Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 110(11): 1549-58, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26416188

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Barrett's esophagus (BE) surveillance with white-light endoscopy and quadrantic biopsies (Seattle protocol) is resource intensive and limited by sampling error. Previous work suggests that autofluorescence imaging (AFI) in combination with a molecular panel might reduce the number of biopsies, but this was not sufficiently sensitive for low-grade dysplasia, now a point for endoscopic intervention. Here we used AFI to direct narrow-field imaging tools for real-time optical assessment of dysplasia and biopsies for a biomarker panel. We compared the new diagnostic algorithm with the current standard. METHODS: A total of 55 patients with BE were recruited at a single tertiary referral center. Patients underwent high-resolution endoscopy followed by AFI. AFI-targeted areas (n=194) were examined in turn by narrow-band imaging with magnification (NBIz) and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE). Biopsies were taken from AFI-targeted areas and tested using an established molecular panel comprising aneuploidy plus cyclin A and p53 immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In the per-patient analysis the overall sensitivity and specificity of AFI-targeted pCLE were 100% and 53.6% for high-grade dysplasia/intramucosal cancer and 96.4% and 74.1% for any grade of dysplasia, respectively. NBIz had equal specificity for dysplasia detection (74.1%), but significantly lower sensitivity (57.1%) than pCLE. The time required to perform AFI-targeted pCLE was shorter that that taken by the Seattle protocol (P=0.0004). We found enrichment of molecular abnormalities in areas with optical dysplasia by pCLE (P<0.001), regardless of histologic dysplasia. The addition of the 3-biomarker panel reduced the false positive rate of pCLE by 50%, leading to sensitivity and specificity for any grade of dysplasia of 89.2% and 88.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pCLE on AFI-targeted areas and a 3-biomarker panel identifies patients with dysplasia.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/metabolismo , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Imagen Óptica , Lesiones Precancerosas/química , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Espera Vigilante/métodos , Anciano , Algoritmos , Aneuploidia , Esófago de Barrett/genética , Biomarcadores/análisis , Biopsia , Ciclina A/análisis , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esofagoscopía , Esófago/patología , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Microscopía Confocal/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen de Banda Estrecha , Lesiones Precancerosas/genética , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/análisis
2.
Gut ; 64(1): 49-56, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24721904

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is limited by sampling error and the subjectivity of diagnosing dysplasia. We aimed to compare a biomarker panel on minimal biopsies directed by autofluorescence imaging (AFI) with the standard surveillance protocol to derive an objective tool for dysplasia assessment. DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional prospective study in three tertiary referral centres. Patients with BO underwent high-resolution endoscopy followed by AFI-targeted biopsies. 157 patients completed the biopsy protocol. Aneuploidy/tetraploidy; 9p and 17p loss of heterozygosity; RUNX3, HPP1 and p16 methylation; p53 and cyclin A immunohistochemistry were assessed. Bootstrap resampling was used to select the best diagnostic biomarker panel for high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early cancer (EC). This panel was validated in an independent cohort of 46 patients. RESULTS: Aneuploidy, p53 immunohistochemistry and cyclin A had the strongest association with dysplasia in the per-biopsy analysis and, as a panel, had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.99) for diagnosing HGD/EC. The diagnostic accuracy for HGD/EC of the three-biomarker panel from AFI+ areas was superior to AFI- areas (p<0.001). Compared with the standard protocol, this panel had equal sensitivity for HGD/EC, with a 4.5-fold reduction in the number of biopsies. In an independent cohort of patients, the panel had a sensitivity and specificity for HGD/EC of 100% and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A three-biomarker panel on a small number of AFI-targeted biopsies provides an accurate and objective diagnosis of dysplasia in BO. The clinical implications have to be studied further.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/patología , Biomarcadores/análisis , Esofagoscopía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Óptica , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA