Remote severity assessment in atopic dermatitis: Validity and reliability of the remote Eczema Area and Severity Index and Self-Administered Eczema Area and Severity Index.

Background: Reliable assessment of atopic dermatitis (AD) severity is necessary for clinical practice and research. Valid and reliable remote assessment is essential to facilitate remote care and research. Objectives: Assess the validity and reliability of the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) based on images and patient-assessed severity based on the Self-Administered EASI (SA-EASI). Methods: Whole-body clinical images were taken during consultation from children with AD. After consultations, caregivers completed the SA-EASI and provided images from home. Four raters assessed all images twice using EASI. Results: A total of 1534 clinical images and 425 patient-provided images were collected from 87 and 32 children. Excellent (0.90) validity, good inter (0.77) and intrarater reliability (0.91), and standard error of measurement (4.31) was found for the EASI based on clinical images. Feasibility of patient-provided images showed limitations with missing images (43.8%) and quality issues (23.1%). However, good validity (0.86), inter (0.74) and intrarater reliability (0.94) were found when assessment was possible. Moderate correlation (0.60) between SA-EASI and EASI was found. Limitations: Low portion patient-provided images. Conclusion: AD severity assessment based on images strongly correlates with in-person AD assessment. Good measurement properties confirm the potential of remote assessment. Moderate correlation between SA-EASI and in-person EASI suggest limited value of self-assessment.

Treatment Experiences with Intravenous Immunoglobulins, Ixekizumab, Dupilumab, and Anakinra in Netherton Syndrome: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Netherton syndrome (NS) is a rare potential life-threatening disorder that causes severe defects to the skin barrier. No effective treatment options are available for patients with NS and current therapy is mostly supportive. The effects of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), ixekizumab, and dupilumab have scarcely been reported. Additionally, the role of anakinra in patients with NS has never been investigated. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to report our experiences of treatment with IVIG, ixekizumab, dupi-lumab, and anakinra in patients with NS. METHODS: A retrospective case series, including 5 patients with NS, was performed in a tertiary referral hospital between 2016 and 2021. Patients were treated with IVIG, ixekizumab, dupilumab, and/or anakinra. Long-term experiences with treatment regimens and adverse events requiring medical attention were reported. RESULTS: IVIG, ixekizumab, dupilumab, and anakinra were well tolerated with no severe adverse events. The 2 patients that received IVIG showed clinical response for 6 months and 2.5 years. Ixekizumab was effective in 1 of our patients for 3.5 years, while in another patient ixekizumab lost its effect after 1.5 years. Dupilumab treatment did not result in persistent improvement of NS-related skin symptoms in 1 patient. Anakinra showed physician-assessed clinical response during the first months of treatment in 4 patients with NS. During anakinra treatment, no changes in blood levels of IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α levels were measured at routine blood examinations. CONCLUSIONS: This case series suggests that the use of IVIG, ixekizumab, dupilumab, and anakinra in NS is safe and moderately effective on the short term. On the long term, a decline in effect was observed. Our experiences may help clinicians and researchers to provide adequate care and develop treatment for these severely affected patients. More international research, especially on the long term, is needed to determine if and which patients benefit most from the emerging therapies for NS.

Outcomes of Systemic Treatment in Children and Adults With Netherton Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Background: Comèl-Netherton syndrome (NS) is a rare disease caused by pathogenic variants in the SPINK5 gene, leading to severe skin barrier impairment and proinflammatory upregulation. Given the severity of the disease, treatment of NS is challenging. Current treatment regimens are mainly topical and supportive. Although novel systemic treatment options for NS have been suggested in recent literature, little is known about their outcomes. Objective: to provide an overview of systemic treatment options and their outcomes in adults and children with NS. Methods: Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar were searched up to July 22, 2021. Empirical studies published in English language mentioning systemic treatment in NS were enrolled. Studies that did not define a treatment period or report at least one outcome were excluded. Methodological quality was evaluated by the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports or case series. Overall quality of evidence of the primary outcome, skin, was assessed by the GRADE approach. Results: 36 case series and case reports were included. The effects of 15 systemic therapies were described in 48 patients, of which 27 were children. Therapies included retinoids, prednisolone, cyclosporine, immunoglobulins, and biologicals. In retinoids both worsening (4/15 cases) and improvement (6/15 cases) of the skin was observed. Use of prednisolone and cyclosporine was only reported in one patient. Immunoglobulins (13/15 cases) and biologicals (18/21 cases) showed improvement of the skin. Certainty of evidence was rated as very low. Conclusion: NS is a rare disease, which is reflected in the scarce literature on systemic treatment outcomes in children and adults with NS. Studies showed large heterogeneity in outcome measures. Adverse events were scarcely reported. Long-term outcomes were reported in a minority of cases. Nonetheless, a general beneficial effect of systemic treatment was found. Immunoglobulins and biologicals showed the most promising results and should be further explored. Future research should focus on determining a core outcome set and measurement instruments for NS to improve quality of research. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=217933, PROSPERO (ID: 217933).