Interference of M-protein on Thrombin Time Test: A Case Report.

OBJECTIVE: A case of interference of monoclonal protein (M-protein) on thrombin time (TT) test in a 39-year-old Caucasian male patient is presented. METHODS: Coagulation screening tests were performed where altered results only for TT result (>150 seconds) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) result (36 seconds) were measured. Further specific coagulation testing included measurement of individual coagulation factors FII, FV, FVII, FVIII, FIX, FX, FXI, and FXII. Diagnostic steps in detection and identification of monoclonal protein included serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation (both serum and urine specimen). RESULTS: Monoclonal protein immunoglobulin G kappa detection and identification in serum and urine clarified the situation. CONCLUSION: Unexpectedly altered results of screening coagulation tests without any appropriate clinical signs and symptoms in a patient without any anticoagulant therapy needs to be critically considered in the context of extended next diagnostic steps in order to clarify the cause of pathological test results.

α-1 Antitrypsin Genotype-Phenotype Discrepancy in a 42-Year-Old Man Who Carries the Null-Allele.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-1-antitrypsin (A1AT) deficiency is a hereditary condition caused by mutations in the SERPINA1 gene and associated with lung emphysema and liver disease. Laboratory testing in suspected A1AT deficiency involves quantifying serum A1AT concentration and identification of specific alleles by genotyping and phenotyping. The aim of this report was to present a case of the null allele carrier with consequent genotype/phenotype/concentration discrepancies and potential misclassification of the Z variant in a 42-year-old white man presenting with symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHOD: Serum A1AT concentration was measured using an immunoturbidimetric assay. A1AT phenotype was determined using isoelectric focusing followed with immunofixation (IEF-IF). Genotyping specifically for the S and Z allele was performed by melting curve analysis using real-time PCR and checked by an alternative PCR-RFLP method. Genotype/phenotype ambiguity and discrepancy were amended using gene sequencing. RESULTS: Laboratory testing revealed highly reduced A1AT concentration (less than 0.30 g/L), mild to moderate deficient genotype (Pi*Z allele: M/Z and Pi*S allele: M/M) and severe deficient Z homozygous phenotype (Pi ZZ). After repeated sampling, the same discordant results were verified by these tests. Further sequencing revealed two clinically relevant and defective variants: rs199422210 (a rare null allele) and rs28929474 (the Z allele). CONCLUSION: Due to inability of genotyping kit probes to detect null/Z allele combination (which mimics the Pi ZZ phenotype), our patient was misclassified as mild to moderate deficient Pi*MZ heterozygote. In all unclear cases, whole-gene sequencing is highly recommended in order to determine definitive cause of A1AT deficiency.

Faecal calprotectin determination: impact of preanalytical sample treatment and stool consistency on within- and between-method variability.

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the differences in faecal calprotectin (FC) concentrations measured by two assays depending on the stool consistency and extraction method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stool samples were extracted using the EliA Stool Extraction Kit, Calex® Cap extraction device and respective weighing methods, while FC concentrations were measured using the EliATM Calprotectin and Bühlmann fCAL® Turbo method and checked for within- and between-method variability with regard to extraction method and stool consistency category. Extraction yield was evaluated for impact of different sample incubation time (10 min and 1 h) in extraction buffer for both methods and for impact of different initial sample dilutions (1:50, 1:100, 1:500) for fCAL® Turbo method. RESULTS: Results determined from Calex® Cap extracts were higher compared to weighing method extracts (mean bias 33.3%; P < 0.001), while no significant difference was found between results obtained with EliA Stool Extraction Kit and weighing method (mean bias 0.1%; P = 0.484), in both cases irrespective of stool consistency. Bühlmann fCAL® Turbo results were higher than EliATM Calprotectin results (mean bias 32.3%, P = 0.025 weighing method; and mean bias 53.9%, P < 0.001 extraction devices), the difference is dependent on stool consistency and FC concentration. Significantly higher FC extraction yield was obtained with longer sample incubation time for both methods (P = 0.019 EliATM Calprotectin; P < 0.001 fCAL® Turbo) and with increasing initial sample dilution for fCAL® Turbo method (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preanalytical stool sample handling proved to be a crucial factor contributing to within- and between-FC assay variability. Standardization is urgently needed in order to assure comparable and reliable FC results.