To be or not to be vaccinated: The risk of MS or NMOSD relapse after COVID-19 vaccination and infection.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccination and infection are speculated to increase the activity of immune-mediated diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). The aim of this study was to evaluate a short-term risk of relapse after COVID-19 vaccination and COVID-19 infection in patients with these demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system and to determine disease exacerbation risk factors. METHODS: Data in this retrospective, observational cohort study was collected via the Czech nationwide registry ReMuS from March 1, 2020, to October 30, 2021. We compared the proportion of patients with at least one clinical relapse in the 90 days following vaccination or infection to the 90-day intervals during the year before. For the evaluation of the risk factors of relapse, a comparison between groups with and without relapses after COVID-19 vaccination or infection was made. RESULTS: We identified 1661 vaccinated (90.11% BNT162b2) patients with MS without a history of COVID-19 and 495 unvaccinated patients with MS who experienced COVID-19. A mild increase in the proportion of patients with at least one clinical relapse (-360 to -270 days: 4.46%; -270 to -180: 4.27%; -180 to -90: 3.85%; -90 to 0: 3.79% vs. 0 to +90 days: 5.30%) after vaccination in patients with MS was observed, as well as a rise in the proportion of patients with at least one clinical relapse after COVID-19. Lower age was associated with MS relapse after vaccination or infection. Although there were only 17 vaccinated and eight post-COVID-19 patients with NMOSD, the results were broadly consistent with those of patients with MS. CONCLUSION: There is a mild increase in the relapse incidence after the COVID-19 vaccination. The risks, however, need to be balanced against the risks of COVID-19 itself, also leading to the rise in relapse rate and particularly to morbidity and mortality.

Predictive factors for a severe course of COVID-19 infection in myasthenia gravis patients with an overall impact on myasthenic outcome status and survival.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Myasthenia gravis (MG) patients could be a vulnerable group in the pandemic era of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) mainly due to respiratory muscle weakness, older age and long-term immunosuppressive treatment. We aimed to define factors predicting the severity of COVID-19 in MG patients and risk of MG exacerbation during COVID-19. METHODS: We evaluated clinical features and outcomes after COVID-19 in 93 MG patients. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (38%) had severe pneumonia and we recorded 10 deaths (11%) due to COVID-19. Higher forced vital capacity (FVC) values tested before COVID-19 were shown to be protective against severe infection (95% CI 0.934-0.98) as well as good control of MG measured by the quantified myasthenia gravis score (95% CI 1.047-1.232). Long-term chronic corticosteroid treatment worsened the course of COVID-19 in MG patients (95% CI 1.784-111.43) and this impact was positively associated with dosage (p = 0.005). Treatment using azathioprine (95% CI 0.448-2.935), mycophenolate mofetil (95% CI 0.91-12.515) and ciclosporin (95% CI 0.029-2.212) did not influence the course of COVID-19. MG patients treated with rituximab had a high risk of death caused by COVID-19 (95% CI 3.216-383.971). Exacerbation of MG during infection was relatively rare (15%) and was not caused by remdesivir, convalescent plasma or favipiravir (95% CI 0.885-10.87). CONCLUSIONS: As the most important predictors of severe COVID-19 in MG patients we identified unsatisfied condition of MG with lower FVC, previous long-term corticosteroid treatment especially in higher doses, older age, the presence of cancer, and recent rituximab treatment.

Two-year outcome of thymectomy with or without immunosuppressive treatment in nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis and its effect on regulatory T cells.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the autoimmune disorder in which the thymus is considered the pathogenic organ. Thymectomy (TE) is a therapeutic option for MG and often ameliorates clinical symptoms. METHODS: We evaluated clinical features and outcomes after TE in patients without thymoma and the influence of TE with or without concomitant immunotherapy on the CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cell subpopulation of lymphocytes in peripheral blood in defined followed groups of nonthymomatous MG patients. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients with generalized MG who underwent transsternal TE were identified. Neurologic outcomes after TE were favorable for the majority of patients mainly from the group treated with corticosteroids or combined immunosuppressive treatment. TEs with immunosuppressive treatment in MG patients were associated with increased percentages of CD4(+)CD25(+) cells (p<0.001). No significant change in the postoperative levels of CD4(+)CD25(+) cells was observed in thymectomized patients who preoperatively only received pyridostigmine. Also their clinical response to TE after 2 years of follow-up was worst of all followed groups. CONCLUSIONS: The exact mechanism by which TE ameliorates symptoms of MG is yet not clear. These observations indicate that increased percentages of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells in MG may be related to disease stability and that TE and synergistic effect with concomitant, continuing immunotherapy augmented the proportion of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells. On the basis of our observations TE alone is not enough to increase the number of circulating CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells and to establish complete stable remission.

Transport rankings of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs across blood-brain barrier in vitro models.

The aim of this work was to conduct a comprehensive study about the transport properties of NSAIDs across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in vitro. Transport studies with celecoxib, diclofenac, ibuprofen, meloxicam, piroxicam and tenoxicam were accomplished across Transwell models based on cell line PBMEC/C1-2, ECV304 or primary rat brain endothelial cells. Single as well as group substance studies were carried out. In group studies substance group compositions, transport medium and serum content were varied, transport inhibitors verapamil and probenecid were added. Resulted permeability coefficients were compared and normalized to internal standards diazepam and carboxyfluorescein. Transport rankings of NSAIDs across each model were obtained. Single substance studies showed similar rankings as corresponding group studies across PBMEC/C1-2 or ECV304 cell layers. Serum content, glioma conditioned medium and inhibitors probenecid and verapamil influenced resulted permeability significantly. Basic differences of transport properties of the investigated NSAIDs were similar comparing all three in vitro BBB models. Different substance combinations in the group studies and addition of probenecid and verapamil suggested that transporter proteins are involved in the transport of every tested NSAID. Results especially underlined the importance of same experimental conditions (transport medium, serum content, species origin, cell line) for proper data comparison.

Markers of bone remodeling predict rate of bone loss in multiple sclerosis patients treated with low dose glucocorticoids.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of markers of bone remodeling in assessment of rate of bone loss in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) long term treated with low dose glucocorticoids. METHODS: The study involved 70 patients with MS. Motor function of the patients was evaluated using the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (KEDSS). Bone mineral density (BMD) was determined at the lumbar spine and proximal femur at baseline and after 1.8 +/- 0.8 years. Bone remodeling was assessed using circulating concentrations of type 1 collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (beta CTX), aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen, and N-MID osteocalcin (OC). A control group of 140 age-matched healthy subjects was used to compare bone-turnover markers. RESULTS: The plasma CTX concentration was the most significant parameter of bone remodeling which correlated with the rate of bone loss and with the KEDSS. The rate of bone loss at the proximal femur was not significantly different between tertiles of plasma OC concentrations. CONCLUSION: In physically active patients with MS treated with low-dose GC, the bone-turnover markers were not different from controls. Patients having plasma CTX but markers of bone formation higher as compared to controls were confirmed 2 years later as bone losers.