The effects of tapentadol and oxycodone on central processing of tonic pain.

OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated differences between opioids to experimental tonic pain in healthy men. METHODS: Twenty-one males participated in this cross-over-trial. Interventions twice daily were oxycodone (10 mg), tapentadol (50 mg) and placebo for 14 days. Tonic pain was induced on day 1, 4 and 14 by immersing the hand in 2 °C water for 120 s. Electroencephalography was recorded during test pain at baseline and after 14 days. Spectral analysis and source localization were investigated in predefined frequency bands. RESULTS: A decreased perception of pain on day 4 persisted throughout the 14 days compared to baseline (p < 0.006). Oxycodone decreased the electroencephalography spectral power in the delta and theta bands and increased power in the alpha1, alpha2 and beta1 bands (p < 0.03). Tapentadol increased spectral power in the alpha1 band (p < 0.001). Source localization revealed that oxycodone decreased activity of the temporal and limbic region in the delta band, and frontal lobe in the alpha2 and beta1 bands, whereas tapentadol decreased alpha1 band activity in the temporal lobe compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Oxycodone and tapentadol reduced pain perception and changed the central processing of tonic pain. SIGNIFICANCE: Different mechanisms of action were involved, where oxycodone affected cortical structures more than tapentadol.

Tapentadol results in less deterioration of gastrointestinal function and symptoms than standard opioid therapy in healthy male volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Tapentadol is a combined opioid agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with fewer gastrointestinal side effects at equianalgesic doses compared with classical strong opioids. Previous studies on tapentadol have included multi-morbid patients in whom confounders exclude detailed assessment of the mechanistic effects and strict comparison with other opioids or placebo. This study aimed at investigating the effects of tapentadol and oxycodone on gastrointestinal motility and gastrointestinal side effects. METHODS: 21 healthy males participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Tapentadol (50 mg twice daily), oxycodone (10 mg twice daily), or placebo tablets were administered for 14 days. Segmental gastrointestinal transit times and colonic motility parameters were measured with electromagnetic capsules. Gastrointestinal side effects were assessed using questionnaires. KEY RESULTS: During dosing with tapentadol, gastrointestinal side effects and motility parameters were on placebo level. Compared with tapentadol, oxycodone increased whole gut transit time by 17.9 hours (p = .015) and rectosigmoid transit time by 6.5 hours (p = .005). Compared with tapentadol, oxycodone also reduced long, fast antegrade colonic movements (p = .001). In comparison with placebo, oxycodone prolonged whole gut transit time by 31.6 hours, (p < .001). Moreover, less long, fast antegrade colonic movements (p = .002) were observed during oxycodone. For oxycodone only, slow colonic movements were associated with gastrointestinal side effects. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: In this mechanistic study, tapentadol caused significantly less colonic dysmotility and gastrointestinal side effects as compared with oxycodone in equianalgesic doses.

Diabetic Neuropathy Influences Control of Spinal Mechanisms.

PURPOSE: Comprehensive evaluation of the upstream sensory processing in diabetic symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN) is sparse. The authors investigated the spinal nociceptive withdrawal reflex and the related elicited somatosensory evoked cortical potentials. They hypothesized that DSPN induces alterations in spinal and supraspinal sensory-motor processing compared with age- and gender-matched healthy controls. METHODS: In this study, 48 patients with type 1 diabetes and DSPN were compared with 21 healthy controls. Perception and reflex thresholds were determined and subjects received electrical stimulations on the plantar site of the foot at three stimulation intensities to evoke a nociceptive withdrawal reflex. Electromyogram and EEG were recorded for analysis. RESULTS: Patients with DSPN had higher perception (P < 0.001) and reflex (P = 0.012) thresholds. Fewer patients completed the recording session compared with healthy controls (34/48 vs. 21/21; P = 0.004). Diabetic symmetrical polyneuropathy reduced the odds ratio of a successful elicited nociceptive withdrawal reflex (odds ratio = 0.045; P = 0.014). Diabetic symmetrical polyneuropathy changed the evoked potentials (F = 2.86; P = 0.025), and post hoc test revealed reduction of amplitude (-3.72 mV; P = 0.021) and prolonged latencies (15.1 ms; P = 0.013) of the N1 peak. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that patients with type 1 diabetes and DSPN have significantly changed spinal and supraspinal processing of the somatosensory input. This implies that DSPN induces widespread differences in the central nervous system processing of afferent A-δ and A-ß fiber input. These differences in processing may potentially lead to identification of subgroups with different stages of small fiber neuropathy and ultimately differentiated treatments.

