Associations Between Multiparametric US-Based Indicators and Pathological Status in Patients with Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive evaluation of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) using ultrasonography holds significant clinical value. The associations between ultrasound (US)-based parameters and the pathological spectra remain unclear and controversial. This study aims to investigate the associations thoroughly. METHODS: The participants with MAFLD undergoing liver biopsy and multiparametric ultrasonography were prospectively recruited from December 2020 to September 2022. Three US-based parameters, namely attenuation coefficient (AC), liver stiffness (LS) and dispersion slope (DS) were obtained. The relationship between these parameters and steatosis grades, inflammation grades and fibrosis stages was examined. RESULTS: In this study with 116 participants, AC values significantly differed across distinct steatosis grades (p < 0.001), while DS and LS values varied among inflammation grades (p < 0.001) and fibrosis stages (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of AC ranged from 0.82 to 0.84 for differentiating steatosis grades, while AUCs of LS ranged from 0.62 to 0.76 for distinguishing inflammation grades and 0.83-0.95 for discerning fibrosis stages. AUCs for DS ranged from 0.79 to 0.81 in discriminating inflammation grades and 0.80-0.88 for differentiating fibrosis stages. Subgroup analysis revealed that LS demonstrated different trends in inflammation grade but consistent trends in fibrosis stage across subgroups, whereas DS showed consistent trends for both inflammation grade and fibrosis stage across all subgroups. CONCLUSION: AC values indicate the degree of hepatic steatosis but not inflammation or fibrosis. LS values are determined only by fibrosis stage and are not associated with inflammation grades. DS values are associated with both fibrosis and inflammation grades.

Head-to-head comparison of three different US-based quantitative parameters for hepatic steatosis assessment: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of attenuation coefficient (AC), hepato-renal index (HRI) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) in quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis by employing histopathology as reference standard. METHODS: Participants with suspected metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) who underwent US-based parameter examinations and liver biopsy were prospectively recruited. The distributions of US parameters across different grades of steatosis were calculated, and diagnostic performance was determined based on the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 73 participants were included, with hepatic steatosis grades S0, S1, S2, and S3 distributed as follows: 13, 20, 27, and 13 respectively. The correlation coefficients for CAP, AC, and HRI ranged from 0.67 to 0.74. AC and HRI showed a strong correlation with steatosis grade. The AUC for CAP and AC in diagnosing steatosis ≥ S1 were significantly higher at 0.99 and 0.98 compared to HRI's value. For diagnosing steatosis ≥ S2, the AUC of CAP (AUC: 0.85) was lower than that of AC (AUC: 0.94), and HRI (AUC: 0.94). Similarly for diagnosing steatosis S3, the AUC of CAP (AUC: 0.68) was lower than that of AC (AUC: 0.88), and HRI (AUC: 0.88). CONCLUSION: The AC and HRI values increased with the progression of hepatic steatosis grade, while CAP increased from S0 to S2 but not from S2 to S3. For mild steatosis diagnosis, CAP and AC showed superior diagnostic performance compared to HRI, while AC and HRI were more advantageous in differentiating moderate and severe steatosis.