The West Jutland Tele-Electrocardiogram Registry (WEJU-tECG): content, data quality, and research potential.

AIM: To present the content, data quality, and research potential of the West Jutland Tele-Electrocardiogram Registry (WEJU-tECG). METHODS: Danish patients reporting symptoms indicating heart disease in the prehospital setting are subjected to a 12-lead tele-electrocardiogram (ECG) in the ambulance, which is digitally sent to a local tele-centre. WEJU-tECG is a newly established Danish registry containing information from the individual tele-ECGs received at the Regional Hospital West Jutland tele-centre. RESULTS: WEJU-tECG holds extracted information from all tele-ECGs with a valid Civil Personal Register number between 2011 and 2020. WEJU-tECG contains information on patient characteristics, tele-ECG data (including a computerised tele-ECG interpretation), vital signs, and time information. A unique Civil Personal Register number allows individual-level linkage between WEJU-tECG and other Danish registries and enables complete follow-up. WEJU-tECG contains 43,696 tele-ECGs from 29,489 different patient contacts among 20,280 different patients. WEJU-tECG contains 5566 patients with ST-segment deviations. The median age is 67 years and 45% are women. Completeness is highest for time information (100% for all variables), tele-ECG data (99% for heart rate, the specific intervals and axes, and QRS duration, and 86% for J-point deviation), and patient characteristics (100% for all variables). Completeness is lowest for vital signs (13% for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure, and 12% for blood oxygen saturation). The computerised tele-ECG interpretation had a negative predictive value of 80% for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 94% for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and a positive predictive value of 45% for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 32% for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: WEJU-tECG is a novel population-based tele-ECG registry with high research potential.

Comparison of Acute Versus Subacute Coronary Angiography in Patients With NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the NONSTEMI Trial).

The optimal timing of coronary angiography (CAG) in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome without persisting ST-segment elevation (NST-ACS) remains undetermined. The NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction trial aimed to compare outcomes in NSTE-ACS patients randomized to acute CAG (STEMI-like approach) with patients randomized to medical therapy and subacute CAG. We randomized 496 patients with suspected NST-ACS based on symptoms and significant regional ST depressions and/or elevated point-of-care troponin T (POC-cTnT) (≥50 ng/l) to either acute CAG (<2 hours, n = 245) or subacute CAG (<72 hours, n = 251). The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, reinfarction, and readmission with congestive heart failure within 1 year from randomization. A final acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosis was assigned to 429 (86.5%) patients. The median time from randomization to revascularization was 1.3 hours in the acute CAG group versus 51.1 hours in the subacute CAG group (p <0.001). The composite end point occurred in 25 patients (10.2%) in the acute CAG group and 29 (11.6%) in the subacute CAG group, p = 0.62. The acute CAG group had a 1-year all-cause mortality of 5.7% compared with 5.6% in the subacute CAG group, p = 0.96. In conclusion, neither the composite end point of all-cause death, reinfarction, and readmission with congestive heart failure nor mortality differed between an acute and subacute CAG approach in NSTE-ACS patients. However, identification of NSTE-ACS patients in the prehospital phase and direct triage to an invasive center is feasible, safe and may facilitate early diagnosis and revascularization.

Editor's Choice-Acute versus subacute angiography in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction - the NONSTEMI trial phase I.

BACKGROUND: The 2015 European Society of Cardiology non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) guidelines recommend angiography within 24 h in high-risk patients with NSTEMI. An organized STEMI-like approach with pre-hospital or immediate in-hospital triage for acute coronary angiography (CAG) may be of therapeutic benefit but it remains unknown whether the patients can be properly diagnosed in the pre-hospital setting. We aim to evaluate whether it is feasible to diagnose patients with NSTEMI in the pre-hospital phase or immediately upon admission. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 250 patients to either acute or subacute CAG (i.e. <72 h of admission). Pre-hospital electrocardiogram acquisition and point-of-care troponin-T measurement ensured that 148 (59%) patients were identified already in the ambulance, whereas the remaining 102 (41%) patients were identified immediately after hospital admission. An acute coronary syndrome was verified in 215 (86%) and NSTEMI in 159 (64%) patients. The CAG rate was significantly higher in the acute CAG group (98% vs. 87%, p<0.001). A culprit lesion was identified in 74% and 64% of the patients underwent coronary revascularization: acute CAG group: 53% percutaneous coronary intervention, 5% hybrid, 7% coronary artery bypass grafting; conventional treatment: 48% percutaneous coronary intervention, 2% hybrid, 14% coronary artery bypass grafting, p=0.32. In patients randomized to acute CAG, time from randomization to CAG was 1.1 h; in patients randomized to subacute CAG it was two days. Time from randomization to initial revascularization was 1.3 h versus 2.4 days, and the median hospital stay was 4.0 days versus 4.5 days. Among patients randomized to subacute CAG, 17% crossed over to acute CAG and 5% developed STEMI before catheterization. CONCLUSION: Diagnosing NSTEMI patients in the pre-hospital phase or immediately upon hospital admission is feasible. Acute CAG may impact the mode of revascularization and is associated with earlier revascularization and shorter hospital stay. The clinical benefit of acute CAG in NSTEMI patients remains to be clarified.

