Population Pharmacokinetics of Apixaban in Subjects With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

This analysis describes the population pharmacokinetics (PPK) of apixaban in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) subjects, and quantifies the impact of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on exposure. The PPK model was developed using data from phase I-III studies. Apixaban exposure was characterized by a two-compartment PPK model with first-order absorption and elimination. Predictive covariates on apparent clearance included age, sex, Asian race, renal function, and concomitant strong/moderate cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4/P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors. Individual covariate effects generally resulted in < 25% change in apixaban exposure vs. the reference NVAF subject (non-Asian, male, aged 65 years, weighing 70 kg without concomitant CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitors), except for severe renal impairment, which resulted in 55% higher exposure than the reference subject. The dose-reduction algorithm resulted in a ~27% lower median exposure, with a large overlap between the 2.5-mg and 5-mg groups. The impact of Asian race on apixaban exposure was < 15% and not considered clinically significant.

A population pharmacokinetic model of cabozantinib in healthy volunteers and patients with various cancer types.

PURPOSE: An integrated population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was developed to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib in healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients with various cancer types and to identify any differences in cabozantinib PK across these populations. METHODS: Plasma concentration data used to develop the popPK model were obtained from nine clinical trials (8072 concentrations from 1534 HVs or patients) of cabozantinib in HVs and patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), glioblastoma multiforme, castration-resistant prostate cancer, or other advanced malignancies. RESULTS: PK data across studies were adequately characterized by a two-compartment disposition model with dual first- and zero-order absorption processes and first-order elimination. Baseline demographic covariates (age, weight, gender, race, and cancer type) were generally predicted to have a small-to-moderate impact on apparent clearance (CL/F). However, MTC cancer type did show an approximately 93% higher CL/F relative to HVs following chronic dosing, resulting in approximately 40-50% lower predicted steady-state cabozantinib plasma concentrations. CONCLUSION: This popPK analysis showed cabozantinib CL/F values to be higher for patients with MTC and may account for the higher dosage required in this patient population (140-mg) to achieve plasma exposures comparable to those in patients with RCC and other tumor types administered a 60-mg cabozantinib tablet dose. Possible factors that may underlie the higher cabozantinib clearance observed in MTC patients are discussed.

Population exposure-response analysis of cabozantinib efficacy and safety endpoints in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In the phase III METEOR trial, tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival compared to everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had received prior VEGFR inhibitor therapy. In METEOR, RCC patients started at a daily 60-mg cabozantinib tablet (Cabometyx™) dose but could reduce to 40- or 20-mg to achieve a tolerated exposure. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Exposure-response (ER) models were developed to characterize the relationship between cabozantinib at clinically relevant exposures in RCC patients enrolled in METEOR and efficacy (PFS and tumor response) and safety endpoints. RESULTS: Compared to the average steady-state cabozantinib concentration for a 60-mg dose, exposures at simulated 40- and 20-mg starting doses were predicted to result in higher risk of disease progression or death [hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.10 and 1.39, respectively], lower maximal median reduction in tumor size (- 11.9 vs - 9.1 and - 4.5%, respectively), and lower ORR (19.1 vs 15.6 and 8.7%, respectively). The 60-mg exposure was also associated with higher risk for selected adverse events (AEs) palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (grade ≥ 1), fatigue/asthenia (grade ≥ 3), diarrhea (grade ≥ 3), and hypertension (predicted HRs of 2.21, 2.01, 1.78, and 1.85, respectively) relative to the predicted average steady-state cabozantinib concentration for a 20-mg starting dose. CONCLUSION: ER modeling predicted that cabozantinib exposures in RCC patients at the 60-mg starting dose would provide greater anti-tumor activity relative to exposures at simulated 40- and 20-mg starting doses that were associated with decreased rates of clinically relevant AEs.

Population dose-response analysis of daily seizure count following vigabatrin therapy in adult and pediatric patients with refractory complex partial seizures.

Vigabatrin is an irreversible inhibitor of γ-aminobutyric acid transaminase (GABA-T) and is used as an adjunctive therapy for adult patients with refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS). The purpose of this investigation was to describe the relationship between vigabatrin dosage and daily seizure rate for adults and children with rCPS and identify relevant covariates that might impact seizure frequency. This population dose-response analysis used seizure-count data from three pediatric and two adult randomized controlled studies of rCPS patients. A negative binomial distribution model adequately described daily seizure data. Mean seizure rate decreased with time after first dose and was described using an asymptotic model. Vigabatrin drug effects were best characterized by a quadratic model using normalized dosage as the exposure metric. Normalized dosage was an estimated parameter that allowed for individualized changes in vigabatrin exposure based on body weight. Baseline seizure rate increased with decreasing age, but age had no impact on vigabatrin drug effects after dosage was normalized for body weight differences. Posterior predictive checks indicated the final model was capable of simulating data consistent with observed daily seizure counts. Total normalized vigabatrin dosages of 1, 3, and 6 g/day were predicted to reduce seizure rates 23.2%, 45.6%, and 48.5%, respectively.