Peripheral, synaptic and central neuronal transmission is affected in type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: We hypothesized that adults with type 1 diabetes and severe polyneuropathy have alterations in neuronal transmission at different anatomical levels. The aims were to investigate upstream sensory neuronal activation in terms of peripheral, spinal, precortical, and cortical transmission. METHODS: 48 participants with type-1 diabetes and polyneuropathy, and 21 age-matched healthy participants were included. Electrophysiological median nerve recordings were used to analyze peripheral transmission at Erb's point (P9-N11); spinal evoked potentials at Cv7 (P11-N14); subcortical evoked potentials at Oz (N14-P18); early cortical evoked potentials at CP5 (N20-P22); late cortical evoked potentials at C1 (N60-P80) and estimated cortical inter-peak latencies as measures of central conduction time. RESULTS: In comparison to healthy, the presence of diabetes prolonged peripheral transmission at P9 and N11 (+0.49 ms, p = .000; +0.47 ms, p = .04, respectively), early cortical evoked potentials at CP5: N20 (+2.41 ms, p = .003) and P22 (+5.88 ms, p = .001) and cortical potentials at C1: N60 (+39.08 ms, p = .001) and P80 (+54.55 ms, p = .000) and central conduction time. Decreased amplitudes were shown peripherally (-2.13 µV, p = .000), spinally (-0.57 µV, p = .005) and pre-cortically (-0.22 µV, p = .004). In both healthy and people with diabetes increased central conduction time were associated with decreased parasympathetic tone (ρ = -0.52, p = .027; ρ = -0.35, p = .047, respectively). CONCLUSION: Neuronal afferent transmission and brain responses were significantly impaired in diabetes and the presence of prolonged central conduction time is indicative of severe extensive neuronal damage. Trial registry number: EUDRA CT: 2013-004375-12; clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02138045.

Effects of Vortioxetine and Escitalopram on Electroencephalographic Recordings - A Randomized, Crossover Trial in Healthy Males.

The antidepressant drug vortioxetine has a multimodal action modulating neurotransmission through inhibition of the serotonin transporter and modulation of serotonin receptors. Vortioxetine has also been shown to alleviate cognitive symptoms in preclinical studies and in patients with depression. However, it is largely unclear how vortioxetine affects the brain processing in humans. The present study was conducted in 32 healthy males in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, active comparator, four-way crossover design. Treatments were 10 and 20 mg/day vortioxetine, 15 mg/day escitalopram, and placebo, administered orally once daily for three days. Results were compared to placebo. Treatment effect was assessed by recording spontaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and 40 Hz auditory steady state responses. For the spontaneous EEG, both vortioxetine and escitalopram decreased the frequency content in the theta band (4-8 Hz) and increased power in the beta (12-32 Hz) and gamma (32-45 Hz) bands. Vortioxetine and escitalopram decreased connectivity during rest in the theta band and increased connectivity in the gamma bands. Finally, both treatments caused decreased power in the evoked gamma band in response to 40 Hz auditory stimulation. Although the global EEG changes were comparable between vortioxetine and escitalopram, subtle differences between treatment effects on the EEG in terms of effect size and regional distribution of the EEG changes were apparent. To our knowledge, the current results are the first data on how vortioxetine affects EEG in humans. The present study calls for further investigations addressing the possible electrophysiological and cognitive effects of vortioxetine.

Offset analgesia is not affected by cold pressor induced analgesia.

Background and aims Offset analgesia (OA) is a pain modulating mechanism described as a disproportionately large decrease in pain intensity evoked by a minor decrease in stimulus intensity. Precise mechanisms of OA are still not elucidated and studies are needed to evaluate factors modulating OA. The aim of this study was to investigate OA before and during tonic cold pain (thought to induce descending inhibition), in a group of healthy volunteers. Methods A randomized, crossover study was performed in 17 healthy participants (8 males and 9 females). The OA paradigm lasted 35 s and was induced by the traditional method using thermal stimulation applied to the forearm. A constant control heat stimulus (CTL) paradigm was used as control to assess adaptation. Pain intensity was assessed continuously. For induction of tonic cold pain, the participants immersed their hand into 2°C water for 2 min. After 1 min and 25 s, the heat stimulation (OA or CTL paradigm) was repeated to assess the modulatory effect of the cold pressor test. Results It was possible to induce OA both before and during the cold pressor test. Tonic cold pain modulated the peak pain reported during both the OA (p=0.015) and CTL paradigms (p=0.001) reflecting endogenous pain modulation. However, the magnitude of OA was not modulated by tonic cold pain (p>0.05). Conclusions The offset analgesia magnitude was not modulated by simultaneously tonic cold pain, thought to reflect another endogenous pain modulation mechanism. Implications Neither offset analgesia magnitude nor adaptation were modulated by cold pressor induced endogenous analgesia. This could be explained by the fact, that offset analgesia was already at maximum in healthy participants. Hence, offset analgesia may not be a suitable assessment tool to investigate modulation induced by experimental methods or pharmacology in healthy participants.

Pharmacological modulation of colorectal distension evoked potentials in conscious rats.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral evoked potentials (CEP) induced by colorectal distension (CRD) in conscious rats provides a novel method in studies of visceral sensitivity. The aim of this study was to explore the pharmacological effect on CEP of compounds known to reduce the visceromotor response to CRD. METHODS: Epidural electrodes were chronically implanted in eight female Sprague-Dawley rats. Evoked potentials were elicited by colorectal rapid balloon distensions (100 ms, 80 mmHg) and the effect of WIN55 (cannabinoid CB receptor agonist), clonidine (adrenergic α2 receptor agonist), MPEP (mGluR5 receptor antagonist), pregabalin (ligand of α2δ subunits in voltage-gated calcium channels) and baclofen (GABA-B receptor agonist) on amplitudes and latency of CEP were determined. RESULTS: WIN55 (0.1 µmol kg-1), clonidine (0.05 µmol kg-1), MPEP (10 µmol kg-1) and pregabalin (200 µmol kg-1) caused a significant, p < 0.05, reduction of the N2 to P2 peak-to-peak amplitude by 23 ±â€¯8%, 25 ±â€¯8%, 39 ±â€¯5%, and 47 ±â€¯6% respectively. Baclofen (9 µmol kg-1) induced a prolongation of the N2 peak latency of 18 ±â€¯4% but had no significant effect on the amplitudes. CONCLUSION: The obtained results suggest that MPEP, WIN55, clonidine, and pregabalin reduce visceral nociceptive input to the brain, whereas the lack of effect of baclofen on CRD evoked CEP amplitudes suggest that the effect on VMR is not due to a direct analgesic effect. Brain responses to colorectal distension provide a useful tool to evaluate pharmacological effects in rats and may serve as a valuable preclinical model for understanding pharmacological mechanisms related to visceral sensitivity.

Animal models of pancreatitis: can it be translated to human pain study?

Chronic pancreatitis affects many individuals around the world, and the study of the underlying mechanisms leading to better treatment possibilities are important tasks. Therefore, animal models are needed to illustrate the basic study of pancreatitis. Recently, animal models of acute and chronic pancreatitis have been thoroughly reviewed, but few reviews address the important aspect on the translation of animal studies to human studies. It is well known that pancreatitis is associated with epigastric pain, but the understanding regarding to mechanisms and appropriate treatment of this pain is still unclear. Using animal models to study pancreatitis associated visceral pain is difficult, however, these types of models are a unique way to reveal the mechanisms behind pancreatitis associated visceral pain. In this review, the animal models of acute, chronic and un-common pancreatitis are briefly outlined and animal models related to pancreatitis associated visceral pain are also addressed.

Translational aspects of rectal evoked potentials: a comparative study in rats and humans.

Inconsistencies between species has stunted the progress of developing new analgesics. To increase the success of translating results between species, improved comparable models are required. Twelve rats received rectal balloon distensions on 2 different days separated by 24.3 (SD 24.6) days. Rectal balloon distensions were also performed in 18 humans (mean age: 34 yr; range: 21-56 yr; 12 men) on two separate occasions, separated by 9.3 (SD 5.5) days. In rats, cerebral evoked potentials (CEPs) were recorded by use of implanted skull-electrodes to distension pressure of 80 mmHg. In humans surface electrodes and individualized pressure, corresponding to pain detection threshold, were used. Comparison of morphology was assessed by wavelet analysis. Within- and between-day reproducibility was assessed in terms of latencies, amplitudes, and frequency content. In rats CEPs showed triphasic morphology. No differences in latencies, amplitudes, and power distribution were seen within or between days (all P ≥ 0.5). Peak-to-peak amplitude between the first positive and negative potential were the most reproducible characteristic within and between days (evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC) (ICC = 0.99 and ICC = 9.98, respectively). In humans CEPs showed a triphasic morphology. No differences in latencies, amplitudes, or power distribution were seen within or between days (all P ≥ 0.2). Latency to the second negative potential (ICC = 0.98) and the second positive potential (ICC = 0.95) was the most reproducible characteristic within and between days. A unique and reliable translational platform was established assessing visceral sensitivity in rats and humans, which may improve the translational process of developing new drugs targeting visceral pain.