Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Orthop ; 46(12): 2897-2906, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36153365

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) with the administration of multisegment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) combined with Ponte osteotomy long-level fixation fusion, as well as to identify the factors affecting health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre study involving comprehensive clinical data. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) outcomes, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) questionnaire were recorded to assess HRQOL. A correlation analysis was performed to determine the association between HRQOL and radiographic parameters. RESULTS: A total of 41 consecutive patients (15 males and 26 females) met the inclusion criteria with a follow-up of 8.62 ± 1.20 years. Factors associated with HRQOL were significantly improved post-operation. Global sagittal parameters, including the sagittal vertebral axis (SVA) and T1 pelvic angle (TPA), and local parameters, including apical vertebral translation (AVT) and apical vertebral rotation (AVR), were significantly improved at the last follow-up. Significantly strong correlations between each clinical and radiographic parameter were demonstrated. Moreover, a multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that the differences in AVT and AVR were significantly correlated with the difference in lumbar lordosis (LL), which was significantly correlated with the differences in SVA and TPA. CONCLUSION: The surgical treatment of DLS with multisegment TLIF accompanied by Ponte osteotomy and long-level fixations improved the quality of life of patients with a long-term effect. AVR correction is an important factor for LL restoration that significantly correlates with improvements in the sagittal balance parameters SVA and TPA, which are key factors for guaranteeing good HRQOL.


Asunto(s)
Escoliosis , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Escoliosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Escoliosis/cirugía , Escoliosis/etiología , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Puente
2.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 191: 105645, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32028128

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of single-stage posterior total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of lumbar spinal metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2012 to January 2015, 20 consecutive cases with lumbar spinal metastases who received single-stage posterior TES were retrospectively analyzed. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate patients' pain status, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification was used to evaluate neurological status, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score system was used to evaluate patients' performance status at pre- and post-operation and final follow-up. In addition, Intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative complications, local kyphosis angle, and the postoperative duration of hospital stay were analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 16 months (ranging from 3 to 39 months), and 4 patients were still alive at the last follow-up. The mean amount of intraoperative blood loss and operation time was 970 mL and 232.5 min, respectively. The average VAS score improved from 7.5 preoperative to 2.8 postoperative and 3.2 at the last follow-up. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 cases. Sixteen patients died within 2 years after surgery, 10 of which died within 1 year. In the remaining 4 patients, the mean follow-up period was 37.25 months. One case of local recurrence occurred but no implant failure presented during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage posterior TES is a challenging but rewarding procedure in the treatment of lumbar spinal metastases. Due to unique anatomy and biomechanics, surgeons should be aware of important vessels, and nerve root injury should be avoided.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/fisiopatología , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Metastasectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Tiempo de Internación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Dimensión del Dolor , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Músculos Psoas , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/fisiopatología , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Raíces Nerviosas Espinales , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA