Salvage Radiation for Pelvic Relapse after Surgically Treated Endometrial Cancer.

(1) Background: This study evaluated the clinical outcome after salvage radiotherapy for first pelvic relapse after endometrial cancer (EC). (2) Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included EC patients with first central pelvic relapse without lymph node involvement treated with curative intent. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and possible predictive factors for risk of relapse and mortality were identified using the Cox model. (3) Results: We included 139 patients with median EQD2 (Equivalent Dose in 2 Gy fractions) to the clinical target volume of 70.0 Gy. During follow up of median 6.66 years, 39.6% patients developed a second relapse. Risk group classification at primary diagnosis based on histology, grading and FIGO stage and how the pelvic tumor boost was administered were independently associated with PFS and OS. Five-year OS was 68% (95% CI (59-75)) for the whole cohort. Five-year OS was 88% (95% CI (75-94)), 72% (95% CI (55-84)) and 38% (95% CI (15-60)) for the stage I low-, intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The majority of central pelvic recurrences in RT-naive EC women can be successfully salvaged with radiotherapy. However, survival in patients with high-risk disease remains poor and warrants a more individualized approach to optimize outcome.

Normal tissue complication probability models in plan evaluation of children with brain tumors referred to proton therapy.

Background: Children with brain tumors undergoing radiotherapy are at particular risk of radiation-induced morbidity and are therefore routinely considered for proton therapy (PT) to reduce the dose to healthy tissues. The aim of this study was to apply pediatric constraints and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models when evaluating the differences between PT and contemporary photon-based radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods: Forty patients (aged 1-17 years) referred from Norwegian institutions to cranial PT abroad during 2014-2016 were selected for VMAT re-planning using the original CT sets and target volumes. The VMAT and delivered PT plans were compared by dose/volume metrics and NTCP models related to growth hormone deficiency, auditory toxicity, visual impairment, xerostomia, neurocognitive outcome and secondary brain and parotid gland cancers. Results: The supratentorial brain, temporal lobes, hippocampi, hypothalamus, pituitary glands, cochleas, salivary glands, optic nerves and chiasm received lower mean doses from PT. Reductions in population median NTCP were significant for auditory toxicity (VMAT: 3.8%; PT: 0.3%), neurocognitive outcome (VMAT: 3.0 IQ points decline at 5 years post RT; PT: 2.5 IQ points), xerostomia (VMAT: 2.0%; PT: 0.6%), excess absolute risk of secondary cancer of the brain (VMAT: 9.2%; PT: 6.7%) and salivary glands (VMAT: 2.8%; PT:0.5%). Across all patients, 23/38 PT plans had better or comparable estimated risks for all endpoints (within ±10% of the risk relative to VMAT), whereas for 1/38 patients all estimates were better or comparable with VMAT. Conclusions: PT reduced the volumes of normal tissues exposed to radiation, particularly low-to-intermediate dose levels, and this was reflected in lower NTCP. Of the included endpoints, substantial reductions in population medians were seen from the delivered PT plans for auditory complications, xerostomia, and risk of secondary cancers of the brain and salivary glands.

Children treated for medulloblastoma and supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor in Norway from 1974 through 2013: Unexplainable regional differences in survival.

BACKGROUND: A previous study based on Norwegian Cancer Registry data suggested regional differences in overall survival (OS) after treatment for medulloblastoma (MB) and supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor (CNS-PNET) in Norway. The purpose of the present study was to confirm in an extended cohort whether there were regional differences in outcome or not, and if so try to identify possible explanations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from patients aged 0-20 years diagnosed with and treated for MB/CNS-PNET at all four university hospitals in Norway from 1974 to 2013 were collected and compared. RESULTS: Of 266 identified patients, 251 fulfilled inclusion criteria. MB was diagnosed in 200 and CNS-PNET in 51 patients. Five-year OS and event-free survival (EFS) were 59% and 52%, respectively. There was a significant difference in five-year OS and EFS between MB and CNS-PNET patients; 62% versus 47% (P =  0.007) and 57% versus 35% (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, two factors were found to significantly contribute to improved five-year OS and EFS, whereas one factor contributed to improved five-year OS only. Gross total resection (GTR) versus non-GTR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, P =  0.003; HR 0.46, P < 0.001) and cerebrospinal irradiation (CSI) versus non-CSI (HR 0.24, P < 0.001; HR 0.28, P < 0.001) for both, and treatment outside Oslo University Hospital for OS only (HR 0.64, P =  0.048). CONCLUSION: Survival was comparable with data from other population-based studies, and the importance of GTR and CSI was confirmed. The cause for regional survival differences could not be identified.

[How do Norwegian oncologists perceive their working conditions?]. / Hva mener norske onkologer om sin arbeidssituasjon?

BACKGROUND: After receiving worrying signals from its members concerning their workload, the Norwegian Oncology Society decided to review how Norwegian oncologists perceive their working conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all doctors working in departments of oncology. They were asked to provide background information about themselves, how they experienced the working conditions, and what could be done to improve work satisfaction. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis of results. RESULTS: 174 of 298 doctors (58 %) answered the questionnaire. The median number of working hours per week was 52 hours for oncologists, and 45 hours for doctors in training. 72 % of oncologists and 56 % of doctors in training stated the workload is so high that it is difficult to complete all tasks. 63 % of oncologists felt that work was so energy-consuming that it affected their private life, 77 % of them were quite dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with time allocated to do research. 54 % of specialists and 72 % of doctors in training were very happy or happy with their job in general. 86 % of specialists and 61 % of doctors in training reported that more positions for oncologists and doctors in training, respectively, would increase their job satisfaction. INTERPRETATION: Doctors working in the field of oncology in Norway regard the workload to be too high. Oncologists believe that job satisfaction would improve if more time was allocated to research and if there were more positions for doctors at all levels.