Outcomes of Busulfan, Fludarabine, and 400 cGy Total Body Irradiation Compared With Busulfan and Fludarabine Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients With Hematologic Diseases: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens decrease the risk for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in adult patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies but increase the risk for relapse. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of fludarabine-total body irradiation (TBI) with fludarabine among patients with hematologic diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study of 137 patients with different hematologic malignancies compared the outcomes of 63 patients who received a conventional RIC regimen with 2 days of IV busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/d × 2 days) and fludarabine with 74 patients who received the same regimen plus 400 cGy of fludarabine and busulfan (FB)-TBI divided in 2 doses over 1 day (200 cGy BID). Median follow-up was 4.62 years. RESULTS: The donors were either HLA-matched siblings (36%) or HLA-matched unrelated donors (64%). The FB-TBI showed trends toward improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) over FB (5-year PFS rates 50% vs 34%, P = .06, and 5-year OS rate 53% vs 39%, P = .13). Acute graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD), relapse, and NRM were similar between the 2 groups. The 5-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was lower in the FB-TBI group compared with the FB group (29% vs 52%, P = .003). Multivariable analysis revealed that grade III-IV aGVHD was the only independent risk factor for worse OS (P = .001) in both groups. A high disease risk index was possibly associated with inferior OS (P = .07) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The FB-TBI is a safe and effective intensified RIC regimen for adult patients with hematologic malignancies. It predicted a lower risk for cGVHD and showed possibly improved PFS and OS compared with FB.

Phase I neoadjuvant study of intravesical recombinant fowlpox-GM-CSF (rF-GM-CSF) or fowlpox-TRICOM (rF-TRICOM) in patients with bladder carcinoma.

Intravesical BCG is a highly effective treatment for high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer and carcinoma in situ (CIS); however, for patients who are either resistant or become unresponsive to BCG therapy there is a need for alternative treatment approaches. This study examined the safety and feasibility of intravesically administered recombinant fowlpox virus encoding GM-CSF (Arm A) or TRICOM (Arm B); and the local and systemic immunologic responses generated to the vector(s). Twenty bladder cancer patients scheduled for cystectomy as their standard of care received preoperatively four weekly doses of intravesical recombinant fowlpox. Treatment was well tolerated, however, three patients experienced transient elevations of liver transaminases, with one rising to the level of a DLT. Cystectomy derived tumor and normal bladder mucosa demonstrated mRNA for the virally encoded LacZ gene supporting effective infection/transfection. Detected serum antibody to the LacZ encoding ß-galactosidase indicated successful expression of vector-encoding gene products and the ability to immunize via the bladder site. H&E and IHC using a panel of immune cell specific antigens demonstrated immune cell infiltration of the bladder wall. These findings demonstrate good safety profile, successful infection/transfection, ability to generate systemic immune response, and local recruitment of immune cell populations with intravesical administration of fowlpox-based constructs encoding for GM-CSF(rF-GM-CSF) or TRICOM (rF-TRICOM), and support further evaluation of this treatment modality for bladder cancer.

Intravesicular Cidofovir in the Treatment of BK Virus-Associated Hemorrhagic Cystitis Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Background: BK virus hemorrhagic cystitis (BKV-HC) is a common complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT); optimal management remains uncertain. Supportive care (bladder irrigation and blood transfusions) and intravenous and intravesicular cidofovir have all been used with varying success. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of intravesicular cidofovir for BKV-HC following HSCT. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all HSCT patients with BKV-HC prescribed intravesicular cidofovir from 2012 to 2017. Results: 33 patients were treated for BKV-HC. The median age was 50 years (range 23-73), and 18 (55%) were male. The median HC symptom severity was 2, with a median BK urine viral load pretreatment of 100,000,000 IU/mL. Patients received a median of 2 intravesicular treatments (range 1-7) at a dosage of 5 mg/kg per instillation. In all, 19 (59%) patients demonstrated complete clinical resolution of symptoms; 9 (28%) had a partial response; and 4 (13%) had no change in symptoms. Patients with a high pretreatment BK viral load (>100 million) and high HC grade (2-4) had a lower frequency of complete remission. The main side effect of intravesicular instillation was severe bladder spasms in 4 patients (12%). Conclusion and Relevance: This is the largest study of intravesicular cidofovir treatment of BKV HC reported to date; 88% of patients with BVK-HC achieved clinical improvement of symptoms with minimal side effects. Clinical trials of intravesicular cidofovir could provide further evidence for this treatment for BKV-HC.

