Real-World Outcomes of Subsequent Chemotherapy after Progression Following Chemoradiation and Consolidative Durvalumab Therapy in Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis from the CRIMSON Study (HOPE-005).

BACKGROUND: The optimal subsequent treatment strategy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and consolidative durvalumab therapy remains unknown. We aimed to determine the optimal subsequent treatment strategy for this clinical population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 523 consecutive patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CRT and analyzed the treatment outcomes of subsequent therapy after progression following CRT and consolidative durvalumab therapy. Patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors as subsequent therapy were excluded. RESULTS: Out of 122 patients who received subsequent chemotherapy, 55% underwent platinum-based, 25% non-platinum-based, and 20% immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing therapies. In the platinum-based group, patients with a durvalumab-progression-free survival (Dur-PFS) ≥ 1 year had a significantly longer median subsequent therapy-PFS (SubTx-PFS) than those with Dur-PFS < 1 year (13.2 months vs. 4.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.97; P = .04). Furthermore, among patients receiving non-platinum-based chemotherapy, the median SubTx-PFS was longer in the combined with angiogenesis inhibitor group than in the without group, although the difference was not statistically significant. No significant difference of SubTx-PFS was observed between the reason for durvalumab discontinuation and the outcomes of ICI-containing therapy. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge is frequently employed following progression subsequent to CRT and consolidative durvalumab therapy for LA-NSCLC. Optimal treatment strategies may consider Dur-PFS and angiogenesis inhibitor feasibility. Further research is warranted to identify clinical biomarkers that can help identify patients who would benefit from ICI rechallenge.

Impact of body surface area on efficacy and safety in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer treated with osimertinib as a first-line treatment.

BACKGROUND: The most recommended treatment for stage IV EGFR-positive lung cancer is osimertinib monotherapy. The dosage of osimertinib is fixed at 80 mg/day regardless of body surface area (BSA), however some patients withdraw or reduce the dosage due to adverse events (AEs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 98 patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who received 80 mg osimertinib as the initial treatment. We investigated the impact of BSA on efficacy and safety of osimertinib. RESULTS: The cut-off value of BSA was estimated using the receiver operating characteristics curve, and was determined to be 1.5 m2. There were 44 patients in the BSA < 1.5 group and 54 patients in the BSA ≥ 1.5 group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs (hematologic toxicity of ≥grade 3 or higher, and non-hematologic toxicity of ≥grade 3) between the two groups. However, the incidence of dose reduction due to AEs was significantly higher in the BSA < 1.5 group compared with the BSA ≥ 1.5 group (16 patients vs 5 patients, p = 0.003). The main reasons were fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, and liver disfunction. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different (16.9 months in the BSA < 1.5 group vs 18.1 months in the BSA ≥ 1.5 group, p = 0.869). CONCLUSION: Differences in BSA affected the optimal dose of osimertinib. However, the PFS with osimertinib treatment was not affected by BSA. Therefore, when using osimertinib as an initial treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, dose reduction to control AEs should be considered, especially in the BSA<1.5 group.

Feasibility of atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination regimens in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and lung cancer taking direct oral anticoagulants.

AIM: Atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) combination immunotherapy regimens and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are both associated with bleeding. Therefore, combining Atezo/Bev regimens with DOACs may exacerbate the bleeding risk. This study investigated the feasibility of the Atezo/Bev regimen in patients taking DOACs. METHODS: This retrospective study included 141 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or advanced lung cancer (LC) treated with Atezo/Bev regimens. Patients who used antithrombotic agents other than DOACs were excluded. Bleeding events during the Atezo/Bev regimen were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence rates of bleeding of any grade in the DOAC (n = 11) and no antithrombotic agent (NAA) (n = 130) groups were 9.1% and 10.8%, respectively, with no significant differences. Moreover, no significant difference was found in the frequency of bleeding of grade ≥3 between the DOAC and NAA groups. No patients in the DOAC group discontinued the Atezo/Bev regimen because of severe bleeding. Although serum albumin levels, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.298 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.105-0.847), independently contributed to bleeding events (p = 0.023), DOAC administration did not (HR: 1.357; 95% CI: 0.157-10.54; p = 0.770). Among only patients with HCC (n = 59), none of the five patients taking DOACs experienced bleeding events. A high albumin-bilirubin score (HR: 9.083, 95% CI: 1.118-73.76) was associated with bleeding events (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: DOACs did not have a considerable effect on bleeding events in the Atezo/Bev regimens for HCC or LC. Under careful surveillance for bleeding, Atezo/Bev regimens may be feasible in patients receiving DOACs.

