CAF-associated genes putatively representing distinct prognosis by in silico landscape of stromal components of colon cancer.

Comprehensive understanding prognostic relevance of distinct tumor microenvironment (TME) remained elusive in colon cancer. In this study, we performed in silico analysis of the stromal components of primary colon cancer, with a focus on the markers of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) and tumor-associated endothelia (TAE), as well as immunological infiltrates like tumor-associated myeloid cells (TAMC) and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). The relevant CAF-associated genes (CAFG)(representing R index = 0.9 or beyond with SPARC) were selected based on stroma specificity (cancer stroma/epithelia, cS/E = 10 or beyond) and expression amounts, which were largely exhibited negative prognostic impacts. CAFG were partially shared with TAE-associated genes (TAEG)(PLAT, ANXA1, and PTRF) and TAMC-associated genes (TAMCG)(NNMT), but not with CTL-associated genes (CTLG). Intriguingly, CAFG were prognostically subclassified in order of fibrosis (representing COL5A2, COL5A1, and COL12A1) followed by exclusive TAEG and TAMCG. Prognosis was independently stratified by CD8A, a CTL marker, in the context of low expression of the strongest negative prognostic CAFG, COL8A1. CTLG were comprehensively identified as IFNG, B2M, and TLR4, in the group of low S/E, representing good prognosis. Our current in silico analysis of the micro-dissected stromal gene signatures with prognostic relevance clarified comprehensive understanding of clinical features of the TME and provides deep insights of the landscape.

Laparoscopically Limited Anatomic Liver Resections: A Single-Center Analysis for Oncologic Outcomes of the Conceptual Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Limited anatomic resections (LARs), such as segmentectomies, performed using a fully laparoscopic approach, have gained popularity for liver malignancies. However, the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic LARs (Lap-LARs) needs further investigation. This cohort study evaluated the oncologic outcomes of Lap-LAR for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). METHODS: At a Japanese referral center, 112 patients underwent Lap-LAR using the Glissonean approach and indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), time to interventional failure (TIF), and time to surgical failure (TSF) were assessed. RESULTS: Among the 112 patients (median age, 74 years [range, 66-80 years]; 80 men [71.4 %]), Lap-LAR showed promising results. The median operative time was 348 min (range, 280-460 min), and the median blood loss was 190 mL (range, 95.5-452.0 mL). The median error between the estimated and actual liver volumes was 2 % (1.2-4.8 %). Complications greater than Clavien-Dindo 3a were observed in 11.6 % of the patients. The 5-year RFS, OS, and TIF rates for HCC were 45.1 % ± 7.9 %, 73.1 % ± 6.7 %, and 74.2 % ± 6 .6 %, respectively. The 5-year RFS, OS, and TSF rates for CRLM were 36.8 % ± 8.7 %, 60.1 % ± 13.3 %, and 63.6 % ± 10.4 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lap-LAR showed favorable oncologic outcomes for HCC and CRLM. Its precise technique makes it a promising therapeutic option for liver malignancies. Further comparisons with conventional approaches are warranted.

Less demand on stem cell marker-positive cancer cells may characterize metastasis of colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: CD44 and CD133 are stem cell markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). CD44 has distinctive isoforms with different oncological properties like total CD44 (CD44T) and variant CD44 (CD44V). Clinical significance of such markers remains elusive. METHODS: Sixty colon cancer were examined for CD44T/CD44V and CD133 at mRNA level in a quantitative PCR, and clarified for their association with clinicopathological factors. RESULTS: (1) Both CD44T and CD44V showed higher expression in primary colon tumors than in non-cancerous mucosas (p<0.0001), while CD133 was expressed even in non-cancerous mucosa and rather decreased in the tumors (p = 0.048). (2) CD44V expression was significantly associated with CD44T expression (R = 0.62, p<0.0001), while they were not correlated to CD133 at all in the primary tumors. (3) CD44V/CD44T expressions were significantly higher in right colon cancer than in left colon cancer (p = 0.035/p = 0.012, respectively), while CD133 expression were not (p = 0.20). (4) In primary tumors, unexpectedly, CD44V/CD44T/CD133 mRNA expressions were not correlated with aggressive phenotypes, but CD44V/CD44T rather significantly with less aggressive lymph node metastasis/distant metastasis (p = 0.040/p = 0.039, respectively). Moreover, both CD44V and CD133 expressions were significantly decreased in liver metastasis as compared to primary tumors (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0006, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our transcript expression analysis of cancer stem cell markers did not conclude that their expression could represent aggressive phenotypes of primary and metastatic tumors, and rather represented less demand on stem cell marker-positive cancer cells.

Haploinsufficiency by minute MutL homolog 1 promoter DNA methylation may represent unique phenotypes of microsatellite instability-gastric carcinogenesis.

Promoter DNA methylation of MutL homolog 1 (MLH1) is considered to play a causative role in microsatellite instability (MSI) carcinogenesis in primary gastric cancer, and a high MSI status is associated with treatment sensitivity to human cancers. Nevertheless, clinicopathological analysis is defective for MLH1 methylation status in a quantitative manner. We newly developed quantitative methylation specific PCR using a TaqMan probe and applied it to 138 patients with primary gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy in addition to basic molecular features such as MSI, Epstein Barr virus, and other DNA methylation status. (1) In primary gastric cancer, median methylation value was 0.055, ranging from 0 to 124.3. First, MLH1 hypermethylation was strongly correlated with MSI-High/MSI-Low status and suppressed immunostaining (P < 0.0001). (2) The MLH1 hypermethylation was associated with advanced age (P = 0.0048), antral location (P = 0.0486), synchronous multiple gastric cancer (P = 0.0001), and differentiated histology (P = 0.028). (3) Log-rank plot analysis identified the most relevant cut-off value (0.23) to reflect gentle phenotypes in MLH1 hypermethylation cases (P = 0.0019), especially in advanced gastric cancer (P = 0.0132), which are designated as haploinsufficiency of MSI (MSI-haplo) phenotype in this study. (4) In synchronous multiple gastric cancer, MLH1 hypermethylation was not necessarily confirmed as field cancerization. (5) MSI-haplo defined by MLH1 methylation status represented distinct prognostic phenotype even after molecular classifications. MLH1 hypermethylation designated as MSI-haplo may represent unique prognostic phenotype during gastric carcinogenesis.