Concurrent Pregnancies and Parental Leaves Among Trainees in a Residency Program.

This Viewpoint shares the experience of a single Otolaryngology−Head & Neck Surgery residency program that faced the scheduling challenges of having nearly a quarter of its residents expecting a child and on parental leave.

Trends in Timing and Provision of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Care During COVID-19.

Objectives: To identify trends in timing of pediatric cochlear implant (CI) care during COVID-19. Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: Tertiary care center. Methods: Patients under 18 years of age who underwent CI between 1/1/2016 and 2/29/2020 were included in the pre-COVID-19 group, and patients implanted between 3/1/2020 and 12/31/2021 comprised the COVID-19 group. Revision and sequential surgeries were excluded. Time intervals between care milestones including severe-to-profound hearing loss diagnosis, initial CI candidacy evaluation, and surgery were compared among groups, as were the number and type of postoperative visits. Results: A total of 98 patients met criteria; 70 were implanted pre-COVID-19 and 28 during COVID-19. A significant increase in the interval between CI candidacy evaluation and surgery was seen among patients with prelingual deafness during COVID-19 compared with pre-COVID-19 (µ = 47.3 weeks, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 34.8-59.9 vs µ = 20.5 weeks, 95% CI: 13.1-27.9; p < .001). Patients in the COVID-19 group attended fewer in-person rehabilitation visits in the 12 months after surgery (µ = 14.9 visits, 95% CI: 9.7-20.1 vs µ = 20.9, 95% CI: 18.1-23.7; p = .04). Average age at implantation in the COVID-19 group was 5.7 years (95% CI: 4.0-7.5) versus 3.7 years in the pre-COVID-19 group (95% CI: 2.9-4.6; p = .05). The time interval between hearing loss confirmation and CI surgery was on average 99.7 weeks for patients implanted during COVID-19 (95% CI: 48.8-150) versus 54.2 weeks for patients implanted pre-COVID (95% CI: 39.6-68.8), which was not a statistically significant difference (p = .1). Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic patients with prelingual deafness experienced delays in care relative to patients implanted before the pandemic.

Hearing Loss and Tinnitus.

A focused history, otoscopic and tuning fork examination and formal hearing testing are the diagnostic pillars for the workup of hearing loss and tinnitus. The causes of hearing loss and tinnitus are varied and range from relatively common age-related hearing loss to rare tumors of the brain and skull base. In this chapter, the authors explain the diagnostic workup of hearing loss and tinnitus, review the pathophysiology of the most common causes, and describe the treatments available.

Vertigo: Streamlining the Evaluation through Symptom Localization.

Vertigo is defined as the illusion of internal or external motion. The evaluation of a patient with vertigo in the primary care setting should not necessarily focus on providing a specific diagnosis. Rather, the physician should aim to localize the lesion. This practice streamlines the workup of patients. This article provides detailed information regarding appropriate organ system-based clinical history and the clinical workup of vertigo. Additional signs and symptoms that can facilitate appropriate referral and treatment are highlighted. Although disorder-specific treatments exist the mainstay of therapy for vertigo-induced pathology is physical therapy.

Optimized Diagnostic Approach to Patients Suspected of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence.

