Why aquatic scientists should use sulfur stable isotope ratios (ẟ34S) more often.

Over the last few decades, measurements of light stable isotope ratios have been increasingly used to answer questions across physiology, biology, ecology, and archaeology. The vast majority analyse carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) stable isotopes as the 'default' isotopes, omitting sulfur (δ34S) due to time, cost, or perceived lack of benefits and instrumentation capabilities. Using just carbon and nitrogen isotopic ratios can produce results that are inconclusive, uncertain, or in the worst cases, even misleading, especially for scientists that are new to the use and interpretation of stable isotope data. Using sulfur isotope values more regularly has the potential to mitigate these issues, especially given recent advancements that have lowered measurement barriers. Here we provide a review documenting case studies with real-world data, re-analysing different biological topics (i.e. niche, physiology, diet, movement and bioarchaeology) with and without sulfur isotopes to highlight the various strengths of this stable isotope for various applications. We also include a preliminary meta-analysis of the trophic discrimination factor (TDF) for sulfur isotopes, which suggest small (mean -0.4 ± 1.7 ‰ SD) but taxa-dependent mean trophic discrimination. Each case study demonstrates how the exclusion of sulfur comes at the detriment of the results, often leading to very different outputs, or missing valuable discoveries entirely. Given that studies relying on carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes currently underpin most of our understanding of various ecological processes, this has concerning implications. Collectively, these examples strongly suggest that researchers planning to use carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes for their research should incorporate sulfur where possible, and that the new 'default' isotope systems for aquatic science should now be carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur.

Feeding behavior of yellowfin tuna around two insular regions of the western Atlantic Ocean.

The yellowfin tuna is a very abundant tropical tuna species in the western equatorial Atlantic Ocean and an important fishery resource for the Brazilian tuna fleet. In this study we performed stable isotope analysis to better understand the spatial trophodynamics and dietary changes in yellowfin tuna around two insular marine protected areas in Brazil. A total of 65 yellowfin tuna specimens measuring between 47 and 138 cm LT (total length) were sampled around the archipelagos of Fernando de Noronha (FNA; n = 34) and Saint Peter and Saint Paul (SPSPA; n = 31) between July 2018 and September 2019. Bayesian mixing models and generalized additive models were used to investigate the contributions of four different prey items (zooplankton, cephalopods, fish larvae, and flying fish) to yellowfin tuna diet in each area and their potential changes in relation to predator growth. The four prey items were found to have different overall contributions between the two studied areas, with zooplankton being the most important prey in FNA, whereas flying fish was the most relevant prey to the species' diet in SPSPA. Significant changes in the species diet by size were also found, with fish smaller than 90 cm (TL) having a more generalist diet and larger animals relying more on consuming larger and more nutritious prey (i.e., flying fish). Our results suggest that these two marine protected areas play an important role in ocean dynamics, providing important and different foraging grounds for the development of this predator species.

Bioecology and movements of bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas, caught in a long-term longline survey off northeastern Brazil

A robust understanding of habitat usage by coastal shark species, and how it overlaps with human presence in densely-populated regions is needed to inform the development of efficient conservation strategies for these important top predators. An intensive longline survey conducted in nearshore waters off northeastern Brazil from 2004 through 2014 caught a total of 18 bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) (male-female ratio = 0.63:1), which can be dangerous to humans. Although most sharks were sexually mature, there was no evidence that this region could be used as a parturition or nursery area. Prey items identified in the guts of the sharks comprised teleosts, mollusks and elasmobranchs. Additionally, one satellite-tagged bull shark covered a great distance (> 3,000 km) in 75 days at liberty, making most use of shallow waters (< 20 m depth) and presumably also entering an estuarine area. Although bull sharks are not an important fishery resource in this region, such a reduced abundance coupled with its affinity for coastal and inshore habitats highlights the potential vulnerability of C. leucas to deleterious anthropic interferences off northeastern Brazil.(AU)

Um melhor entendimento sobre a utilização de hábitat das espécies de tubarões costeiros, e como ela se sobrepõe à presença humana em regiões altamente populosas, se faz necessário a fim de subsidiar o desenvolvimento de eficientes medidas de conservação para esses importantes predadores de topo. Um estudo intensivo utilizando espinhel, conduzido em águas costeiras do nordeste do Brasil entre os anos de 2004 e 2014, capturou um total de 18 tubarões cabeça-chata (Carcharhinus leucas) (proporção macho-fêmea = 0,63:1), os quais podem ser perigosos para humanos. Apesar da maioria dos tubarões estarem sexualmente maduros, não houve evidências de que essa região esteja sendo utilizada como uma área de parto ou berçário. Entre os itens alimentares identificados foram encontrados teleósteos, moluscos e elasmobrânquios. Além disso, um tubarão cabeça-chata marcado com um transmissor satélite percorreu uma grande distância (> 3.000 km) em 75 dias em liberdade, fazendo o uso de águas superficiais (< 20 m profundidade) e presumivelmente entrando em uma área estuarina. Apesar de os tubarões cabeça-chata não corresponderem a um recurso pesqueiro importante nessa região, tal reduzida abundância juntamente com a sua afinidade por hábitats costeiros reforçam a potencial vulnerabilidade de C. leucas às interferências antrópicas deletérias ao longo da costa nordeste do Brasil.(AU)