Boron neutron capture therapy as a larynx-preserving treatment for locally recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after conventional radiation therapy: A preliminary report.

OBJECTIVE: Laryngeal preservation and a radical cure are the treatment goals for laryngeal carcinoma, and larynx-preserving therapy is generally preferred for early-stage laryngeal carcinoma. When laryngeal carcinoma recurs locally, patients are often forced to undergo total laryngectomy, resulting in loss of vocal function. However, many patients with laryngeal carcinoma who have residual or recurrent disease after radiotherapy wish to preserve their voice. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility of using BNCT as a larynx-preserving treatment for residual or recurrent laryngeal carcinomas following radical irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 15 patients who underwent BNCT for residual or recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radical laryngeal carcinoma irradiation. The number of treatment sessions for all patients was one irradiation. Before BNCT, the recurrent laryngeal carcinoma stage was rT1aN0, rT2N0, rT2N1, rT3N0, rT3N1, and rT4aN0 in one, six, one, three, one, and three patients, respectively. The median maximum tumor diameter before BNCT was 15 mm (8-22 mm). All patients underwent a tracheostomy before BNCT to mitigate the risk of upper airway stenosis due to laryngeal edema after BNCT. Treatment efficacy was evaluated retrospectively using monthly laryngoscopy after BNCT and contrast-enhanced CT scans at 3 months. The safety of treatment was evaluated based on examination findings and interviews with patients. RESULTS: The median hospital stay after BNCT was 2 days (1-6). The response rate at three months after BNCT in 15 patients with locally recurrent laryngeal carcinoma was 93.3 %, and the CR rate was 73.3 %. The most frequent adverse event associated with BNCT was laryngeal edema, which occurred in nine patients the day after BNCT. The average course of laryngeal edema peaked on the second day after BNCT and almost recovered after 1 week in all patients. One patient had bilateral vocal fold movement disorders. None had dyspnea because of prophylactic tracheostomy. No grade four or higher adverse events occurred. Other grade 2 adverse events included pharyngeal mucositis, diarrhea, and sore throat. Three months after BNCT, tracheostomy tubes were removed in nine patients, retinal cannulas were placed in three patients, and voice cannulas were placed in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: BNCT for locally recurrent laryngeal carcinoma can safely deliver radical irradiation to tumor tissues, even in patients undergoing radical irradiation. BNCT has shown antitumor effects against recurrent laryngeal carcinoma. However, further long-term observations of the treatment outcomes are required.

Preliminary outcomes of boron neutron capture therapy for head and neck cancers as a treatment covered by public health insurance system in Japan: Real-world experiences over a 2-year period.

PURPOSE: Since June 2020, boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) has been a health care service covered by health insurance in Japan to treat locally advanced or recurrent unresectable head and neck cancers. Therefore, we aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of BNCT as a health insurance treatment and explore its role among the standard treatment modalities for head and neck cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who were treated using BNCT at Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, between June 2020 and May 2022. We assessed objective response rates based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and adverse events based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Additionally, we conducted a survival analysis and explored the factors that contributed to the treatment results. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (72 treatments) were included in the study, with a median observation period of 15 months. The objective response rate was 80.5%, and the 1-year locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 57.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.9%-68.3%), 42.2% (95% CI: 30.1%-53.8%), and 75.4% (95% CI: 62.5%-84.5%), respectively. Locoregional control was significantly longer in patients with earlier TNM staging and no history of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: BNCT may be an effective treatment option for locally advanced or recurrent unresectable head and neck cancers with no other definitive therapies. If definitive surgery or radiation therapy are not feasible, BNCT should be considered at early disease stages.

Application of stoichiometric CT number calibration method for dose calculation of tissue heterogeneous volumes in boron neutron capture therapy.

BACKGROUND: Monte Carlo simulation code is commonly used for the dose calculation of boron neutron capture therapy. In the past, dose calculation was performed assuming a homogeneous mass density and elemental composition inside the tissue, regardless of the patient's age or sex. Studies have shown that the mass density varies with patient to patient, particularly for those that have undergone surgery or radiotherapy. A method to convert computed tomography numbers into mass density and elemental weights of tissues has been developed and applied in the dose calculation process using Monte Carlo codes. A recent study has shown the variation in the computed tomography number between different scanners for low- and high-density materials. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the elemental composition inside each calculation voxel on the dose calculation and the application of the stoichiometric CT number calibration method for boron neutron capture therapy planning. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulation package Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System was used for the dose calculation. Firstly, a homogeneous cubic phantom with the material set to ICRU soft tissue (four component), muscle, fat, and brain was modelled and the NeuCure BNCT system accelerator-based neutron source was used. The central axis depth dose distribution was simulated and compared between the four materials. Secondly, a treatment plan of the brain and the head and neck region was simulated using a dummy patient dataset. Three models were generated; (1) a model where only the fundamental materials were considered (simple model), a model where each voxel was assigned a mass density and elemental weight using (2) the Nakao20 model, and (3) the Schneider00 model. The irradiation conditions were kept the same between the different models (irradiation time and irradiation field size) and the near maximum (D1%) and mean dose to the organs at risk were calculated and compared. RESULTS: A maximum percentage difference of approximately 5% was observed between the different materials for the homogeneous phantom. With the dummy patient plan, a large dose difference in the bone (greater than 12%) and region near the low-density material (mucosal membrane, 7%-11%) was found between the different models. CONCLUSIONS: A stoichiometric CT number calibration method using the newly developed Nakao20 model was applied to BNCT dose calculation. The results indicate the importance of calibrating the CT number to elemental composition for each individual CT scanner for the purpose of BNCT dose calculation along with the consideration of heterogeneity of the material composition inside the defined region of interest.