OBJECTIVES: Current methods of diagnosing superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) include a clinical exam, audiometric testing, temporal bone computer tomography (CT) imaging, and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing. The main objective of this study was to develop an improved diagnostic approach to SCDS optimized for accuracy, efficiency, and safety that utilizes clinical presentation, audiometric testing, CT imaging, high-frequency cervical VEMP (cVEMP) testing, and patient treatment preference. A secondary aim was to investigate the cost associated with the current versus proposed diagnostic paradigms. DESIGN: All patients who underwent cVEMP testing since introduction of the 2 kHz cVEMP in our clinical protocol in July 2018 were screened. Patients suspected of SCDS based upon symptoms who also had available audiogram, CT scan, and 2 kHz cVEMP were included (58 ears). Patients were categorized as dehiscent, thin, or not dehiscent based on their CT scan. Symptom prevalence and cVEMP outcomes were analyzed and compared for all groups. The accuracy of the 2 kHz cVEMP was calculated using CT imaging as the standard. Using a combination of patient symptomatology, audiometric, CT and 2 kHz cVEMP data, as well as patient preference, a best clinical practice approach was developed. The cost associated with this approach was calculated and compared with cost of the current SCDS diagnostic workup using Medicare reimbursement rates. RESULTS: In the overall patient population suspected of SCDS based on clinical presentation, the sensitivity and specificity of 2 kHz cVEMP were 76% and 100%, respectively, while the positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 84.6%, assuming that the CT scan finding was correct. Autophony was the most common symptom in patients who had both superior semicircular canal dehiscence on CT imaging plus abnormal 2 kHz cVEMP (p < 0.001). Combining patient symptomatology, 2 kHz normalized peak to peak cVEMP amplitude, and patient treatment preference to determine, which patients should undergo CT scanning resulted in a potential cost reduction between 45% and 61%. CONCLUSION: In patients suspected of SCDS based on their clinical presentation, the combination of symptomatology, 2 kHz cVEMP data, and patient preference can be used to determine which patients should undergo CT scanning, resulting in a diagnostic cost reduction and reduced patient radiation exposure.

Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) Testing for Diagnosis of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence.

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence is a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal, which can lead to a variety of auditory and vestibular symptoms. The diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) can be challenging, time consuming, and costly. The clinical presentation of SCD patients resembles that of other otologic disease, necessitating objective diagnostics. Although temporal bone CT imaging provides excellent sensitivity for SCD detection, it lacks specificity. Because the treatment of SCD is surgical, it is crucial to use a highly specific test to confirm the diagnosis and avoid false positives and subsequent unnecessary surgery. This review provides an update on recent improvements in vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing for SCD diagnosis. Combining audiometric and conventional cervical VEMP results improves SCD diagnostic accuracy. High frequency VEMP testing is superior to all other methods described to date. It is highly specific for the detection of SCD and may be used to guide decision-making regarding the need for subsequent CT imaging. This algorithmic sequential use of testing can substantially reduce radiation exposure as well as cost associated with SCD diagnosis.

Predicting Development of Bilateral Menière's Disease Based on cVEMP Threshold and Tuning.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) is predictive for developing bilateral Menière's disease (MD). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Records of 71 patients previously diagnosed with unilateral MD at our institution who underwent cVEMP testing between 2002 and 2011 were screened. INTERVENTION: Patients were contacted to answer a questionnaire to identify which patients had developed bilateral disease. Based on questionnaires and medical charts, 49 patients with a follow-up time of at least 5 years were included. The 49 originally asymptomatic ears are referred to as "study ears." Previously reported cVEMP criteria (original criteria) applied to study-ear cVEMPs separated them into Menière-like and normal-like groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main purpose was to determine if previously obtained cVEMP thresholds and tuning ratios of unilateral MD patients could predict who develops bilateral disease. RESULTS: From the 49 included patients, 12 developed bilateral disease (24.5%). The study ears characterized by original cVEMP criteria as Menière-like were significantly more likely to develop bilateral disease compared with the normal-like study ears. The original criteria predicted development of bilateral disease with a positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 58.3% and 86.5% respectively. ROC curves were used to revise cVEMP criteria for predicting the progression to bilateral disease. A revised criterion combining three cVEMP metrics, reached a PPV and NPV of 85.7% and 93.7%. CONCLUSION: cVEMP threshold and tuning in unilateral MD patients are predictive of which patients will develop bilateral disease.