A single center retrospective analysis of a protocol for high-dose methotrexate and leucovorin rescue administration.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate has a wide dosing range. High-dose methotrexate is a dose of 1000 mg/m2 or greater. In the 1970s, the incidence of mortality associated with High-dose methotrexate ranged from 4.6 to 6%. In 2012, the University of Maryland Medical Center implemented a standardized high-dose methotrexate protocol. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the institution followed recommendations based on the Bleyer nomogram for the administration of high-dose methotrexate more closely after the implementation of the protocol. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, 37 patients received 119 cycles of high-dose methotrexate before the protocol implementation (1 January 2009 through 31 December 2010) and 45 patients received 106 cycles of high-dose methotrexate after protocol implementation (1 January 2013 through 31 December 2014). Patient characteristics, protocol data, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Protocol implementation significantly reduced the deviation of methotrexate level timing at 24, 48, and 72 h: median 7.47 vs. 1.46 h, 7.23 vs. 1.35 h, and 7.00 vs. 1.52 h before and after implementation, respectively (p < 0.0001 for each). The protocol significantly reduced deviation of the first dose of leucovorin administration: median 5.2 vs. 0.675 h before and after implementation, respectively (p<0.0001). After protocol implementation, there was an increase in the use of leucovorin prescriptions written appropriately for patients discharged before methotrexate levels reached a value of ≤0.05 µmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a protocol for the administration of high-dose methotrexate improved the adherence to consensus recommendations. Further analysis is needed to assess clinical pharmacist involvement and the cost savings implications within this protocol.

Instituting Vincristine Minibag Administration: An Innovative Strategy Using Simulation to Enhance Chemotherapy Safety.

The first fatal incident of wrong-route administration of vinca alkaloids occurred in 1968. Initial recommendations for practice change occurred in 2005. In 2012, 54% of oncology treatment sites had changed their practice. The authors' institution has developed a safe, adaptable, and consistent process to prepare, deliver, and administer vinca alkaloids by means of a minibag delivery. A multidisciplinary team, including representatives from the nursing and pharmacy departments, reviewed the literature and developed all processes, including staff education. Minibag administration began in August 2015, and more than 2063 doses have been administered without any extravasations. To date, the simulation strategy for education is effective, and the delivery system is safe.

Phase I study of pazopanib in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR), dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib, an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-Kit, in combination with paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pazopanib was given daily with weekly paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Dose levels of pazopanib (mg/day)/paclitaxel (mg/m(2)) were 400/15, 800/15, 800/50, and 800/80. An expanded cohort was enrolled at the MTR. Plasma samples were collected to evaluate the effect of pazopanib, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4, on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, a CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 substrate. RESULTS: Of 26 enrolled patients, 17 were treated at the MTR of 800 mg pazopanib and 80 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities included a grade 3 abscess and grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia. Other toxicities included elevated liver transaminases and diarrhea. Six patients (23%) had partial responses and 15 patients (58%) had stable disease. Administration of 800 mg pazopanib resulted in a 14% lower paclitaxel clearance and a 31% higher paclitaxel maximal concentration than with administration of paclitaxel alone at 15, 50, and 80 mg/m(2). At the MTR, coadministration of 800 mg pazopanib and 80 mg/m(2) paclitaxel resulted in a 26% higher geometric mean paclitaxel area under the curve. CONCLUSION: Pazopanib, at a dose of 800 mg daily, can be safely combined with a therapeutic dose of paclitaxel at 80 mg/m(2) when administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days. The observed greater plasma concentrations of paclitaxel given concurrently with pazopanib suggest that pazopanib is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8.

Low-molecular-weight heparin in cancer-associated thrombosis: treatment, secondary prevention, and survival.

OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs more frequently in cancer patients than in non-cancer patients and outcomes are poor in patients with both cancer and thrombosis. Patients with cancer who develop thrombosis are more likely to experience a recurrence of VTE and have increased bleeding complications while receiving oral anticoagulant treatment. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the causes and outcomes of thrombosis in cancer patients, the limitations of warfarin therapy, the guidelines and data for the use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in the treatment and secondary prevention of thrombosis in cancer patients, and emerging data regarding survival with the use of LMWH in cancer patients. METHODS: Literature for this paper has been collected using multiple sources, including primary, secondary, and tertiary references. Online searches have been conducted utilizing the PubMed and OVID databases, and abstracts from the Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exhibition. The following key terms were used in the search: cancer, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, anticoagulation, LMWHs, guidelines, survival, cost. RESULTS: The long-term use of LMWHs in the settings of cancer and thrombosis are supported by recent clinical trial evidence that demonstrate their equivalent safety and improved efficacy when compared to oral anticoagulants resulting in their inclusion in current guidelines. Finally, newer studies offer further evidence of improved outcomes with dalteparin and nadroparin, including possible survival benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with LMWHs has been shown to be more effective than warfarin in the extended treatment of VTE in patients with cancer and is safe in this setting. Use of a LMWH for at least the first 3-6 months of long-term treatment is now considered the standard of care for patients with cancer and is recommended in numerous guidelines. Additionally, further evaluation of the survival benefits of LMWH in cancer patients is warranted.