RESUMEN
Purpose: To describe a case of an inflammatory macular hole associated with ocular syphilis and its successful surgical closure. Observations: A 55-year-old man presented with count fingers vision and was found to have unilateral ocular syphilis with panuveitis and a foveal subretinal lesion. The inflammation quickly resolved with treatment, but he developed a full-thickness macular hole on day 5. A pars plana vitrectomy with membrane peel and intraocular gas was performed three months later. The macular hole was successfully closed, and the patient's vision improved to 20/200 18 months after repair. Foveal outer retinal atrophy limited final vision improvement. Conclusions and importance: Ocular syphilis can rarely be associated with inflammatory macular holes. Surgical intervention can offer successful anatomic results; however, final visual outcomes may be limited by retinal scarring or atrophy from the original inflammation.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate time trade-off (TTO) utility values in patients with noninfectious uveitis and determine whether patient demographics and clinical characteristics are associated with utility scores. DESIGN: Time trade-off utility analysis. METHODS: Setting: A tertiary care uveitis center in San Francisco, California, USA. PATIENT POPULATION: One hundred and four consecutive adults with noninfectious uveitis, enrolled between November 2016 and February 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: TTO utility values, as collected by an interviewer-guided survey. Information regarding general health, ocular symptoms, and religion was also collected and medical record review was conducted to record anatomic location of uveitis, disease activity, visual acuity, and treatments. Multivariable regression analysis with backward selection was used to identify variables associated with TTO values. RESULTS: Median TTO score was 0.975 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.8-1.0), corresponding to trading a median 1.28 years of remaining life for healthy eyes (IQR: 0-6.29). Regression analysis revealed that worse eye visual acuity, >6 months of oral corticosteroid use, and current antidepressant use were associated with lower TTO scores (P = .008, P = .006, P = .008, respectively), controlling for age and sex. In particular, patients who had been taking oral corticosteroids for more than 6 months, regardless of dose, were 10.5 times more likely to trade 20% or more years of remaining life (TTO ≤0.8) than patients not taking oral corticosteroids (95% confidence interval: 2.3, 48.1; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with noninfectious uveitis had measurable, though modest, reductions in quality of life, as assessed by TTO, and these decreases were significantly associated with visual acuity in the worse eye and long-term oral corticosteroid use.
Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida/psicología , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Uveítis/psicología , Administración Oral , Adulto , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Uveítis/fisiopatología , Agudeza Visual/fisiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe clinical outcomes associated with the use of topical difluprednate in treating uveitic cystoid macular edema. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: Setting: Medical record review in a tertiary care uveitis center. PATIENT POPULATION: Fifty-eight patients (72 eyes) with uveitic cystoid macular edema (CME) treated with difluprednate 0.05% ophthalmic solution between June 2012 and May 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Macular central subfield thickness (CST) determined by optical coherence tomography, improvement of CME (≥20% reduction in CST or resolution), and resolution of CME (CST ≤ 320 µm with no cysts) at 30 days after starting treatment. Outcomes were assessed up to 90 days. RESULTS: CST on average decreased by 17% (95% CI: -33%, -7%) for eyes using only difluprednate (n = 43) and by 6% (95% CI: -17%, -2%) for eyes in patients using concomitant systemic immunosuppressive therapy (n = 29) at 30 days, a 12% difference between groups (95% CI: 2%, 21%, P = .02). Of eyes on difluprednate alone, 76% had improvement and 48% had resolution of CME. In patients using systemic therapy, 37% of eyes had improvement and 17% had resolution. Eight eyes (11%) had an intraocular pressure (IOP) > 24 mm Hg within the first 30 days. By 90 days, CME had improved in 69% of all eyes and resolved in 43% of eyes, with only 9 patients starting or increasing systemic immunosuppressive medications and 2 patients receiving periocular corticosteroid injections. CONCLUSIONS: Difluprednate was associated with an improvement in uveitic CME and could be a reasonable first-line therapy. IOP should be closely monitored.
Asunto(s)
Fluprednisolona/análogos & derivados , Mácula Lútea/patología , Uveítis/tratamiento farmacológico , Agudeza Visual , Adulto , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Fluprednisolona/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Soluciones Oftálmicas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uveítis/complicaciones , Uveítis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes in quality of life in noninfectious uveitis patients treated with 2 of the most commonly prescribed antimetabolite treatments. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicenter, block-randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Eighty patients at Aravind Eye Hospitals in Madurai and Coimbatore, India, with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis were randomized to receive oral methotrexate, 25 mg weekly, or oral mycophenolate mofetil, 1 g twice daily, and were followed up monthly for 6 months. Best-corrected visual acuity, Indian Vision Function Questionnaire (IND-VFQ), and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) were obtained at enrollment and at 6 months (or prior, in the event of early treatment failure). RESULTS: IND-VFQ scores, on average, increased by 9.2 points from trial enrollment to 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.9, 13.5, P = .0001). Although the SF-36 physical component summary score did not significantly differ over the course of the trial, the mental component summary score decreased by 2.3 points (95% CI: -4.4, -0.1, P = .04) and the vitality subscale decreased by 3.5 points (95% CI: -5.6, -1.4, P = .001). Quality-of-life scores did not differ between treatment arms. Linear regression modeling showed a 3.2-point improvement in IND-VFQ score for every 5-letter improvement in visual acuity (95% CI: 1.9, 4.3; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although uveitis treatment was associated with increased vision and vision-related quality of life, patient-reported physical health did not change after 6 months of treatment, and mental health decreased. Despite improved visual outcomes, uveitis patients receiving systemic immunosuppressive therapy may experience a deterioration in mental health-related quality of life.