Superior Canal Dehiscence Surgery Outcomes Following Failed Round Window Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Round window (RW) occlusion or reinforcement is a less-invasive option compared with direct repair approaches to improve symptoms of superior canal dehiscence (SCD) syndrome. However, RW surgery is associated with variable outcomes. Middle fossa craniotomy or transmastoid repair is an option for SCD patients who fail RW surgery, but it is unknown whether sequential repair following RW plugging improves SCD symptoms or increases complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate outcomes of SCD repair via middle fossa craniotomy following failed RW surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Adult patients with SCD syndrome who underwent failed RW surgery followed by sequential middle fossa craniotomy and plugging of the arcuate eminence defect. Patients with SCD associated with the superior petrosal sinus were excluded. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prospectively collected pre- and postoperative symptom questionnaires, threshold audiograms, and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP). RESULTS: Seven SCD patients (out of a total of 194 surgical cases at our institution) underwent sequential middle-fossa SCD repair following failed RW surgery. Resolution of symptoms and reversal of diagnostic indicators were observed in the majority of subjects following sequential repair. Two of seven patients underwent a third procedure with plugging of the superior semicircular canal by a transmastoid approach due to the presence of residual symptoms. CONCLUSION: Middle fossa craniotomy and SCD occlusion is a safe and reasonable option for patients who fail RW surgery. Our cohort did not show increased risks of auditory or vestibular dysfunction.

Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Menière's Disease: A Comparison of Response Metrics.

OBJECTIVE: The cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) has been used to evaluate patients with Menière's disease (MD). Studied cVEMP metrics include: amplitude, threshold, frequency tuning, and interaural asymmetry ratio (IAR). However, few studies compared these metrics in the same set of MD patients, and methodological differences prevent such a comparison across studies. This study investigates the value of different cVEMP metrics in distinguishing one set of MD patients from age-matched controls. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Thirty patients with definite unilateral MD and 23 age-matched controls were prospectively included. All underwent cVEMP testing at 500, 750, 1000, and 2000 Hz on each side. Ears were separated into three groups: affected MD, unaffected MD, and control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sound level functions were obtained at each frequency, and normalized peak-to-peak amplitude (VEMPn), VEMP inhibition depth (VEMPid), threshold, frequency-tuning ratio, and IAR were calculated. For all metrics, the differentiation between MD and control ears was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: 500 Hz cVEMP threshold, VEMPn, and VEMPid were similarly good at distinguishing affected MD ears from healthy ears, with ROC area under the curves (AUCs) of more than 0.828 and optimal sensitivities and specificities of at least 80 and 70%. Combinations of these three metrics yielded slightly larger AUCs (>0.880). Tuning ratios and IAR were less effective in separating healthy from affected ears with AUCs ranging from 0.529 to 0.720. CONCLUSION: The cVEMP metrics most useful in distinguishing MD patients from healthy controls are threshold, VEMPn, and VEMPid, using 500 Hz stimuli.

Audiometric and cVEMP Thresholds Show Little Correlation With Symptoms in Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the relationship between objective audiometric and vestibular tests and patient symptoms in superior canal dehiscence (SCD) syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Ninety-eight patients with SCD, preoperative threshold audiograms, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds, and computed tomography (CT) imaging were included. Clinical reports were reviewed for self-reported SCD symptoms. Twenty-five patients completed the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Autophony Index (AI), and the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlations between preoperative low-frequency air-bone gap (ABG), cVEMP thresholds, and symptoms (including HHI, DHI, AI, and SF-36). Symptoms included hearing loss, aural fullness, autophony, hyperacusis, tinnitus, vertigo, imbalance and sound-, pressure and exercise provoked dizziness. Secondary outcome measure: Correlations between changes of objective and subjective measures before and after surgery. RESULTS: Patients who reported hearing loss had larger ABGs at 250 Hz than patients without subjective hearing loss (p = 0.001). ABGs and cVEMP thresholds did not correlate with any other symptom. No significant correlation was found between ABG or cVEMP threshold and the HHI, DHI, AI or Health Utility Value (derived from the SF-36 quality of life score). Following SCD surgery, ABG decreased (p < 0.001), cVEMP thresholds increased (p < 0.001) and overall symptoms, handicap scores and quality-of-life improved; however, there was no significant relationship between these measures. CONCLUSION: While threshold audiometry and cVEMP are important tools to diagnose SCD and monitor surgical outcomes, these measures showed no significant correlation with vestibular and most auditory symptoms or their severity.

