values were not significantly different between patients with STE and controls (average difference 1.50%, 95% CI -1.24, 4.23%; P = 0.27). Follow-up markers of inflammation and endothelial cells activation were similar among patients with STE and controls. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although this study represents the first in the literature assessing endothelial function after surgical treatment of endometriosis, further longitudinal studies are desirable to define better the real risk that women with a history of endometriosis will develop cardiovascular events. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Endothelial dysfunction may be a better predictor of future cardiovascular events than traditional risk factors and the improvement in endothelial function we observed in patients after STE may have significant implications for their future cardiovascular risk. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding has been either sought or obtained for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethanol injection is highly effective for hepatocellular carcinoma smaller than 2 cm.

AIM: To analyze the long-term prognosis in a cohort of western cirrhotic patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma treated with ethanol injection. METHODS: One-hundred forty-eight patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled. The tumor diameter was lower than 2 cm in 47 patients but larger in the remaining 101 patients. The impact of some pre-treatment clinical and laboratory parameters and of tumor recurrence on patients' survival was assessed. RESULTS: Among the pre-treatment parameters, only a tumor diameter of less than 2 cm was an independent prognostic factor of survival. The occurrence of new nodules in other liver segments and the neoplastic portal invasion were linked to a poorer prognosis at univariate analysis. Patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma smaller than 2 cm showed a better 5-year cumulative survival (73.0% vs 47.9%) (P = 0.009), 3-year local recurrence rate (29.1% vs 51.5%) (P = 0.011), and 5-year distant intrahepatic recurrence rate (52.9% vs 62.8%) (P = 0.054) compared to patients with a larger tumor. CONCLUSION: The 5-year survival rate of patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma < 2 cm undergoing ethanol injection is excellent and comparable to that achieved using radiofrequency ablation.

[Natural history, diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis B and C in hemodialysis patients]. / Storia naturale, diagnosi e terapia delle epatiti virali croniche B e C nei pazienti in trattamento emodialitico.

Chronic hepatitis B and C are important causes of liver disease in hemodialysis units. The most important route of transmission is the inapparent parenteral route; known risk factors are the high prevalence of HBV and HCV infections in hemodialysis units, previous blood transfusions, long-term dialysis treatment, frequent changes of hemodialysis unit, and previous renal transplants. The source, time and duration of infection are often difficult to ascertain. The studies investigating the natural history of viral hepatitis in hemodialysis patients are few and limited by a short follow-up, but they show an independent and negative impact on survival due to an increased risk of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The treatment options include conventional or pegylated interferon (alone or in association with ribavirin) and the nucleoside/nucleotide analogs. The aim of treatment is viral eradication or persistent suppression of viral replication. The altered pharmacokinetics, the increased risk of drug-related toxicity, and the need for renal transplant complicate the management of antiviral therapy. In patients with chronic HBV infection and active replication the most common approach is persistent suppression of viral replication using nucleoside/nucleotide analogs. As regards hepatitis C, several clinical trials evaluating conventional interferon monotherapy have shown higher sustained virological response and dropout rates in dialysis patients than in patients with normal kidney function. Data about pegylated interferon as monotherapy or in association with ribavirin are promising but limited. Hemodialyzed patients obtaining a sustained virological response often maintain the response after kidney transplantation.

Percutaneous laser ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous laser ablation for the treatment of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 9 male cirrhotic patients (mean age 50 years, range 45-60 years) with 12 biopsy proven nodules of hepatocellular carcinoma (mean diameter 2.0 cm, range 1.0-3.0 cm) treated by laser ablation before liver transplantation between June 2000 and January 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Laser ablation was carried out by inserting 300 nm optical fibers through 21-Gauge needles (from two to four) positioned under ultrasound guidance into the target lesions. A continuous wave Neodymium:Yttrium Aluminium Garnet laser was used. Transarterial chemoembolization prior to liver transplantation was performed in two incompletely ablated tumors. RESULTS: No procedure-related major complications were recorded. During the waiting time to liver transplantation local tumor progression after ablation occurred in 3 nodules (25%). At histological examination of the explanted livers complete necrosis was found in 8 nodules (66.7%, all treated exclusively with laser ablation), partial necrosis >50% in 3 nodules (25%), and partial necrosis <50% in 1 nodule. CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhotic livers awaiting liver transplantation, percutaneous laser ablation is safe and effective for the management of small hepatocellular carcinoma.