Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(1)2021 Dec 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35008799

RESUMEN

Implementation of high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) screening and the increasing proportion of HPV vaccinated women in the screening program will reduce the percentage of HPV positive women with oncogenic potential. In search of more specific markers to identify women with high risk of cancer development, we used RNA sequencing to compare the transcriptomic immune-profile of 13 lesions with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and 14 normal biopsies from women with detected HPV infections. In CIN3/AIS lesions as compared to normal tissue, 27 differential expressed genes were identified. Transcriptomic analysis revealed significantly higher expression of a number of genes related to proliferation, (CDKN2A, MELK, CDK1, MKI67, CCNB2, BUB1, FOXM1, CDKN3), but significantly lower expression of genes related to a favorable immune response (NCAM1, ARG1, CD160, IL18, CX3CL1). Compared to the RNA sequencing results, good correlation was achieved with relative quantitative PCR analysis for NCAM1 and CDKN2A. Quantification of NCAM1 positive cells with immunohistochemistry showed epithelial reduction of NCAM1 in CIN3/AIS lesions. In conclusion, NCAM1 and CDKN2A are two promising candidates to distinguish whether women are at high risk of developing cervical cancer and in need of frequent follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Transducción de Señal , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/inmunología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/inmunología , Adulto , Biopsia , Proliferación Celular , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Ontología de Genes , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/patología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Transducción de Señal/genética , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/genética , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/genética , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/patología , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/virología
2.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol ; 18(1): 90-6, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19661787

RESUMEN

Immunohistochemical staining is important for diagnosis and therapeutic decision making but the results may vary when different detection systems are used. To analyze this, 5 different labeled polymer immunohistochemical detection systems, REAL EnVision, EnVision Flex, EnVision Flex+ (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), NovoLink (Novocastra Laboratories Ltd, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK) and UltraVision ONE (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Fremont, CA) were tested using 12 different, widely used mouse and rabbit primary antibodies, detecting nuclear, cytoplasmic, and membrane antigens. Serial sections of multitissue blocks containing 4% formaldehyde fixed paraffin embedded material were selected for their weak, moderate, and strong staining for each antibody. Specificity and sensitivity were evaluated by subjective scoring and digital image analysis. At optimal primary antibody dilution, digital image analysis showed that EnVision Flex+ was the most sensitive system (P < 0.005), with means of 8.3, 13.4, 20.2, and 41.8 gray scale values stronger staining than REAL EnVision, EnVision Flex, NovoLink, and UltraVision ONE, respectively. NovoLink was the second most sensitive system for mouse antibodies, but showed low sensitivity for rabbit antibodies. Due to low sensitivity, 2 cases with UltraVision ONE and 1 case with NovoLink stained false negatively. None of the detection systems showed any distinct false positivity, but UltraVision ONE and NovoLink consistently showed weak background staining both in negative controls and at optimal primary antibody dilution. We conclude that there are significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, costs, and total assay time in the immunohistochemical detection systems currently in use.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos , Inmunohistoquímica/métodos , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico/normas , Animales , Antígenos/análisis , Membrana Celular/inmunología , Núcleo Celular/inmunología , Citoplasma/inmunología , Errores Diagnósticos , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica/normas , Ratones , Polímeros , Conejos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...