Pediatric Facility Recognition Program and the Illinois EMSC Experience.

Emergency medical services (EMS) systems were initially developed in the United States during the late 1960s. Modeled from military experiences, EMS demonstrated that survival for prehospital patients could be improved with enhanced field triage, treatment, and transport protocols. Over the next few decades, it was identified that children and adolescents had poorer outcomes in similar acute medical situations as compared to adults. To address this, the emergency medical services for children (EMSC) program was established in 1985 as a federal initiative to ensure appropriate resources and adequately trained personnel are available to meet the emergency care needs of children who are critically ill and injured. In 1994, the Illinois EMSC program was established and a pediatric facility recognition program to improve the emergency care of pediatric patients was rolled out in 1998. This article reviews the development of EMSC facility recognition programs and discusses their unique characteristics and contributions to improved pediatric emergency care. [Pediatr Ann. 2021;50(4):e165-e171.].

Lacerations and Embedded Needles Caused by Epinephrine Autoinjector Use in Children.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Epinephrine autoinjector use for anaphylaxis is increasing. There are reports of digit injections because of incorrect autoinjector use, but no previous reports of lacerations, to our knowledge. We report complications of epinephrine autoinjector use in children and discuss features of these devices, and their instructions for use, and how these may contribute to injuries. METHODS: We queried emergency medicine e-mail discussion lists and social media allergy groups to identify epinephrine autoinjector injuries involving children. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases of epinephrine autoinjector-related injuries are described. Twenty-one occurred during intentional use for the child's allergic reaction. Seventeen children experienced lacerations. In 4 cases, the needle stuck in the child's limb. In 1 case, the device lacerated a nurse's finger. The device associated with the injury was operated by health care providers (6 cases), the patient's parent (12 cases, including 2 nurses), educators (3 cases), and the patient (1 case). Of the 3 epinephrine autoinjectors currently available in North America, none include instructions to immobilize the child's leg. Only 1 has a needle that self-retracts; the others have needles that remain in the thigh during the 10 seconds that the user is instructed to hold the device against the leg. Instructions do not caution against reinjection if the needle is dislodged during these 10 seconds. CONCLUSION: Epinephrine autoinjectors are lifesaving devices in the management of anaphylaxis. However, some have caused lacerations and other injuries in children. Minimizing needle injection time, improving device design, and providing instructions to immobilize the leg before use may decrease the risk of these injuries.