Research in global health emergencies

In January 2020, we published the findings of a two year in-depth inquiry into the ethical issues relating to research in global health emergencies. The inquiry was run by an international working group which gathered evidence and experience from many contributors across the globe. Better evidence about what helps or doesn’t help during an emergency is needed in order to improve the response to global health emergencies. Research conducted during an emergency itself plays a crucial role in obtaining this evidence, and helps support the immediate response, as well as learning for the future. The aim of the report is to identify ways in which research can be undertaken ethically during emergencies, in order to promote the contribution that ethically-conducted research can make to improving current and future emergency preparedness and response. We have made 24 recommendations to ‘duty bearers’ such as research funders, research organisations, governments, and researchers. These are summarised in our call for action. We suggest changes that would align their policies and practices more closely to three core values of fairness, equal respect, and helping reduce suffering. The report presents these values in the form of an ‘ethical compass’ to guide the conduct of the very wide range of people involved in research in global health emergencies.

Investigación en emergencias sanitarias globales: cuestiones éticas breve reseña / Research in global health emergencies: ethical issues brief review

Este documento describe los principales temas, hallazgos y recomendaciones del informe del Consejo Nuffield sobre Bioética Investigaciones en emergencias sanitarias globales: cuestiones éticas (publicado en enero de 2020). El informe sigue una investigación en profundidad de dos años realizada por un grupo de trabajo internacional, que se benefició de la evidencia y la experiencia compartida por muchos colaboradores de todo el mundo (ver el mapa a continuación para conocer las ubicaciones de los colaboradores). Las contribuciones se realizaron a través de las respuestas a una convocatoria abierta para evidencia, la participación en mesas redondas y reuniones individuales, la crítica de los primeros borradores del informe y la participación en talleres y eventos internacionales.