A systematic review and meta-analyses of sentinel lymph node identification in breast cancer and melanoma, a plea for tracer mapping.

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become a widely accepted staging procedure for both breast carcinoma and melanoma. The aim of our study was to systematically review different SLNB techniques and perform a meta-analysis for corresponding identification and false-negative rates. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on SLNB in patients with early stage breast carcinoma and melanoma was performed. Only original study groups were included. The SLN identification rate and false negative rate were pooled for patients with breast carcinoma or melanoma according to radiocolloid tracer, blue dye, indocyanine green (ICG), or a combination of a radiocolloid tracer with blue dye or ICG. RESULTS: Between 1992 and 2012, a total of 154 studies (88 breast carcinoma and 66 melanoma) were reported that met our eligibility criteria. These studies included a total of 44,172 patients. The pooled SLN identification rate in breast carcinoma and melanoma patients using solely blue dye was 85% (range: 65-100%) and 84% (range: 59-100%), while for radiocolloid alone it was 94% (range: 67-100%) and 99% (range: 83-100%), respectively. Using a combination of radiocolloid and blue, identification rates were 95% (range 94-95%) and 98% (range: 98-98%). CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis provides data that favors the use of radiocolloid or radiocolloid combined with a blue dye for SLN identification. Performing SLNB with radiocolloid alone is the technique of choice for experienced surgeons, since blue dye has multiple disadvantages. SLNB using ICG as a fluorescent dye seems a promising technique for the near future.

Risk Factors for Positive Deep Pelvic Nodal Involvement in Patients with Palpable Groin Melanoma Metastases: Can the Extent of Surgery be Safely Minimized? : A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with palpable melanoma groin metastases have a poor prognosis. There is debate whether a combined superficial and deep groin dissection (CGD) is necessary or if superficial groin dissection (SGD) alone is sufficient. AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors for deep pelvic nodal involvement in a retrospective, multicenter cohort of palpable groin melanoma metastases. This could aid in the development of an algorithm for selective surgery in the future. METHODS: This study related to 209 therapeutic CGDs from four tertiary centers in The Netherlands (1992-2013), selected based on complete preoperative imaging and pathology reports. Analyzed risk factors included baseline and primary tumor characteristics, total and positive number of inguinal nodes, inguinal lymph node ratio (LNR) and positive deep pelvic nodes on imaging (computed tomography [CT] ± positron emission tomography [PET], or PET - low-dose CT). RESULTS: Median age was 57 years, 54 % of patients were female, and median follow-up was 21 months (interquartile range [IQR] 11-46 months). Median Breslow thickness was 2.10 mm (IQR 1.40-3.40 mm), and 26 % of all primary melanomas were ulcerated. Positive deep pelvic nodes occurred in 35 % of CGDs. Significantly fewer inguinal nodes were positive in case of negative deep pelvic nodes (median 1 [IQR 1-2] vs. 3 [IQR 1-4] for positive deep pelvic nodes; p < 0.001), and LNR was significantly lower for negative versus positive deep pelvic nodes [median 0.15 (IQR 0.10-0.25) vs. 0.33 (IQR 0.14-0.54); p < 0.001]. A combination of negative imaging, low LNR, low number of positive inguinal nodes, and no extracapsular extension (ECE) could accurately predict the absence of pelvic nodal involvement in 84 % of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with negative imaging, few positive inguinal nodes, no ECE, and low LNR have a low risk of positive deep pelvic nodes and may safely undergo SGD alone.

Deep lymph node metastases in the groin significantly affects prognosis, particularly in sentinel node-positive melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: In order to define patients eligible for only a superficial groin dissection or a combined superficial and deep groin dissection, this study aimed to determine the incidence of deep lymph node metastases (LNM) in patients with melanoma metastasized to the groin, to identify patient and melanoma factors that predict deep nodal involvement, and to analyze the impact of deep nodal involvement on survival and recurrence. METHODS: Patients who underwent a combined superficial (inguinal) and deep (iliac and obturator) complete (CLND) or therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) of the groin between 1994 and 2012 were analyzed. RESULTS: QueryDeep LNM were found in 8 of 62 CLND patients (13 %) and in 21 of 67 TLND patients (31 %). More than three superficial LNM was the only independent predictor for deep LNM in both CLND and TLND patients. The 5-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) for CLND and TLND patients with deep LNM was 14.3 and 16.6 %, respectively, and was significantly worse (hazard ratio [HR] 3.39, 95 % CI 1.34-8.58, p = 0.010; and HR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.04-3.88, p = 0.039) compared with CLND and TLND patients without deep LNM (5-year MSS: 54.1 and 37.2 %, respectively). Distant recurrence was significantly associated with deep LNM in CLND patients (p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that LNM in the deep area of the groin are fairly common in both CLND and TLND patients and significantly affect prognosis, especially in CLND patients. The number of superficial LNM is the only factor that was found to predict a finding of deep nodal metastases.

Outcome of clinical stage III melanoma patients with FDG-PET and whole-body CT added to the diagnostic workup.

BACKGROUND: Combined whole-body FDG-PET and CT provide the most comprehensive staging of melanoma patients with palpable lymph node metastases (LNM). The aim of this study is to analyze survival of FDG-PET and CT negative or positive melanoma patients and to assess which factors have independent prognostic impact on survival of these patients. METHODS: Patients with palpable and histologically or cytologically proven LNM of melanoma, referred to participating hospitals for examination with FDG-PET and CT, were selected from a previous study. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and disease-free period (DFP) were analyzed for FDG-PET and CT positive and negative patients using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox-regression analysis was performed to analyze which patient or melanoma characteristics had significant impact on MSS or DFP. RESULTS: For all 252 patients 5-year MSS was 38.2%. For FDG-PET and CT negative and positive patients 5-year MSS was 47.6 and 16.9%, respectively. Disease-free period for FDG-PET and CT negative patients was 46.0% after 5 years. Gender, a positive FDG-PET and CT, LNM in axilla compared to head or neck, and presence of extranodal growth were independent factors for worse MSS in all patients. Positive FDG-PET and CT was the most important prognostic factor for MSS with a hazard ratio of 2.54 (95% CI, 1.55-4.17, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Staging melanoma patients with palpable LNM is more accurate when whole-body FDG-PET and CT is added to the diagnostic workup. Hence, FDG-PET and CT, preferably combined, are indicated in the staging of clinical stage III melanoma patients.