RESUMEN
Objective: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasingly incident in England, while survival remains poor with regional disparities. We aimed to explore the differences in HCC treatment across different geographical regions and to examine the impact on cancer survival. Methods: Incident HCC cases and treatment were identified from the English Hospital Episode Statistics (2016-2017) and then a subset by National Health Service (NHS) regions. Treatment was grouped into curative, palliative and untreated. Median survival was estimated to date of death in the national statistics. Results: The median observed survival was 8.6 months (95% CI 7.5 to 9.9) across all 2160 HCC cases, 52.1 months (CI 50.5, not reached) in 449 (20.8%) treated with curative intent, 21.0 months (CI 18.5 to 24.5) after other cancer-specific treatment in 449 (20.8%), and 2.3 months (CI 2.1 to 2.6) in 1262 (58.4%) untreated. Across NHS regions, <50% of cases received treatment (30.4%-49.6%), while between 14.2% and 27.7% had curative treatment. The 3-year survival was similar (23.5%-29.7%), except in the London region (40.0%). Conclusion: Majority of HCC cases in England are untreated and survival remains low, with variation in outcomes in regions with similar incident rates. A deeper exploration of regional treatments and screening practice is required to improve early detection and survival.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: There is growing interest in condition-specific preference measures, including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Utility Measure-Core 10 Dimensions (QLU-C10D). This research assessed the implications of using utility indices on the basis of the EQ-5D-3L, a mapping of EQ-5D-3L to the EQ-5D-5L, and the QLU-C10D, and compared their psychometric properties. METHODS: Data were taken from 8 phase 3 randomized controlled trials of nivolumab with or without ipilimumab for the treatment of solid tumors. Utilities for progression-related states were calculated using the UK and English value sets and incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) derived from established UK cost-effectiveness models. The psychometric properties of the utility indices were assessed using pooled trial data. RESULTS: Compared with the EQ-5D-3L index, the mapped EQ-5D-5L index yielded an average of 6% more and the QLU-C10D index an average of 2% fewer incremental QALYs for nivolumab versus comparators. All indices could differentiate between groups defined by performance status, cancer stage, or self-reported health status at baseline and detect meaningful changes in performance status, tumor response, health status, and quality of life over approximately 12 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The lower QALY yield of the QLU-C10D was balanced by evidence of greater validity and responsiveness. Benefits gained from using the QLU-C10D may be apparent when treatments affect targeted symptoms and functional aspects, including sleep, bowel function, appetite, nausea, and fatigue. The observed differences in QALYs may not be sufficiently large to affect health technology assessment decisions.