Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Educ Psychol Rev ; 34(3): 1709-1737, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35437341

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of embodied learning on children's pre-reading and word reading skills. We conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial including two intervention groups and one control group. One hundred forty-nine children from grade 0 (5-6 years old) who had just started school were recruited from 10 different classes from four elementary schools. Within each class, children were randomly assigned to receive teaching of letter-sound couplings and word decoding either with whole-body movements (WM), hand movements (HM), or no movements (CON) over an 8-week period. Children were evaluated on pre-reading, word reading, and motor skills before (T1), immediately after (T2), and after 17-22 weeks of retention period (T3) following the intervention. Between-group analysis showed a significant improvement in children's ability to name letter-sounds correctly from T1 to T2 (p < 0.001) and from T1 to T3 (p < 0.05) for WM compared to CON. HM and WM improved significantly in naming conditional letter-sounds from T1 to T2 (p < 0.01, p < 0.01) compared to CON and from T1 to T3 for the HM group compared to CON (p < 0.05). We did not find an effect on word reading or a correlation between motor skill performance and reading. Results from the present study suggest that there are beneficial effects of using whole-body movements for children. Hand motor movements indeed also had a performance effect on letter-sound knowledge; however, the whole-body movements had longer-lasting effects. We do not see an effect on whole word reading.

2.
Dyslexia ; 23(3): 251-267, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28660656

RESUMEN

Early screening for reading difficulties before the onset of instruction is desirable because it allows intervention that is targeted at prevention rather than remediation of reading difficulties. However, early screening may be too inaccurate to effectively allocate resources to those who need them. The present study compared the accuracy of early screening before the onset of formal reading instruction with late screening six months into the first year of instruction. The study followed 164 Danish students from the end of Grade 0 to the end of Grade 2. Early screening included measures of phonemic awareness, rapid naming, letter knowledge, paired associate learning, and reading. Late screening included only reading. Results indicated that reading measures improved substantially as predictors over the first six months of Grade 1, to the point where late reading measures alone provided as much information as the early measures combined. In the light of these results and a less than perfect early screening accuracy, a new strategy for screening is introduced and discussed. The strategy proposes multi-point screening with gradually increasing sensitivity to strike a balance between manageable screening procedures and outcomes and early identification of students who are most likely in need of extra resources. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos/psicología , Dislexia/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Precoz , Aprendizaje por Asociación , Concienciación , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fonética
3.
Behav Genet ; 41(1): 125-33, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20798984

RESUMEN

Dyslexia is one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders where likely many genes are involved in the pathogenesis. So far six candidate dyslexia genes have been proposed, and two of these were identified by rare chromosomal translocations in affected individuals. By systematic re-examination of all translocation carriers in Denmark, we have identified 16 different translocations associated with dyslexia. In four families, where the translocation co-segregated with the phenotype, one of the breakpoints concurred (at the cytogenetic level) with either a known dyslexia linkage region--at 15q21 (DYX1), 2p13 (DYX3) and 1p36 (DYX8)--or an unpublished linkage region at 19q13. As a first exploitation of this unique cohort, we identify three novel candidate dyslexia genes, ZNF280D and TCF12 at 15q21, and PDE7B at 6q23.3, by molecular mapping of the familial translocation with the 15q21 breakpoint.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Transcripción con Motivo Hélice-Asa-Hélice Básico/genética , Fosfodiesterasas de Nucleótidos Cíclicos Tipo 7/genética , Dislexia/genética , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso/genética , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Translocación Genética/genética , Dedos de Zinc/genética , Adulto , Amniocentesis , Niño , Mapeo Cromosómico , Cromosomas Humanos Par 15/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 6/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , Proteínas del Citoesqueleto , Dinamarca , Femenino , Tamización de Portadores Genéticos , Humanos , Cariotipificación , Masculino , Linaje , Fenotipo , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Embarazo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...