Vigabatrin pediatric dosing information for refractory complex partial seizures: results from a population dose-response analysis.

We predicted vigabatrin dosages for adjunctive therapy for pediatric patients with refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) that would produce efficacy comparable to that observed for approved adult dosages. A dose-response model related seizure-count data to vigabatrin dosage to identify dosages for pediatric rCPS patients. Seizure-count data were obtained from three pediatric and two adult rCPS clinical trials. Dosages were predicted for oral solution and tablet formulations. Predicted oral solution dosages to achieve efficacy comparable to that of a 1 g/day adult dosage were 350 and 450 mg/day for patients with body weight ranges 10-15 and >15-20 kg, respectively. Predicted oral solution dosages for efficacy comparable to a 3 g/day adult dosage were 1,050 and 1,300 mg/day for weight ranges 10-15 and >15-20 kg, respectively. Predicted tablet dosage for efficacy comparable to a 1 g/day adult dosage was 500 mg/day for weight ranges 25-60 kg. Predicted tablet dosage for efficacy comparable to a 3 g/day adult dosage was 2,000 mg for weight ranges 25-60 kg. Vigabatrin dosages were identified for pediatric rCPS patients with body weights ≥10 kg.

Population pharmacokinetics analysis of vigabatrin in adults and children with epilepsy and children with infantile spasms.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vigabatrin is an inhibitor of γ-aminobutyric acid transaminase. The purpose of these analyses was to develop a population pharmacokinetics model to characterize the vigabatrin concentration-time profile for adults and children with refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) and for children with infantile spasms (IS); to identify covariates that affect its disposition, and to enable predictions of systemic vigabatrin exposure for patients 1-12 months of age. METHODS: Vigabatrin pharmacokinetic data from six randomized controlled clinical trials and one open-label study were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Data collected from 349 adults with rCPS and 119 pediatric patients with rCPS or IS were used in the analyses. RESULTS: A two-compartment model with first-order elimination and transit-compartment absorption consisting of five transit compartments adequately described the vigabatrin concentration-time data for these adult and pediatric patient populations. An exponential error model was used to estimate inter-individual variability for the transit-rate constant (k tr) (24.2 %), elimination rate constant (k) (14.7 %) and apparent central volume of distribution (V c/F) (18 %). For the study of children with IS, inter-occasion variability was estimated for k tr (58.1 %) and relative bioavailability (F) (26.9 %). Covariate analysis indicated that age, creatinine clearance (CLCR), and body weight were important predictors of vigabatrin pharmacokinetic parameters. Vigabatrin apparent clearance increased with increasing CLCR, consistent with renal excretion (primary pathway of vigabatrin elimination). Rate of vigabatrin absorption was dependent on age. The rate was slower in younger patients, which resulted in a smaller predicted maximum concentration and longer predicted time to maximum concentrations. Vigabatrin V c/F, apparent inter-compartmental clearance between the central and peripheral compartment, and apparent peripheral volume of distribution were increased with greater patient body weights. Sex did not contribute significantly to vigabatrin pharmacokinetic variability. CONCLUSION: The model adequately described vigabatrin pharmacokinetic and enabled predictions of systemic exposures in pediatric patients 1-12 months of age.

Longitudinal FEV1 dose-response model for inhaled PF-00610355 and salmeterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The objective of this work was to characterize the dose-response relationship between two inhaled long-acting beta agonists (PF-00610355 and salmeterol) and the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in order to inform dosing recommendations for future clinical trials in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This meta-analysis of four studies included 8,513 FEV1 measurements from 690 patients with moderate COPD. A longitudinal kinetic-pharmacodynamic (K-PD) model was developed and adequately described changes in FEV1 measurements over time, including circadian patterns within a day, as well as changes in FEV1 measurements elicited from administration of PF-00610355 or salmeterol. The fine-particle dose, the amount of drug present in particles small enough for lung delivery, was used as the exposure measure for PF-00610355. Greater reversibility following administration of a short-acting beta agonist during run-in was associated with increased FEV1 response to long-acting beta agonists (through an increased maximal response, E(max)). Simulations were conducted to better understand the response to PF-00610355 relative to placebo and salmeterol. The results of the simulations show that once daily fine-particle doses of 28.1 µg versus placebo have a moderate probability of providing an average improvement above 100 mL at trough. The 50 µg fine-particle dose, on the other hand, has a greater than 0.78 probability of achieving a 120 mL improvement versus placebo at trough. From an efficacy perspective and assuming a fine-particle fraction of 25 % for the Phase 3 formulation; 100 and 200 µg once daily nominal doses would be of interest to investigate in future Phase 3 trials.