Telisotuzumab Vedotin Monotherapy in Patients With Previously Treated c-Met Protein-Overexpressing Advanced Nonsquamous EGFR-Wildtype Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Phase II LUMINOSITY Trial.

PURPOSE: Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is a c-Met-directed antibody-drug conjugate with a monomethyl auristatin E cytotoxic payload. The phase II LUMINOSITY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03539536) aimed to identify the optimal c-Met protein-overexpressing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population for treatment with Teliso-V (stage I) and expand the selected group for efficacy evaluation (stage II). Stage II enrolled patients with nonsquamous epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-wildtype NSCLC. METHODS: Eligible patients had locally advanced/metastatic c-Met protein-overexpressing NSCLC and ≤2 previous lines of therapy (including ≤1 line of systemic chemotherapy). c-Met protein overexpression in nonsquamous EGFR-wildtype NSCLC was defined as ≥25% tumor cells with 3+ staining (high [≥50% 3+]; intermediate [≥25%-<50%]). Teliso-V was administered at 1.9 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) by independent central review. RESULTS: In total, 172 patients with nonsquamous EGFR-wildtype NSCLC received Teliso-V in stages I and II. ORR was 28.6% (95% CI, 21.7 to 36.2; c-Met high, 34.6% [95% CI, 24.2 to 46.2]; c-Met intermediate, 22.9% [95% CI, 14.4 to 33.4]). The median duration of response was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 11.3; c-Met high, 9.0 [95% CI, 4.2 to 13.0]; c-Met intermediate: 7.2 [95% CI, 5.3 to 11.5]). The median overall survival was 14.5 months (95% CI, 9.9 to 16.6; c-Met high, 14.6 [95% CI, 9.2 to 25.6]; c-Met intermediate, 14.2 [95% CI, 9.6 to 16.6]). The median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 6.9; c-Met high, 5.5 [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.3]; c-Met intermediate: 6.0 [95% CI, 4.5 to 8.1]). Most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (30%), peripheral edema (16%), and fatigue (14%); the most common grade ≥3 AE was peripheral sensory neuropathy (7%). CONCLUSION: Teliso-V was associated with durable responses in c-Met protein-overexpressing nonsquamous EGFR-wildtype NSCLC, especially in those with high c-Met. AEs were generally manageable.

Clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR Exon20 in-frame insertions in the near-loop and far-loop: Results from LC-SCRUM-Asia.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we explored the clinical outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR Exon20 in-frame insertions (Exon20ins), and the impact of the location of Exon20ins on these clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The efficacies of current systemic therapies in NSCLC patients harboring Exon20ins were investigated using a large-scale clinico-genomic database of LC-SCRUM-Asia, and compared with that of amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS trial. RESULTS: Of the 11,397 patients enrolled in LC-SCRUM-Asia, Exon20ins were detected in 189 patients (1.7 %). Treatment with classical EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (classical TKIs) was associated with a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients with Exon20ins as compared with Exon19 deletions and L858R. Post platinum-based chemotherapy, classical TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were associated with a shorter PFS than with docetaxel in patients with Exon20ins (HR [95 % CI]; TKIs vs docetaxel, 2.16 [1.35-3.46]; ICIs vs docetaxel, 1.49 [1.21-1.84]). Patients treated with amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS trial showed a risk reduction in PFS and overall survival as compared with LC-SCRUM-Asia patients treated with docetaxel, classical TKIs, or ICIs. Among the 189 patients, Exon20ins were classified as near-loop or far-loop insertions in 115 (61 %) and 56 (30 %) patients, respectively. Treatment with osimertinib was associated with a longer PFS in patients with Exon20ins in near-loop as compared with far-loop (median, 5.6 vs. 2.0 months; HR [95 % CI], 0.22 [0.07-0.64]). CONCLUSIONS: After platinum-based chemotherapy, classical TKIs and ICIs are less effective in NSCLC patients with Exon20ins, and amivantamab may be a promising targeted therapy. There is a possibility that the location of Exon20ins has an impact on the efficacy of TKIs.

