Thymoquinone Antifungal Activity against Candida glabrata Oral Isolates from Patients in Intensive Care Units-An In Vitro Study.

The number of Candida spp. infections and drug resistance are dramatically increasing worldwide, particularly among immunosuppressed patients, and it is urgent to find novel compounds with antifungal activity. In this work, the antifungal and antibiofilm activity of thymoquinone (TQ), a key bioactive constituent of black cumin seed Nigella sativa L., was evaluated against Candida glabrata, a WHO 'high-priority' pathogen. Then, its effect on the expression of C. glabrata EPA6 and EPA7 genes (related to biofilm adhesion and development, respectively) were analyzed. Swab samples were taken from the oral cavity of 90 hospitalized patients in ICU wards, transferred to sterile falcon tubes, and cultured on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) and Chromagar Candida for presumptive identification. Next, a 21-plex PCR was carried out for the confirmation of species level. C. glabrata isolates underwent antifungal drug susceptibility testing against fluconazole (FLZ), itraconazole (ITZ), amphotericin B (AMB), and TQ according to the CLSI microdilution method (M27, A3/S4). Biofilm formation was measured by an MTT assay. EPA6 and EPA7 gene expression was assessed by real-time PCR. From the 90 swab samples, 40 isolates were identified as C. glabrata with the 21-plex PCR. Most isolates were resistant to FLZ (n = 29, 72.5%), whereas 12.5% and 5% were ITZ and AMB resistant, respectively. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC50) of TQ against C. glabrata was 50 µg/mL. Importantly, TQ significantly inhibited the biofilm formation of C. glabrata isolates, and EPA6 gene expression was reduced significantly at MIC50 concentration of TQ. TQ seems to have some antifungal, antibiofilm (adhesion) effect on C. glabrata isolates, showing that this plant secondary metabolite is a promising agent to overcome Candida infections, especially oral candidiasis.

CipA mediates complement resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii by formation of a factor I-dependent quadripartite assemblage.

Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii is known to be one of the leading pathogens that cause severe nosocomial infections. To overcome eradication by the innate immune system during infection, A. baumannii developed a number of immune evasion strategies. Previously, we identified CipA as a plasminogen-binding and complement-inhibitory protein. Here we show that CipA inhibits all three complement activation pathways and interacts with key complement components C3, C3b, C4b, C5, Factor B, Factor D, and in particular Factor I. CipA also targets function of the C5 convertase as cleavage of C5 was impaired. Systematic screening of CipA variants identified two separate binding sites for C3b and a Factor I-interacting domain located at the C-terminus. Structure predictions using AlphaFold2 and binding analyses employing CipA variants lacking Factor I-binding capability confirmed that the orientation of the C-terminal domain is essential for the interaction with Factor I. Hence, our analyses point to a novel Factor I-dependent mechanisms of complement inactivation mediated by CipA of A. baumannii. Recruitment of Factor I by CipA initiates the assembly of a quadripartite complex following binding of either Factor H or C4b-binding protein to degrade C3b and C4b, respectively. Loss of Factor I binding in a CipA-deficient strain, or a strain producing a CipA variant lacking Factor I-binding capability, correlated with a higher susceptibility to human serum, indicating that recruitment of Factor I enables A. baumannii to resist complement-mediated killing.

The safety and efficacy of cobimetinib for the treatment of BRAF V600E or V600K melanoma.

INTRODUCTION: In the recent years, melanoma patients' outcome and survival improved, mainly because of systemic treatment improvement with targeted therapy and checkpoint blockade. Targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was approved to treat patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma, harboring BRAF V600 mutations. This paper addresses the safety and efficacy of cobimetinib, when used in combination with vemurafenib, in the previous mentioned setting. AREAS COVERED: This article presents an overview on the rationale for clinical development of cobimetinib, as well as the mechanism of action, the efficacy and safety, and the most important trials that led to the approval of the combination therapy with vemurafenib. We searched the PubMed for published papers related to safety and efficacy of cobimetinib, and resistance mechanisms to BRAF inhibition. The abstract databases of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology were also searched for updates on the mentioned clinical trials. Expert commentary: Patients treated with targeted therapy experience a rapid tumor response. However, virtually all patients will develop resistance to treatment. Therapeutic combinations to overcome resistance mechanisms are currently addressed. In the future, targeted therapy strategy will include three or more drugs, probably from different therapeutic classes.

Intralesional immunotherapy as a strategy to treat melanoma.

INTRODUCTION: Intralesional immunotherapy supplements systemic treatments and often achieves higher remission rates as compared to systemic therapy. Its indication is metastatic melanoma with limited tumor burden, particularly in loco-regional metastasis and distant soft tissue metastasis. AREAS COVERED: This review describes intralesional immunotherapy with talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), with velimogene aliplasmid (Allovectin-7) and with intralesional interleukin-2. These therapies function exclusively by activating the immune system. Furthermore, Rose Bengal and electrochemotherapy have been included, as bystander effects have been observed with these treatments. EXPERT OPINION: Objective remissions are achieved in a higher percentage with intralesional immunotherapies, such as intralesional interleukin-2 with up to 69% of complete remissions, as compared to systemic treatment. Therefore, intralesional immunotherapy may act as supplement in the armament against metastatic melanoma. In particular, for patients with multiple cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases (20­≥ 100) and in patients with subcutaneous bulky disease intralesional immunotherapy can improve the disease outcome. The exact role of intralesional immunotherapy in the age of immune checkpoint blockade has still to be determined. A number of clinical trials are on the way in order to better understand synergistic actions of intralesional and systemic immunotherapy.