Population pharmacokinetics of pegaptanib in patients with neovascular, age-related macular degeneration.

The anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) aptamer pegaptanib is eliminated primarily by renal clearance. Because renal function declines with age, pegaptanib exposure in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) may increase. Therefore, a population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of pegaptanib was undertaken in Western and Asian AMD patients to determine the influence of renal function on apparent pegaptanib clearance (CL). Pegaptanib (0.3-3 mg per eye) was administered every 4 to 6 weeks to 262 AMD patients in 4 studies. Pegaptanib exposures (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] and maximum plasma concentration) after 8 doses were similar to exposures following the first dose, consistent with the absence of plasma accumulation. A 1-compartment model parameterized in terms of the absorption rate constant, apparent volume of distribution, and CL was used to describe the pegaptanib plasma concentration data. Creatinine clearance (CLCR), body weight (WT), and age influenced pegaptanib PK. Decreasing CLCR from 70 to 30 mL/min doubled AUC. After adjustment for CLCR, WT, and age, the model predicted no race differences in CL or AUC. Given that the therapeutic 0.3 mg per eye dose of pegaptanib results in exposures one-tenth of those observed following the well-tolerated 3-mg dose, these results suggest that no dose adjustment is warranted for AMD patients with moderate renal insufficiency (CLCR >30 mL/min).

Influence of metoprolol dosage release formulation on the pharmacokinetic drug interaction with paroxetine.

Studies have demonstrated an influence of dosage release formulations on drug interactions and enantiomeric plasma concentrations. Metoprolol is a commonly used beta-adrenergic antagonist metabolized by CYP2D6. The CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine has previously been shown to interact with metoprolol tartrate. This open-label, randomized, 4-phase crossover study assessed the potential differential effects of paroxetine on stereoselective pharmacokinetics of immediate-release (IR) tartrate and extended-release (ER) succinate metoprolol formulations. Ten healthy participants received metoprolol IR (50 mg) and ER (100 mg) with and without paroxetine coadministration. Blood samples were collected over 24 hours for determination of metoprolol plasma enantiomer concentrations. Paroxetine coadministration significantly increased S and R metoprolol area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the 24-hour blood draw (AUC(0-24h)) by 4- and 5-fold, respectively for IR, and 3- and 4-fold, respectively, for ER. S/R AUC ratios significantly decreased. These results demonstrate a pharmacokinetic interaction between paroxetine and both formulations of metoprolol. The interaction is greater with R metoprolol, and stereoselective metabolism is lost. This could theoretically result in greater beta-blockade and lost cardioselectivity. The magnitude of the interaction was similar between metoprolol formulations, which may be attributable to low doses/drug input rates employed.

The impact of paroxetine coadministration on stereospecific carvedilol pharmacokinetics.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: to assess the impact of paroxetine coadministration on the stereoselective pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of carvedilol. DESIGN: prospective, randomized, 2-phase crossover. SETTING: the University of Michigan General Clinical Research Unit and Michigan Clinical Research Unit. PARTICIPANTS: twelve healthy volunteers aged 18 to 45 years, male and female, receiving no treatment with prescription or nonprescription medications. INTERVENTIONS: participants received single dose oral carvedilol (12.5 mg) with and without coadministration of immediate-release paroxetine (10 mg orally twice daily), in random order. Blood samples were collected at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours post-carvedilol dose for determination of R and S carvedilol plasma enantiomer concentrations by high pressure liquid chromatography. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated for each enantiomer by noncompartmental methods and compared between study phases by analysis of variance (ANOVA) controlling for study phase order and subject, with Tukey's studentized range test post hoc. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased significantly with paroxetine coadministration, approximately 2.5-fold and 1.9-fold for the R and S enantiomers, respectively. R/S AUC ratio increased significantly, from approximately 2.3 to 3.0. Individual increases in enantiomeric AUCs with paroxetine coadministration ranged from 0% to 571% and changes in R/S ratio ranged from -8% to 108%. Heart rate, P-R interval, and blood pressure were monitored and no clinically significant changes in carvedilol effects were noted. CONCLUSION: this study demonstrated a PK drug-drug interaction between paroxetine and carvedilol, with considerable interparticipant variability in carvedilol PK parameters and magnitude of drug interaction. Stereoselectivity of carvedilol metabolism is preserved with paroxetine coadministration, and R/S AUC ratio generally widens. Although this drug interaction could potentially increase adrenergic antagonism and have significant clinical effects in patients, these effects were not seen in our healthy volunteer participants.

Development of a population pharmacokinetic model for taranabant, a cannibinoid-1 receptor inverse agonist.

Taranabant is a cannabinoid-1 receptor inverse agonist developed for the treatment of obesity. A population model was constructed to facilitate the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters and to identify the influence of selected covariates. Data from 12 phase 1 studies and one phase 2 study were pooled from subjects administered single and multiple oral doses of taranabant ranging from 0.5 to 8 mg. A total of 6,834 taranabant plasma concentrations from 187 healthy and 385 obese subjects were used to develop the population model in NONMEM. A standard covariate analysis using forward selection (α = 0.05) and backward elimination (α = 0.001) was conducted. A three-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately described plasma taranabant concentrations. The population mean estimates for apparent clearance and apparent steady-state volume of distribution were 25.4 L/h and 2,578 L, respectively. Statistically significant covariate effects were modest in magnitude and not considered clinically relevant (the effects of body mass index (BMI) and creatinine clearance (CrCL) on apparent clearance; BMI, age, CrCL, and gender on apparent volume of the peripheral compartment and age on apparent intercompartmental clearance). The pharmacokinetic profile of taranabant can adequately be described by a three-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Clinical dose adjustment based on covariates effects is not warranted.

The effect of age, gender, and body mass index on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vildagliptin in healthy volunteers.

UNLABELLED: What is already known about this subject. Vildagliptin is a new, potent, and selective inhibitor of DPP-4. The efficacy and safety of vildagliptin in type 2 diabetes has been intensively studied in diverse subject populations. There has been little information published about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vildagliptin. What this study adds. No clinically relevant changes in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics were observed between young and elderly, male and female, or high body mass index (BMI) and low BMI subjects. The results suggest that no dose modification is necessary for vildagliptin based on the age, gender, or BMI of a subject. AIMS: To evaluate the effect of age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vildagliptin. METHODS: Forty healthy subjects received a single oral dose of 100 mg vildagliptin to assess the effects of age, gender, and BMI on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, reflected by the time course of inhibition of DPP-4 activity, of vildagliptin. RESULTS: Peak concentration and exposure (AUC((0-infinity))) of vildagliptin were 17% (90% CI 2, 35%) and 31% (90% CI 18, 45%) higher in elderly vs. young subjects. Renal clearance was reduced by 32% (90% CI 17, 45%) in elderly subjects. The pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin were not significantly influenced by gender or BMI. Inhibition of DPP-4 activity was similar regardless of age, gender, or BMI. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of a single oral 100 mg dose of vildagliptin were not affected by gender and BMI. Exposure to vildagliptin was higher in elderly patients, but this was not associated with any difference in the effect of DPP-4 inhibition. Based on these results, no vildagliptin dose adjustment is necessary for age, gender, or BMI.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Vildagliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitor currently under development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVES: To assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and tolerability of vildagliptin at doses of 10 mg, 25 mg and 100 mg twice daily following oral administration in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Thirteen patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in this randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, four-period, crossover study. Patients received vildagliptin 10 mg, 25 mg and 100 mg as well as placebo twice daily for 28 days. RESULTS: Vildagliptin was absorbed rapidly (median time to reach maximum concentration 1 hour) and had a mean terminal elimination half-life ranging from 1.32 to 2.43 hours. The peak concentration and total exposure increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner. Vildagliptin inhibited DPP-4 (>90%) at all doses and demonstrated a dose-dependent effect on the duration of inhibition. The areas under the plasma concentration-time curves of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) [p < 0.001] and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) [p < 0.001] were increased whereas postprandial glucagon was significantly reduced at the 25 mg (p = 0.006) and 100mg (p = 0.005) doses compared with placebo. As compared with placebo treatment, mean plasma glucose concentrations were decreased by 1.4 mmol/L with the vildagliptin 25 mg dosing regimen and by 2.5 mmol/L with the 100 mg dosing regimen, corresponding to a 10% and 19% reduction, respectively. Vildagliptin was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Vildagliptin is likely to be a useful therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes based on the inhibition of DPP-4 and the subsequent increase in incretin hormones, GLP-1 and GIP, and the decrease in glucose and glucagon levels.