Toward Optimizing VEMP: Calculating VEMP Inhibition Depth With a Generic Template.

OBJECTIVES: Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) indirectly reveal the response of the saccule to acoustic stimuli through the inhibition of sternocleidomastoid muscle electromyographic response. VEMP inhibition depth (VEMPid) is a recently developed metric that estimates the percentage of saccular inhibition. VEMPid provides both normalization and better accuracy at low response levels than amplitude-normalized cVEMPs. Hopefully, VEMPid will aid in the clinical assessment of patients with vestibulopatholgy. To calculate VEMPid a template is needed. In the original method, a subject's own cVEMP was used as the template, but this method can be problematic in patients who do not have robust cVEMP responses. We hypothesize that a "generic" template, created by assembling cVEMPs from healthy subjects, can be used to compute VEMPid, which would facilitate the use of VEMPid in subjects with pathological conditions. DESIGN: A generic template was created by averaging cVEMP responses from 6 normal subjects. To compare VEMPid calculations using a generic versus a subject-specific template, cVEMPs were obtained in 40 healthy subjects using 500, 750, and 1000 Hz tonebursts at sound levels ranging from 98 to 123 dB peSPL. VEMPids were calculated both with the generic template and with the subject's own template. The ability of both templates to determine whether a cVEMP was present or not was compared with receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between VEMPid calculations using a generic template versus using a subject-specific template for all frequencies and sound levels. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curves, the subject-specific and generic template did an equally good job at determining threshold. Within limits, the shape of the generic template did not affect these results. CONCLUSIONS: A generic template can be used instead of a subject-specific template to calculate VEMPid. Compared with cVEMP normalized by electromyographic amplitudes, VEMPid is advantageous because it averages zero when there is no sound stimulus and it allows the accumulating VEMPid value to be shown during data acquisition as a guide to deciding when enough data has been collected.

Toward Optimizing cVEMP: 2,000-Hz Tone Bursts Improve the Detection of Superior Canal Dehiscence.

BACKGROUND: The cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) test measures saccular and inferior vestibular nerve function. The cVEMP can be elicited with different frequency stimuli and interpreted using a variety of metrics. Patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) syndrome generally have lower cVEMP thresholds and larger amplitudes, although there is overlap with healthy subjects. The aim of this study was to evaluate which metric and frequency best differentiate healthy ears from SCD ears using cVEMP. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with SCD and 23 age-matched controls were prospectively included and underwent cVEMP testing at 500, 750, 1,000 and 2,000 Hz. Sound level functions were obtained at all frequencies to acquire threshold and to calculate normalized peak-to-peak amplitude (VEMPn) and VEMP inhibition depth (VEMPid). Third window indicator (TWI) metrics were calculated by subtracting the 250-Hz air-bone gap from the ipsilateral cVEMP threshold at each frequency. Ears of SCD patients were divided into three groups based on CT imaging: dehiscent, thin or unaffected. The ears of healthy age-matched control subjects constituted a fourth group. RESULTS: Comparing metrics at all frequencies revealed that 2,000-Hz stimuli were most effective in differentiating SCD from normal ears. ROC analysis indicated that for both 2,000-Hz cVEMP threshold and for 2,000-Hz TWI, 100% specificity could be achieved with a sensitivity of 92.0%. With 2,000-Hz VEMPn and VEMPid at the highest sound level, 100% specificity could be achieved with a sensitivity of 96.0%. CONCLUSION: The best diagnostic accuracy of cVEMP in SCD patients can be achieved with 2,000-Hz tone burst stimuli, regardless of which metric is used.

