Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
G Ital Nefrol ; 40(5)2023 Oct 26.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38010244

RESUMEN

Intravenous iodinated contrast media are commonly used in clinical practice, ranging from medical imaging to interventional radiology (IR) procedures and endovascular interventions. Compared with patients with normal renal function, nephropathic patients have an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Nevertheless, this condition cannot represent a limit to diagnostics or endovascular interventions. Despite the literature of the last five years, conflicting management and approaches for nephropathic patients persist, including the use of contrast agents and treatments replacing renal functions, which are often mistakenly considered as part of preventive strategies. Though the issue has been widely discussed, specialists often cope with uncertainty in handling properly the administration of contrast media and renal counselling requests. Furthermore, there is a general difficulty in distinguishing the Post-Contrast Acute Kidney Injury (PC-AKI) from the Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury (CI-AKI). The present review aims to provide an update on the issue and examine strategies to reduce the acute kidney injury risk after the administration of contrast media. These strategies include the early identification of high-risk individuals, the choice of the contrast media and the proper dosage, the suspension of nephrotoxic drugs, the follow-up of the high-risk individuals, and the early identification of AKI.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Medios de Contraste , Humanos , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Riñón , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/prevención & control , Medición de Riesgo
2.
Intern Emerg Med ; 5(5): 427-32, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20449691

RESUMEN

This study was designed to assess the application of diagnostic guidelines to the management of chest pain by an observational study carried out in a small town (Ragusa) of southeast Sicily. This study was an attempt to compare a Sicilian experience with the literature. In this observational study, we examined all the patients referred for chest pain to the Emergency Department (ED) of "Civile-M. P. Arezzo" Hospital during a period of 6 months (from January 1st 2008 to June 30th 2008). As much as 857 patients were studied. The results of our study show that musculoskeletal chest pain is the most common final diagnosis (49%), followed by cardiac chest pain (26.3%), gastrointestinal chest pain (13%), pulmonary chest pain (7%) and psychiatric chest pain (4%). The majority of patients (95%) never made contact with their primary care providers, and came straight to ED. These results emphasize the need for reworking a strategy to avoid the situation in which all cases of non-emergency chest pain, such as musculoskeletal ones, come to the hospital for evaluation, thereby overwhelming the ED, particularly in rural areas where the management of any emergency is centralized in a single hospital.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en el Pecho/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/complicaciones , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/complicaciones , Prevalencia , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/complicaciones , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/epidemiología , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Sicilia/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA