Highly sensitive and rapid tandem bioluminescent immunoassay using aequorin labeled Fab fragment and biotinylated firefly luciferase.

We established a simultaneous bioluminescent assay utilizing aequorin (Aq) and biotinylated firefly luciferase (b-Luc); furthermore, we developed a highly sensitive and rapid tandem bioluminescent immunoassay (BLIA) involving the Aq-labeled Fab fragment and b-Luc-streptavidin complex. Minimum detection limits of Aq and b-Luc were 9.4x10(-21) mol assay(-1) (blank + 3 S.D.) and 3.6x10(-19) mol assay(-1) (blank + 3 S.D.), respectively. Measurements of two luminescent proteins were completed in 4 s with a single assay medium. In this study, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and prostate specific antigen (PSA), which served as analytes, were measured in the tandem BLIA. PAP and PSA were detected by the Aq-labeled anti-Dig Fab fragment and b-Luc-streptavidin complex, respectively. The measurable ranges of PAP and PSA were 0.04-100 and 0.2-200 ng mL(-1), respectively. This technique was also applied to the simultaneous measurement of PSA and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Measurable ranges of PSA and AFP were 0.2-200 and 1.95-1000 ng mL(-1), respectively. Levels of PAP and PSA or PSA and AFP in human serum could be accurately determined with the proposed BLIA. Satisfactory correlations were observed between results obtained from the proposed BLIA and those derived from commercial kits.

Detection limit estimated from slope of calibration curve: an application to competitive ELISA.

This paper theoretically derives a general rule that while the slope of the semi-logarithmic plot (Y vs. log X) of a calibration curve varies depending on analyte concentration, X, the slope takes a specific value at the detection limit (L(D)). This rule holds good irrespective of the shape of the calibration curve (linear or non-linear) and in this paper, is applied to competitive ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay). The following relationship is deduced: slope of log-dose B/B0 at L(D) = [relative standard deviation (RSD) of blank responses] / 0.13. The L(D) obtained from the above-mentioned slope corresponds to the dose at which the RSD of dose estimates is 0.3 (= 30%). A commercial kit for 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone is taken as an example.

An expression of within-plate uncertainty in sandwich ELISA.

This paper puts forward a method to describe an equation of the within-plate uncertainty (relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) of measurements) as a function of analyte concentration in sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A kit for thyroid stimulating hormone is taken as an example. The pipetting procedures of analyte solution and chromogen-substrate solution and absorbance inherent to the wells of a microplate are identified as major error sources and their variability is included as parameters in the uncertainty equation. These parameters can be determined by the experiments with distilled water. The theoretical R.S.D. is shown to be in good agreement with the results of the repeated experiments using the real samples. Since the theory gives a continuous plot of R.S.D. against concentration, the uncertainty structure of the ELISA kit can be recognized over a wide concentration range and the detection limit and quantitation range can easily be determined on the plot.

Precision, limit of detection and range of quantitation in competitive ELISA.

This paper develops a mathematical model for describing the within-plate variation as the RSD (relative standard deviation) of absorbance measurements in a wide concentration range in competitive ELISA and proposes a method for determining the limit of detection (LOD) and range of quantitation (ROQ). The ELISA for 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone is taken as an example. The theoretical RSD description involves analyte concentration as an independent variable and error sources as parameters which concern the pipetting and absorbance measurement. Our model can dispense with repeated experiments of real samples, but the error parameters should be determined experimentally. The theory is in good agreement with the experiments. The most influential error sources at low and high sample concentrations are shown to be the pipetting of a viscous solution of antiserum and the absorbance inherent to the wells of a plate, respectively. The LOD and ROQ are defined as the concentration with 30% RSD and the region with <10% RSD, respectively, and are found in the theoretical plot of the RSD of concentration estimates vs concentration.