Incidence of Acquired Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Finland: A 4-Year Prospective Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence and epidemiologic characteristics of acquired nontraumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI) in Finland. DESIGN: Prospective 4-year epidemiologic multicenter study. SETTING: Two of the 3 spinal cord injury (SCI) centers in Finland responsible for acute care, immediate rehabilitation, and lifelong follow-up for all SCI patients in a population of 3,073,052 (as of 2013). PARTICIPANTS: All newly diagnosed NTSCI patients (N=430) admitted to Tampere University Hospital between 2012 and 2015 and Oulu University Hospital between 2013 and 2016 based on the evaluation of the designated rehabilitation teams. Patients with NTSCI resulting from congenital etiologies or progressive neurologic diseases were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and variables, according to the International SCI Core Data Set and the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI, including etiology and the severity of injury. RESULTS: The incidence of NTSCI was 54.1 per million per year. NTSCI was more common in men (n=260, 60.5%) than women (n=170, 39.5%). The mean age was 62.0±14.6 years old. Degenerative causes were the most common etiology (n=219, 50.9%), followed by malignant (n=88, 20.5%) and benign (n=41, 9.5%) neoplasms. The injury resulted in tetraplegia in 177 patients (41.1%) and paraplegia in 249 patients (57.9%). American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade D injuries were common, with an incidence of 71% (n=304). Specialized inpatient rehabilitation was needed in 44% (n=189) of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: There are no previous studies on the epidemiology of NTSCI in Finland, and international reporting has been limited. The incidence of NTSCI in our study was substantially higher than in most previous studies, which was likely owing to our study including individuals with less severe lesions who did not require inpatient rehabilitation.

Long-term Posttraumatic Survival of Spinal Fracture Patients in Northern Finland.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective epidemiological study. OBJECTIVE: To reveal the long-term survival and causes of death after traumatic spinal fracture (TSF) and to determine the possible factors predicting death. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Increased mortality following osteoporotic spinal fracture has been represented in several studies. Earlier studies concerning mortality after TSF have focused on specific types of fractures, or else only the mortality of the acute phases has been documented. In-hospital mortality has varied between 0.1% and 4.1%. METHODS: The study sample of 947 patients including all patients with TSF admitted to Oulu University Hospital, Finland, between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011. TSFs were identified using International Classification of Diseases 10th revision or Nordic Classification of Surgical Procedures codes and all patient records were manually reviewed. Times and causes of death, obtained from Statistics Finland's Archive of Death Certificates, were available until the end 2016 and 2015, respectively. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up 227 (24.0%) had died. Mortality was 6.8% after the first year and 19.1% after 5 years. Mortality was increased in all age groups compared with the general population, 1-year standardized mortality ratios ranging from 3.1 in over 65-year-olds to 19.8 in under 30-year-olds. In age groups of 50 to 64 years and over 65 years, the most important risk factors for death were males with hazard ratios of 3.0 and 1.6, respectively, and low fall as trauma mechanism with hazard ratios of 9.4 and 10.2, respectively. CONCLUSION: Traumatic spinal fractures are associated with increased mortality compared with the general population, high mortality focusing especially on older people and men. The increase seems to be comparable to the increase following hip fracture. Patients who sustain spinal fracture due to falling need special attention in care, due to the observation that low fall as trauma mechanism increased the risk of death significantly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Traumatic Spinal Injuries in Northern Finland.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective epidemiological study. OBJECTIVE: To reveal incidence and epidemiological features of traumatic spinal injuries (TSI) in Northern Finland. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In Finland the annual incidence of traumatic spine fractures requiring inpatient care has been found to be 27/100,000, while international incidences have varied across the range of 16-64/100,000. More specific epidemiological data from Finland is not available. Internationally, the most common mechanisms of injury are road traffic as well as low and high falls. Associated injuries occur in 30% to 55% of cases. METHODS: The study sample included patients with traumatic spinal injury admitted to Oulu University Hospital (OYS) with injury between the January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011. Patient information was collected from the hospital care register, including all inpatient and outpatient visits and surgical procedures. Traumatic spinal column and spinal cord injuries were identified using International Classification of Diseases 10th revision or Nordic Classification of Surgical Procedures codes and all patient records were manually reviewed. RESULTS: Nine hundred seventy-one patients met the criteria for TSI. The mean annual incidence of hospitalized traumatic spinal injuries was 26/100,000 in the whole of Northern Finland and 35/100,000 in the OYS main responsibility area. The most frequent etiology of TSI was low falls, which accounted for 35.8% of the injuries, followed by road traffic and high falls. Lumbar spine was the most common site of the fracture. Spinal surgery was performed in 376 (38.7%) cases. Three hundred eight patients (31.7%) suffered from associated injuries, 101 (10.4%) had a spinal cord injury, and 71 (7.3%) a brain injury. CONCLUSION: Low falls in elderly and road traffic injuries in younger age groups were the most common etiology of traumatic spinal injuries in Northern Finland and should be given more attention in primary prevention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.