Diagnosis, Management And Prevention Of Hepatitis C In Pakistan 2017.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Since the advent of direct acting antiviral agents, there is a revolutionary change in the management of HCV infection. Newer drugs with different mechanism of action are being introduced and are expected to be available in coming few months in Pakistan as well. The main purpose of the guideline is to review and induct the latest research in field of HCV infection in Pakistani perspective so that our healthcare professionals can apply the new recommendations in timely and judicial manner. Target groups of guidelines are general physicians treating hepatitis C, hepatologists and gastroenterologists. Other beneficiaries of these guidelines are public health institutions of Pakistan, which provide free treatment to deserving patients under National Hepatitis Prevention and Control Program and Pakistan Bait-ul- Mal Program. METHODOLOGY: These guidelines are based on the review of National consensus practice guidelines: Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Hepatitis C Pakistan 2009. Published data in National and International Journals searched with the help of Google search and pub med, and 2015-16 guidelines of HCV by AASLD, EASL, APASL and WHO. Local studies are preferably added with references to enhance the Pakistani perspective. Evidence was also taken from published studies. Recommendations have been based upon evidence from national publications on the subject and scientific presentations at national liver meeting as well from experts' personal experience and opinion.

Role Of Generics In Treatment Of Hepatitis C Infection.

With the discovery of newer and newer DAAs, the cure of Hepatitis C seems to be a reality. But their high price and availability is a big hindrance. Sofosbuvir launched by Gilead costs about $ 84000 per 12-week course. Since its launch there is a huge debate regarding the complex pricing mechanism of DAAs. The pricing involves negotiation of patent holder with health insurance companies through their Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs). Several rebates are also involved in this pricing mechanism amongst which only few are declared ones. Different countries are adapting different strategies to overcome this pricing issue. The branded companies have also issued licenses to companies to form generic version of the drugs and to market them to selected middle and low income countries. Few countries that are not in the list have rejected the patent and started producing their own generics. It is due to these generics that the price of DAAs had undergone a significant reduction but their manufacturing and efficacy needs regular scrutiny.

Sofosbuvir For The Treatment Of Hepatitis C Genotype 3 Infected Patients In Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the viral responses of patients with chronic infection of Hepatitis C virus treated with sofubuvir. METHODS: This Quasi experimental study was conducted at Centre for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi from September 2014 to September 2016. 502 patients with HCV genotype 3 including treatment naive, non-responders or relapsers to previous interferon based therapy along with patients having decompensated cirrhosis (child class B or C) were included in the study. All patients were treated with Sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily along with Ribavirin for 6 months. Follow-up qualitative PCR (polymerase Chain Reaction) were performed at 4 weeks interval to assess RVR (Rapid virological Response), end of treatment to determine ETR (End of treatment response) and 3 months post treatment to determine SVR12 (Sustained viral response at 12 week). RESULTS: 91% of the patients had become PCR negative at completion of four weeks of treatment with Sofosbuvir, whereas at completion of treatment 96.5% had attained a negative PCR. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks post therapy (SVR12) was attained in 85.5% of patients. No statistically significant associations were found with attainment status of RVR, ETR and SVR based on previous treatment status or presence of Decompensated liver disease. However, attainment of SVR was slightly more in females (p value=0.03). The serological profiles of patients whether they attained PCR at week 4, 24 of treatment or 12 weeks' post treatment did not exhibit any statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Sofosbuvir is effective in eradicating hepatitis C virus irrespective of previous treatment or liver fibrosis status in genotype 3 HCV Pakistani patients.

Safety of non-anaesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation in ERCP.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Propofol is increasingly being used for sedation purposes during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This study aimed to evaluate the safety of non-anaesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP) during therapeutic ERCP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients, who underwent ERCP at Centre for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, were included in the study. Propofol sedation was administered by a physician who was a non-anaesthesiologist certified in basic and advanced cardiac life support. The total study duration was 6 months. The primary outcome variable was the frequency of any sedation-related complication. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients (41% males and 59% females) were enrolled in the study. The mean propofol dose used during the procedure was 201±132 mg. The mean propofol dose, when adjusted to weight and duration of procedure, was 0.05±0.04 mg kg(-1)min(-1). According to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, 136 (87%) patients were placed in ASA class I and II and 20 (13%) patients were of ASA class III. Only two patients developed sedation-related complication: one minor requiring bag-mask ventilation and other major requiring mechanical ventilation via endotracheal intubation. Both were managed by the trained non-anaesthesiologist and gastroenterologist at the place of procedure. No patients required cardiopulmonary resuscitation and admission to the intensive care unit. There were no sedation-related deaths. CONCLUSION: NAAP sedation can be considered safe for low-risk patients (ASA class I and II) undergoing ERCP. The presence of a trained anaesthetist is advisable in high-risk patients (ASA class III and higher) with significant co-morbidities.