Toward Optimizing Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (cVEMP): Combining Air-Bone Gap and cVEMP Thresholds to Improve Diagnosis of Superior Canal Dehiscence.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a novel approach combining low-frequency air-bone gap (ABG) and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds to improve screening for superior canal dehiscence (SCD) syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: One hundred forty patients with SCD and 21 healthy age-matched controls were included. Ears for each patient were divided into three groups based on computed tomography (CT) findings: 1) dehiscent, 2) thin, or 3) unaffected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: cVEMP and audiometric thresholds were analyzed and differences among groups were evaluated. RESULTS: We define the third window indicator (TWI) as the cVEMP thresholds at 500, 750, and 1000 Hz adjusted for the ABG at 250 Hz (i.e., subtracting ABG from cVEMP threshold). The TWI differentiates between dehiscent and nondehiscent control ears with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 100%, corresponding to a positive predictive value of 100%. ABGs and cVEMP thresholds were similar for healthy controls and patients with thin bone over the superior canal. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to date examining the usefulness of cVEMPs in the diagnosis of SCD. Our "third window indicator" (TWI) combines cVEMP thresholds with the ABG at 250 Hz to improve the ability to screen patients with SCD symptoms.

Toward Optimizing Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials: Normalization Reduces the Need for Strong Neck Muscle Contraction.

BACKGROUND: The cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) represents an inhibitory reflex of the saccule measured in the ipsilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) in response to acoustic or vibrational stimulation. Since the cVEMP is a modulation of SCM electromyographic (EMG) activity, cVEMP amplitude is proportional to muscle EMG amplitude. We sought to evaluate muscle contraction influences on cVEMP peak-to-peak amplitudes (VEMPpp), normalized cVEMP amplitudes (VEMPn), and inhibition depth (VEMPid). METHODS: cVEMPs at 500 Hz were measured in 25 healthy subjects for 3 SCM EMG contraction ranges: 45-65, 65-105, and 105-500 µV root mean square (r.m.s.). For each range, we measured cVEMP sound level functions (93-123 dB peSPL) and sound off, meaning that muscle contraction was measured without acoustic stimulation. The effect of muscle contraction amplitude on VEMPpp, VEMPn, and VEMPid and the ability to distinguish cVEMP presence/absence were evaluated. RESULTS: VEMPpp amplitudes were significantly greater at higher muscle contractions. In contrast, VEMPn and VEMPid showed no significant effect of muscle contraction. Cohen's d indicated that for all 3 cVEMP metrics contraction amplitude variations produced little change in the ability to distinguish cVEMP presence/absence. VEMPid more clearly indicated saccular output because when no acoustic stimulus was presented the saccular inhibition estimated by VEMPid was zero, unlike those by VEMPpp and VEMPn. CONCLUSION: Muscle contraction amplitude strongly affects VEMPpp amplitude, but contractions 45-300 µV r.m.s. produce stable VEMPn and VEMPid values. Clinically, there may be no need for subjects to exert high contraction effort. This is especially beneficial in patients for whom maintaining high SCM contraction amplitudes is challenging.

Systematic Review of Nontumor Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Implant Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) was initially developed for patients with deafness as a result of neurofibromatosis type 2. ABI indications have recently extended to children with congenital deafness who are not cochlear implant candidates. Few multi-institutional outcome data exist. Herein, we aim to provide a systematic review of outcomes following implantation of the ABI in pediatric patients with nontumor diagnosis, with a focus on audiometric outcomes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review of literature was performed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) recommendations. Variables assessed included age at implantation, diagnosis, medical history, cochlear implant history, radiographic findings, ABI device implanted, surgical approach, complications, side effects, and auditory outcomes. RESULTS: The initial search identified 304 articles; 21 met inclusion criteria for a total of 162 children. The majority of these patients had cochlear nerve aplasia (63.6%, 103 of 162). Cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred in up to 8.5% of cases. Audiometric outcomes improved over time. After 5 years, almost 50% of patients reached Categories of Auditory Performance scores >4; however, patients with nonauditory disabilities did not demonstrate a similar increase in scores. CONCLUSION: ABI surgery is a reasonable option for the habilitation of deaf children who are not cochlear implant candidates. Although improvement in Categories of Auditory Performance scores was seen across studies, pediatric ABI users with nonauditory disabilities have inferior audiometric outcomes.