Exceptionally long-lasting response to dabrafenib plus trametinib treatment in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma harboring the BRAF V600E mutation with high expression of PD-L1: A case report.

We present a patient with lung adenocarcinoma showing high PD-L1 expression and BRAF V600E mutation, who achieved a remarkable long-term response to the combination therapy of dabrafenib and trametinib (DT treatment) after disease progression on immunotherapy. This case may provide an opportunity for clinicians to consider the order of administration of immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy for BRAF V600E-positive lung cancer.

Prognostic impact of clinical and radiological factors on leptomeningeal metastasis from solid cancers.

PURPOSE: The number of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) patients has increased in recent years, as the cancer survival rates increased. An optimal prediction of prognosis is essential for selecting an appropriate treatment. The European Association of Neuro-Oncology-European Society for Medical Oncology (EANO-ESMO) guidelines for LM proposed a classification based on the cerebrospinal fluid cytological findings and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pattern. However, few studies have validated the utility of this classification. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of LM, including the radiological and cytological types. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 240 adult patients with suspected LM who had undergone lumbar puncture between April 2014 and September 2021. RESULTS: The most common primary cancer types were non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (143 (60%)) and breast cancer (27 (11%)). Positive cytology results and the presence of leptomeningeal lesions on contrast-enhanced MRI correlated with decreased survival in all patients. Nodular lesions detected on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance were a poor prognostic factor in cytology-negative patients, while contrast-enhanced patterns had no prognostic significance in cytology-positive patients. Systemic therapy using cytotoxic agents and molecular-targeted therapy after LM diagnosis correlated with prolonged survival, regardless of the cytology results. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment and systemic chemotherapy after LM improved the survival of EGFR-mutated and wild-type NSCLC patients with positive cytology results. CONCLUSIONS: This study validated the efficacy of prognostication according to the EANO-ESMO guidelines for LM. Systemic therapy after LM diagnosis improves the survival of NSCLC patients.

Clinical application of the Lung Cancer Compact PanelTM using various types of cytological specimens in patients with lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Lung Cancer Compact PanelTM (compact panel) is a gene panel that can detect driver alterations with high sensitivity in liquid samples, including tumor cells. This study examined the ability of a compact panel to detect genetic mutations in liquid specimens used in clinical practice. METHODS: Three cohorts, bronchoscopic biopsy forceps washing (washing cohort), pleural effusion (pleural cohort), and spinal fluid (spinal cohort), were analyzed using the compact panel. Liquid samples were added into the GM (Genemetrics) tubes and analyzed. The washing cohort assessed the concordance rate of gene panel analysis outcomes in tissue specimens derived from the primary tumor. Meanwhile, the pleural cohort investigated the impact of storing specimens for 8 weeks and more on nucleic acid and mutation detection rates. RESULTS: In the washing cohort (n = 79), the concordance rate with mutations detected in tissues was 75/79 (94.9 %). This rate reached 100 % when focusing solely on driver alterations for treatment. The pleural cohort (n = 8) showed no deterioration in nucleic acid quality or quantity after 8 weeks of storage in GM tubes. Similarly, in the spinal cohort (n = 9), spinal fluid with malignant cells exhibited driver alterations similar to those in the primary tumor. These findings underscore the efficacy of the compact panel in accurately identifying genetic mutations in different liquid specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The compact panel is a reliable tool for detecting driver alterations in various cytological specimens. Its consistent performance across diverse sample types emphasizes its potential for guiding targeted therapies for patients with lung cancer and enhancing precision medicine approaches.

