Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Tech Coloproctol ; 26(11): 851-862, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35596904

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Formation of a defunctioning loop ileostomy is common after mid and low rectal resection. Historically, they were reversed between 3 and 6 months after initial resection. Recently, earlier closure (< 14 days) has been suggested by some current randomised controlled trials. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of early stoma closure on surgical and patient outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of the current randomised controlled trial literature comparing early and standard ileostomy closure after rectal surgery was performed. Specifically, we examined surgical outcomes including; morbidity, mortality and quality of life. RESULTS: Six studies met the predefined criteria and were included in our analysis. 275 patients underwent early stoma closure compared with 259 patients having standard closure. Overall morbidity was similar between both groups (25.5% vs. 21.6%) (OR, 1.47; 95% CI 0.75-2.87). However, there tended to be more reoperations (8.4 vs. 4.2%) (OR, 2.02, 95% CI 0.99-4.14) and small bowel obstructions/postoperative ileus (9.3% vs. 4.4%) (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.90) in the early closure group, but no difference across the other domains. CONCLUSIONS: Early closure appears to be a feasible in highly selective cases after good perioperative counselling and shared decision-making. Further research on quality of life outcomes and long term benefits is necessary to help define which patients are suitable candidates for early closure.


Asunto(s)
Ileostomía , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Ileostomía/métodos , Ileus , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía
3.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 104(5): e137-e138, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34730417

RESUMEN

Pneumothoraces may occur rarely in coronavirus (COVID-19) patients, often resulting from a combination of fibrotic parenchymal changes and prolonged high-pressure ventilation. Very few studies have been published describing the management of pneumothorax in the novel COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Although chest drain insertion represents the first line of treatment, a persistent pneumothorax and air leak requiring intervention could be managed by a thoracoscopic procedure or, as is the case here, by endobronchial valve insertion. Endobronchial valve insertion is a minimally invasive technique that provides a treatment option in patients with severe parenchymal COVID-19 related lung disease. As far as the authors are aware this is the first report of the use of endobronchial valves in a COVID-19 patient.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neumotórax , Broncoscopía/métodos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Tubos Torácicos , