Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Adm Policy Ment Health ; 44(2): 243-257, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26860953

RESUMEN

To describe state responses to psychotropic medication safety concerns among children in foster care, this study proposes a taxonomy for state-level psychotropic medication monitoring mechanisms and highlights state variations. Seventy-two key informants, representing state child-serving agencies within the 50 states and DC, completed semi-structured interviews. We employed modified grounded theory to develop the taxonomy, and then generated state-specific summaries that were validated by key informants. Nationally, 88.2 % of the states employed at least one of seven mechanisms. For the most frequently implemented mechanisms (collegial secondary review, prior authorization, database review), over half were implemented between January 2011 and July 2013.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Monitoreo de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados en el Hogar de Adopción/organización & administración , Cuidados en el Hogar de Adopción/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/tratamiento farmacológico , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Planes Estatales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estados Unidos
3.
Adm Policy Ment Health ; 43(1): 52-66, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25711392

RESUMEN

Considerable attention is being given to the use of research evidence to inform public policy making. Building upon Weiss's model of research utilization, we examined the types and uses of evidence that child welfare administrators used in response to federal policy reforms requiring psychotropic medications oversight for children in foster care. Participants relied on a range of "global" and "local" evidence types throughout the policy development phase. Global research evidence was used to raise awareness about problems associated with psychotropic medication use. Local evidence helped to contextualize concerns and had problem-solving and political uses. In most states, policy actions were informed by a combination of evidence types.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Protección Infantil , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Cuidados en el Hogar de Adopción , Política de Salud , Formulación de Políticas , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Servicios de Salud Mental , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA