Effect of prestroke antiplatelets use on first-ever ischaemic stroke severity and early outcome.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate whether prior use of antiplatelet agents (AP) may be associated with lower severity and improved short-term outcome of the first-ever acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS: This was a retrospective, case-control study based on a prospective hospital stroke registry covering consecutive acute stroke patients admitted to a single stroke centre in highly urbanised area (Warsaw, Poland) between 1995 and 2013. Patients receiving oral anticoagulants were excluded from the analysis. Statistical analysis included multiple regression and logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, diabetes, coronary heart disease and history of myocardial infarction. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 3036 eligible patients, of whom 879 (29%) received AP before stroke onset. Patients from the AP group were older and more often burdened with stroke risk factors. There were no differences in baseline stroke severity, hospital mortality and proportion of patients alive and independent at discharge. However, AP turned out to be independently associated with lower NIHSS score on admission (ß = -0.045, p = 0.008) and increased odds for being alive and independent at discharge (odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13-1.67) and decreased odds for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.77, 95% CI: 0.59-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide further evidence supporting modest benefit of AP therapy on the course and outcome of first-ever ischaemic stroke. Further large studies are needed to confirm this effect.

Use of biologics for psoriasis in Central and Eastern European countries.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of biological agents for the treatment of psoriasis and to explore country-specific differences within six Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, namely Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania. METHODS: A literature overview on the epidemiology and disease burden of psoriasis in CEE was conducted. The number of patients treated with biologics was obtained from patient registries, ministries of health, national professional societies and health insurance funds. Biological treatment rates were estimated by two different methods: (i) as a proportion of all psoriasis patients of a country (assuming a common prevalence of psoriasis 2%) and (ii) per 100,000 population. Moreover, we provide a detailed comparison of drug coverage policies and guidelines regulating the treatment with biologics in psoriasis. RESULTS: On average 0.25% of all psoriasis patients, or five psoriasis patients out of 100,000 inhabitants are treated with biologics embedding a 14.6-fold difference between the six countries. Bulgaria, Croatia and Poland lag behind the other three countries in the use of biologics. The significant differences among CEE countries cannot be explained by variations in prices of biologics, cost-effectiveness or budget impact of biologics. It seems that the time since coverage decision, the fewer number of covered biologics, the more restrictive criteria to be eligible for covered treatment in terms of baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores, and the maximum duration of treatment allowed are responsible for the majority of the differences. CONCLUSIONS: There exists a disconnect between the European psoriasis treatment guidelines and the various CEE country-specific biologic coverage eligibilities. The cost of biologic therapy for psoriasis is not solely and directly responsible for the different use rates amongst the CEE countries. Psoriasis may not be perceived by all payers as a serious disease that can be successfully treated in a cost-effective manner.

A multinational, multi-centre, observational, cross-sectional survey assessing diabetes secondary care in Central and Eastern Europe (DEPAC Survey).

AIMS: The objective of this study was to assess diabetes care in outpatient diabetes clinics in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. METHODS: Questionnaires for each randomly enrolled patient were completed by an endocrinologist or diabetologist. Data concerning age, sex, diabetes duration, diabetes type, treatment type, glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), blood pressure (BP) and short- and long-term diabetes complications were recorded. Questionnaires were analysed centrally for each country and stratified for Type 1 diabetes (T1D), Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and other types of diabetes. RESULTS: Data on 10 950 individuals were analysed (mean population age 56.2 years; females 52%; T1D 22.9%; T2D 75.3%; mean time from diagnosis 11 years). Patients with HbA(1c) within target (< 6.5%): T1D 13.1%, T2D 21.4%; for TC levels (< 4.5 mmol/l): T1D 37%, T2D 20%; for TG levels (< 1.7 mmol/l): T1D 78%, T2D 44%; for HDL-C (> 1.1 mmol/l): T1D 81%, T2D 60%; for LDL-C (< 2.5 mmol/l): T1D 36%, T2D 23%; for BP (< 130/80 mm Hg): T1D 42%, T2D 9%. The prevalence of severe hypoglycaemia (within the last 6 months) was 12% in T1D and 2% in T2D. Prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis was 0.3-6.6%, blindness 0.15-1.3% and diabetic nephropathy 19-42%. CONCLUSIONS: The data show the current quality of care and potential areas for improvement. The quality of care is generally comparable with that in Western Europe.

Eligibility of stroke units in Poland for administration of intravenous thrombolysis.

Systemic thrombolysis treatment was approved in Poland in 2003 and should be performed in specialist stroke units (SU). We performed a survey to determine stroke service preparedness for thrombolysis treatment in Poland. We sent a questionnaire evaluating the neurological departments in Poland, where stroke patients are treated. We divided them into four categories: (i) class A SU (fulfilling criteria of the National Program for Stroke Prevention and Therapy and European Stroke Initiative guidelines), (ii) class B (conditionally fulfilling criteria), (iii) class C (not fulfilling criteria), and (iv) departments without SU. Only class A units are eligible for implementing thrombolysis. We obtained response from 194 of 222 (87.4%) departments; 90 (46.4%) declared having an SU. According to criteria, 20 class A, 56 class B, 14 class C. During one year, 71 208 patients were admitted to hospitals; 69,982 (98.2%) to neurological departments. A total of 10,959 (15.4%) were treated in class A SU, 23,650 (33.2%) in class B, 5153 (7.2%) in class C, whereas 30,220 (42.4%) in neurological departments without SU. Our survey showed that only 15.4% stroke patients in Poland are admitted to high-quality SU, where thrombolysis may potentially be administered. Improvement of SU quality in Poland is necessary for wide implementation of new methods of stroke therapy.