Dyspnea, a high-risk symptom in patients suspected of myocardial infarction in the ambulance? A population-based follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Systematic management of patients suffering high-risk symptoms is essential in emergency medical services. Patients with chest pain receive algorithm-based work-up and treatment. Though dyspnea is recognized as an independent predictor of mortality, no generally accepted prehospital treatment algorithm exists and this may affect outcome. The objective of this study was to compare mortality in patients suspected of myocardial infarction (MI) presenting with dyspnea versus chest pain in the ambulance. METHODS: Follow-up study in patients undergoing electrocardiogram-based telemedical triage because of suspected MI in an ambulance in the Central Denmark Region from 1 June 2008 to 1 January 2013. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 4-year mortality and mortality rates in subgroups of patients with and without a confirmed MI. Absolute risk differences adjusted for comorbidity, age, systolic blood pressure and heart rate were calculated by a generalized linear regression model. RESULTS: Of 17,398 patients, 12,230 (70%) suffered from chest pain, 1464 (8%) from dyspnea, 3540 (20%) from other symptoms and 164 (1%) from cardiac arrest. Among patients with dyspnea, 30-day mortality was 13% (CI 12-15) and 4-year mortality was 50% (CI 47-54) compared to 2.9% (CI 2.6-3.2) and 20% (CI 19-21) in patients with chest pain. MI was confirmed in 121 (8.3%) patients with dyspnea and in 2319 (19%) with chest pain. Patients with dyspnea and confirmed MI had a 30-day and 4-year mortality of 21 % (CI 15-30) and 60% (CI 50-70) compared to 5.0% (CI 4.2-5.8) and 23% (CI 21-25) in patients with chest pain and confirmed MI. Adjusting for age, comorbidity, systolic blood pressure and heart rate did not change these patterns. CONCLUSION: Patients suspected of MI presenting with dyspnea have significantly higher short- and long-term mortality than patients with chest pain irrespective of a confirmed MI diagnosis. Future studies should examine if supplementary prehospital diagnostics can improve triage, facilitate early therapy and improve outcome in patients presenting with dyspnea.

Patient-reported health as a prognostic factor for adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE: A relation may exist between self-reported health and adverse events in coronary heart disease. Previous studies have been vulnerable to possible selection bias. In the study reported here, we examined the association between self-rated health and adverse events in terms of cardiac events, cardiac readmissions, and all-cause mortality in a complete cohort of patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A cohort of patients with coronary heart disease treated with PCI was followed up with questionnaires 4 weeks after PCI to measure self-rated health and in registers to identify adverse events. Of 1,752 eligible patients under 67 years, 26 died during the first 4 weeks. A total of 224 patients were excluded from the analysis because they were readmitted with a cardiac diagnosis before answering the first questionnaire. We received complete SF-12 Health Survey component summaries from 984 of the remaining 1,502 patients. We used multiple imputation to establish a complete cohort, including nonrespondents. RESULTS: During follow-up, 83 patients died, 220 patients experienced a new cardiac event, and 526 patients experienced a hospital readmission related to coronary heart disease. Poor self-rated health was related to cardiac events, cardiac readmission, and all-cause mortality. The associations were stronger for all-cause mortality than for events and readmissions. Physical health was more important than mental health, but both revealed an exposure-response pattern. CONCLUSION: Poor self-reported health within 4 weeks of PCI was associated with adverse outcomes during up to 5 years' follow-up.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention delay for patients living in a peripheral area in Denmark.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), timely primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is superior to thrombolysis and it is the preferred treatment in Denmark. The prognosis depends on the time delay until coronary blood flow is re-established. The purpose of this registry study was to evaluate the PPCI treatment delay of the triage algorithm in a peripheral area in the Region of Central Jutland in the context of European guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1 September 2009 through 31 August 2010, we included all PPCI-treated patients from the catchment area of Regional Hospital Herning (RHH) who were diagnosed with probable STEMI based on the first electrocardiography wirelessly transmitted to the physician on call at RHH after symptom onset. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were included, 77% were males and their median age was 63.4 years. The median distance to the PCI centre was 120.3 (range 63.5-174.2) km. The 2008 European guidelines on transportation delay were fulfilled for 35 (35%) patients and the 2012 European guidelines for seven (7%) patients. Overall, 46% of the patients had a delay from first medical contact to PCI < 120 min., 9% a delay < 90 min. and none a delay < 60 min. CONCLUSION: Our registry study showed that 35% and 7% of PPCI patients from a peripherally located area in Denmark met the 2008 and 2012 European guidelines for an acceptable transport delay to a PCI centre, respectively. Our current PPCI triage strategy therefore needs reconsideration. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

Sex- and age-related differences in clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

AIMS: To compare the outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) according to sex and age, including comparison of sex- and age-specific mortality of PPCI patients with that of the general population. METHODS AND RESULTS: This population-based follow-up study included 7,385 STEMI patients treated with PPCI and 42,965 matched general population controls. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of mortality, reinfarction, and stroke at 30 days, one year, and two years. Women were older and had a more adverse baseline risk profile than men. The risks of the composite endpoint after 30 days, one year, and two years were 9.1%, 16.0%, and 20.0%, respectively, for women compared to 5.8%, 10.6%, and 14.0% for men (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] [30 days]=1.16 [0.95-1.41], adjusted HR [one year]=1.18 [1.02-1.37], and adjusted HR [two years]=1.14 [0.99-1.30]). The risk of an adverse outcome increased similarly among women and men with increasing age. When comparing patients and controls, we found a higher mortality among patients up to 90 days after PPCI. However, after 90 days, the mortality among the PPCI patients was comparable to the mortality in the general population in all sex and age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcome after PPCI was comparable in men and women after controlling for possible confounding. After 90 days post-PPCI, the mortality of treated patients was comparable to the mortality of the general population, independent of sex and age.

Return to work after percutaneous coronary intervention: the predictive value of self-reported health compared to clinical measures.

AIMS: Coronary heart disease is prevalent in the working-age population. Traditional outcome measures like mortality and readmission are of importance to evaluate the prognosis but are hardly sufficient. Ability to work is an additional outcome of clinical and societal significance. We describe trends and predictors of Return To Work (RTW) after PCI and describe a possible benefit using patient-reported measures in risk stratification of RTW. METHODS: A total of 1585 patients aged less than 67 years treated with PCI in 2006-2008 at the Aarhus University Hospital were enrolled. Clinical information was provided through the West Denmark Heart Registry, and 4 weeks after PCI we mailed a questionnaire regarding self-rated health (response rate 83.5%). RTW was defined at weekly basis using extensive register data on transfer payments. Predictors of RTW were analysed as time to event. ROC curves constructed by logistic regression of predicting variables were evaluated by the c-statistic. RESULTS: Four weeks before PCI 50% of the patients were working; the corresponding figures were 25% after 4 weeks, 36% after 12 weeks, and 43% after one year. The patients' self-rated health one month after the procedure was a significant better predictor of RTW compared to other variables including LVEF, both at short (12 weeks) and long (one year) term. CONCLUSIONS: The patient's self-rated health four weeks after the procedure was a stronger predictor than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and consequently useful when patients seek medical advice with respect to RWT.

Dimensions of socioeconomic status and clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The association between low socioeconomic status (SES) and high mortality from coronary heart disease is well-known. However, the role of SES in relation to the clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention remains poorly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 7385 patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Participants were divided into high-SES and low-SES groups according to income, education, and employment status. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) at maximum follow-up (mean, 3.7 years). Low-SES patients had more adverse baseline risk profiles than high-SES patients. The cumulative risk of major adverse cardiac events after maximum follow-up was higher among low-income patients and unemployed patients compared with their counterparts (income: hazard ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.47-1.92; employment status: hazard ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.46-2.10). After adjustment for patient characteristics, these differences were substantially attenuated (income: hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.93-1.33; employment status: hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.56). Further adjustment for admission findings, procedure-related data, and medical treatment during follow-up did not significantly affect the associations. With education as the SES indicator, no between-group differences were observed in the risk of the composite end point. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a tax-financed healthcare system, low-SES patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention face a worse prognosis than high-SES patients. The poor outcome seems to be largely explained by differences in baseline patient characteristics. Employment status and income (but not education level) were associated with clinical outcomes.

Comparison of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in real-world populations versus clinical trial populations.

The efficacy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has been documented in several randomized-controlled trials. We sought to examine the clinical outcome after PPCI of real-world patients eligible and ineligible for inclusion in a randomized trial (DANAMI-2) and to compare it to the outcome of the DANAMI-2 population. We did a population-based follow-up study comparing 1,320 consecutive real-world patients treated with PPCI from 2004 to 2006 to 686 patients treated with PPCI in the DANAMI-2 trial. By reviewing medical records we determined whether the real-world patients were eligible in the DANAMI-2 trial. The real-world population had a more adverse baseline risk profile. Cumulative incidences of the composite end point of all-cause mortality, reinfarction, and stroke after 1 year and 2 years were 17.8% and 22.0%, respectively, in the real-world population compared to 13.6% and 17.3% in the DANAMI-2 population. After adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics and treatment, differences persisted after 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.6) and 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.3). Results for the real-world patients eligible according to DANAMI-2 criteria were comparable to the results from the DANAMI-2 trial. In conclusion, real-world patients had a more adverse baseline prognostic profile and a poorer clinical outcome compared to the DANAMI-2 patients. However, clinical outcome in the real-world patients eligible in the DANAMI-2 trial was comparable to that for the DANAMI-2 patients after invasive and medical treatment.

Five-year cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction in all subjects referred for exercise testing in two Danish counties.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between exercise test results and the 5-year cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction, in patients referred for exercise testing because of known or suspected coronary heart disease. DESIGN: A study of all patients (N = 2763) who in 1996 had an exercise test in two Danish counties (900000 inhabitants). Data and follow-up were based on medical records and general administrative healthcare and population registries. RESULTS: Abnormal tests, compared with normal ones, were associated with an increased adjusted cardiovascular mortality ratio of 1.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-2.63), all-cause mortality ratio of 1.46 (95% CI: 1.11-1.93), and myocardial infarction ratio of 1.71 (95% CI: 1.28-2.28). Inconclusive tests, compared with normal ones, were associated with an increased adjusted all-cause mortality ratio of 1.52 (95% CI: 1.05-2.20) and myocardial infarction ratio of 1.67 (95% CI: 1.12-2.56). A history of myocardial infarction increased the cardiovascular death ratio by 1.51 (95% CI: 1.05-2.16) and the myocardial infarction ratio by 2.39 (95% CI: 1.84-3.10). CONCLUSION: Over a 5-year period, the result of the bicycle exercise test was clearly associated with both mortality and risk of myocardial infarction. An inconclusive test may deserve special attention.

Prescription of anti-anginal drugs in relation to exercise tests and coronary angiography. A 1-year population-based study of two Danish counties.

BACKGROUND: The cardiac diagnostic examination activity in a population should ideally mirror age and gender characteristics of the prevalence of ischemic heart disease. In this study, the prescription of anti-anginal drugs in relation to morbidity and mortality brought on by ischemic heart disease, and in relation to exercise tests and coronary angiography, is analyzed. METHODS: The study population comprised two Danish counties with a total of 896,954 inhabitants. We obtained data on all prescriptions of nitrates, adrenergic beta-antagonists, and calcium channel blockers from regional pharmaceutical registers. Data on all patients who took an exercise test or underwent coronary angiography were derived from regional health authority registers. Data on ischemic heart mortality and on the incidence of myocardial infarction were gathered from the national register of causes of death and hospital registers. RESULTS: Only patients receiving nitrates had an age and gender profile matching that of those who died from ischemic heart disease or who suffered from myocardial infarction (correlation coefficients 0.95-0.99). Judging from the prescription of nitrates, relatively few elderly patients, especially women older than 60-69 years, were referred for a cardiac examination. CONCLUSIONS: The prescription of nitrates seems useful as a surrogate marker for ischemic heart disease. Elderly patients, especially women, seem to be treated with anti-anginal medication without any diagnostic evaluation.

[Research activities of junior physicians]. / Yngre laegers forskningsaktivitet.

INTRODUCTION: Since 1991, the Danish Junior Doctors' Association has carried out annual investigations among its members in regard to education. In 2001, the questionnaire included a special section about scientific activities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The investigation included approximately 70 questions which were sent to all members of the Danish Junior Doctors' Association. A total of 76.2% answered the questionnaire. The age of the junior doctors and the year of graduating are comparable in the investigations from 1993 to 2001. RESULTS: 52.7% of the junior doctors make research in their spare time, and 47.1% have published at least once as primary researcher. The comparison of the investigations from 1993 to 2001 shows a significant fall in the average publications per doctor and in the number of doctors with at least one published paper. From 1999, there were 7% doctors less with one published paper (chi 2 = 53.4; p < 0.001). The average number of published articles per primary researcher has declined from 6.69/doctor in 1993 to 2.48/doctor in 2001 (t = -25.04, p < 0.001). As a whole, 11.9% of all junior doctors had a PhD-degree and 3.0% had a doctor's degree. 7.6% were in the process of a PhD-study. The number of junior doctors with a PhD is significantly rising. The number of doctors seeking positions at universities is less than 2%, the rest seek clinical education and work. DISCUSSION: The publication rate has declined over the past ten years, which has many reasons. One reason is the increasing number of PhD-degrees and an increase in the impact factor, which means qualitative research improvement. A changed procedure in the postgraduate education is a factor as well. The low recruitment of junior doctors for pregraduate education seems to be a constant problem.