A Japanese multi-institutional phase II study of moderate hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with image-guided technique for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multi-institutional phase II study was to confirm the safety and the potential efficacy of moderately hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with prostate-based image-guidance for Japanese patients. METHODS: Patients with low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer were eligible. Patients with a part of high risk (having only one of the following factors, cT3a, 20 < PSA ≤ 30, or GS = 8 or 9) were also included. Hypofractionated IMRT using daily image-guided technique with prostate matching was performed with a total dose of 70 Gy in 28 fractions. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for 4-8 months was mandatory for patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. RESULTS: From 20 institutions, 134 patients enrolled. The median follow-up was 5.16 years (range, 1.43-6.47 years). The number of patients with low, intermediate, and high-risk prostate cancer was 20, 80, and 34, respectively. The 5-year overall, biochemical failure-free, and clinical failure-free survival was 94.5%, 96.0%, and 99.2%, respectively. The 5-year biochemical failure-free survival for patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease was 94.1%, 97.4%, and 93.9%, respectively. The incidences of grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) late toxicities at 5 years were 5.3% and 5.3%, respectively. There are no acute or late toxicities ≥ grade 3. Of 124 patients who were followed for up to 5 years, the grade 2 late GU or GI toxicities were 10.5% (90% confidence intervals, 6.3-16.2%, p = 0.0958). CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy of moderately hypofractionated IMRT with prostate-based image-guidance was confirmed among Japanese patients with prostate cancer.

Safety of Boron Neutron Capture Therapy with Borofalan(10B) and Its Efficacy on Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: Real-World Outcomes from Nationwide Post-Marketing Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the real-world safety and efficacy of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) with borofalan(10B) in Japanese patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent head and neck cancer (LA/LR-HNC). METHODS: This prospective, multicenter observational study was initiated in Japan in May 2020 and enrolled all patients who received borofalan(10B) as directed by regulatory authorities. Patient enrollment continued until at least 150 patients were enrolled, and adverse events attributable to drugs, treatment devices, and BNCT were evaluated. The patients with LA/LR-HNC were systematically evaluated to determine efficacy. RESULTS: The 162 patients enrolled included 144 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), 17 patients with non-SCCHN (NSCCHN), and one patient with glioblastoma. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hyperamylasemia (84.0%), stomatitis (51.2%), sialoadenitis (50.6%), and alopecia (49.4%) as acute TRAEs, and dysphagia (4.5%), thirst (2.6%), and skin disorder (1.9%) as more common late TRAEs. In patients with LA/LR-HNC, the overall response rate (ORR) was 72.3%, with a complete response (CR) in 63 (46.0%) of 137 patients with SCCHN. Among 17 NSCCHN patients, the ORR was 64.7%, with eight cases (47.1%) of CR. One- and two-year OS rates in patients with recurrent SCCHN were 78.8% and 60.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This post-marketing surveillance confirmed the safety and efficacy of BNCT with borofalan(10B) in patients with LA/LR-HNC in a real-world setting.

Out-of-field dosimetry using a validated PHITS model and computational phantom in clinical BNCT.

BACKGROUND: The out-of-field radiation dose for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT), which results from both neutrons and γ-rays, has not been extensively evaluated. To safely perform BNCT, the neutron and γ-ray distributions inside the treatment room and the whole-body dose should be evaluated during commissioning. Although, certain previous studies have evaluated the whole-body dose in the clinical research phase, no institution providing BNCT covered by health insurance has yet validated the neutron distribution inside the room and the whole-body dose. PURPOSE: To validate the Monte Carlo model of the BNCT irradiation room extended for the whole-body region and evaluate organ-at-risk (OAR) doses using the validated model with a human-body phantom. METHODS: First, thermal neutron distribution inside the entire treatment room was measured by placing Au samples on the walls of the treatment room. Second, neutron and gamma-ray dose-rate distributions inside a human-body water phantom were measured. Both lying and sitting positions were considered. Bare Au, Au covered by Cd (Au+Cd), In, Al, and thermoluminescent dosimeters were arranged at 11 points corresponding to locations of the OARs inside the phantom. After the irradiation, γ-ray peaks emitted from the samples were measured by a high-purity germanium detector. The measured counts were converted to the reaction rate per unit charge of the sample. These measurements were compared with results of simulations performed with the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS). A male adult mesh-type reference computational phantom was used to evaluate OAR doses in the whole-body region. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted doses and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for each OAR were evaluated. The median dose (D50% ) and near-maximum dose (D2% ) were evaluated for 14 OARs in a 1-h-irradiation process. The evaluated RBE-weighted doses were converted to equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions. RESULTS: Experimental results within 60 cm from the irradiation center agreed with simulation results within the error bars except at ±20, 30 cm, and those over 70 cm corresponded within one digit. The experimental results of reaction rates or γ-ray dose rate for lying and sitting positions agreed well with the simulation results within the error bars at 8, 4, 11, 7 and 7, 4, 7, 6, 5, 6 out of 11 points, respectively, for Au, Au+Cd, In, Al, and TLD. Among the detectors, the discrepancies in reaction rates between experiment and simulation were most common for Au+Cd, but were observed randomly for measurement points (brain, lung, etc.). The experimental results of γ-ray dose rates were systematically lower than simulation results at abdomen and waist regions for both positions. Extending the PHITS model to the whole-body region resulted in higher doses for all OARs, especially 0.13 Gy-eq increase for D50% of the left salivary gland. CONCLUSION: The PHITS model for clinical BNCT for the whole-body region was validated, and the OAR doses were then evaluated. Clinicians and medical physicists should know that the out-of-field radiation increases the OAR dose in the whole-body region.