Potent CTLs can be induced against tumor cells in an environment of lower levels of systemic MFG-E8.

The direction and magnitude of immune responses are critically affected when dead cells are disposed of. Milk fat globule-epidermal growth factor-factor 8 (MFG-E8) promotes the engulfment of apoptotic normal and cancerous cells without inducing inflammation. We have previously reported that a certain proportion of the cancer cells express abundant MFG-E8, and that such expression is associated with the shorter survival of patients with esophageal cancer who had received chemotherapy before surgery. However, the influence of tumor-derived and systemically existing MFG-E8 on antitumor immune responses has not yet been fully investigated. Herein, we showed that CTL-dependent antitumor immune responses were observed in mice with no or decreased levels of systemic MFG-E8, and that such responses were enhanced further with the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody. In mice with decreased levels of systemic MFG-E8, the dominance of regulatory T cells in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was inverted to CD8+ T cell dominance. MFG-E8 expression by tumor cells appears to affect antitumor immune responses only when the level of systemic MFG-E8 is lower than the physiological status. We have also demonstrated in the clinical setting that lower levels of plasma MFG-E8, but not MFG-E8 expression in tumor cells, before the treatment was associated with objective responses to anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. These results suggest that systemic MFG-E8 plays a critical role during the immunological initiation process of antigen-presenting cells to increase tumor-specific CTLs. Regulation of the systemic level of MFG-E8 might induce efficient antitumor immune responses and enhance the potency of anti-PD-1 therapy.

RELAY, Erlotinib Plus Ramucirumab in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated, Metastatic NSCLC: Outcomes by EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Variants.

Introduction: EGFR gene mutations are drivers of NSCLC. The RELAY double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3 study revealed superior progression-free survival (PFS) for ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) versus PBO (PBO + ERL) in patients with untreated advanced NSCLC and an EGFR-activating mutation. This exploratory analysis evaluated potential associations between EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del) variants and clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients (N = 449) were randomized (1:1) to RAM plus ERL or PBO plus ERL. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, on treatment, and at 30-day post-study treatment discontinuation follow-up. Baseline and treatment-emergent gene alterations were investigated by Guardant360 next-generation sequencing. Patients with a valid baseline plasma sample and ex19del were included (RAM + ERL, n = 62; PBO + ERL, n = 72). Results: The most common ex19del variant was E746_A750del (67.2%); EGFR E746 deletions (E746del) occurred more frequently than L747 deletions (74.6% versus 25.4%, respectively). TP53 mutations were the most frequently co-occurring baseline gene alterations. With treatment arms combined, median PFS was 18.0 months versus 12.5 months for patients with uncommon (non-E746_A750del, n = 44) versus common (E746_A750del, n = 90) ex19del variants (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.657 [95% confidence interval or CI:1.044-2.630]). Median PFS was longer with RAM plus ERL versus PBO plus ERL for patients with the common (15.2 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.564 [95% CI: 0.344-0.926]) and E746del (15.4 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.587 [95% CI: 0.363-0.951]) variants. Treatment-emergent post-progression EGFR T790M rates were higher in the common versus uncommon and E746del versus L747 deletion subgroups. Conclusions: RAM plus ERL provides benefit and improves treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic NSCLC with EGFR ex19del variants.

The phase I/II eNRGy trial: Zenocutuzumab in patients with cancers harboring NRG1 gene fusions.

Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) fusions are oncogenic drivers that have been detected in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and other solid tumors. NRG1 fusions are rare, occurring in less than 1% of solid tumors. Patients with NRG1 fusion positive (NRG1+) cancer have limited therapeutic options. Zenocutuzumab is a novel, bispecific IgG1 antibody that targets both HER2 and HER3 proteins and inhibits NRG1 binding through a 'Dock & Block®' mechanism of action. Here, we describe the rationale and design of the phase II component of the eNRGy trial, part of the overall, open-label phase I/II, multicenter trial exploring the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity and antitumor activity of zenocutuzumab in patients with NRG1+ NSCLC, PDAC or other solid tumors.

eNRGy: a clinical trial of zenocutuzumab for cancer caused by NRG1 gene fusionsNRG1 gene fusions are rare mutations that cause cancer cells to grow. These fusions are found in many different types of cancer. Tumors with NRG1 gene fusions do not respond well to standard treatment options. Zenocutuzumab, or Zeno, is a treatment that is being tested to see if it can stop cancer that is growing because of NRG1 gene fusions. Here, we describe the reasoning for and design of an ongoing clinical trial (eNRGy) designed to study the efficacy (how well it works) and safety of Zeno in patients with cancer that has NRG1 gene fusions. The eNRGy trial is recruiting patients with cancer that has NRG1 gene fusions, including non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and others. Patients who join this trial will receive Zeno once every 2 weeks until their cancer grows. The main goal (primary end point) of this trial is to determine the percentage of patients whose tumors decrease in size by 30% or more. The eNRGy trial is currently enrolling patients. For more information, refer to ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02912949), visit https://nrg1.com/, or call 1-833-NRG-1234.

Real-world outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab and pembrolizumab with platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy (NICT) and pembrolizumab with chemotherapy (PCT) are commonly used in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Compared with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy, ICI combination therapy can increase immune-related toxicity instead of prolonging survival. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of NICT and PCT to decide on the favorable treatment. METHODS: We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent NICT or PCT between December 2018 and May 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed with the variables age, sex, smoking status, performance status, stage, histology, and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival for the matched patients. RESULTS: Six hundred consecutive patients were included. After PSM, 81 and 162 patients were enrolled in the NICT and PCT groups, respectively. The baseline characteristics were well-balanced. The median progression-free survival was equivalent (11.6 vs. 7.4 months; P = 0.582); however, the median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the NICT group than in the PCT group (26.0 vs. 16.8 months; P = 0.005). Furthermore, OS was better in PD-L1-negative patients who underwent NICT than in those who underwent PCT (26.0 vs. 16.8 months; P = 0.045). Safety profiles did not differ significantly in terms of severe adverse event and treatment-related death rates (P = 0.560, and 0.722, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data suggests that NICT could be a favorable treatment option compared with PCT for patients with advanced NSCLC. Further follow-up is needed to determine the long-term prognostic benefit.

Atezolizumab and Platinum Plus Pemetrexed With or Without Bevacizumab for Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The combination of an antibody to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or to its ligand (PD-L1) with chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Bevacizumab is expected to enhance the efficacy not only of chemotherapy but also of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies through blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated immunosuppression, but further data are needed to support this. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab administered with platinum combination therapy and atezolizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants: An open-label phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 37 hospitals in Japan. Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without genetic driver alterations or those with genetic driver alterations who had received treatment with at least 1 approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor were enrolled between January 20, 2019, and August 12, 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either atezolizumab plus carboplatin with pemetrexed (APP) or atezolizumab, carboplatin plus pemetrexed, and bevacizumab (APPB). After 4 cycles of induction therapy, maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or with atezolizumab, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab was administered until evidence of disease progression, development of unacceptable toxic effects, or the elapse of 2 years from the initiation of protocol treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Results: A total of 412 patients were enrolled (273 men [66%]; median age, 67.0 [range, 24-89] years) and randomly assigned, with 205 in the APPB group and 206 in the APP group of the ITT population after exclusion of 1 patient for good clinical practice violation. The median BICR-assessed PFS was 9.6 months with APPB vs 7.7 months with APP (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07; 1-sided stratified log-rank test; P = .92). According to prespecified subgroup analysis of BICR-assessed PFS, an improved PFS with APPB vs APP was apparent specifically in driver oncogene-positive patients (median, 9.7 vs 5.8 months; stratified HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98). Toxic effects related to bevacizumab were increased in the APPB group. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this trial did not show superiority of APPB over APP for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC; however, this regimen showed a similar tolerability and improved survival relative to APP in patients with driver oncogenes. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT2080224500.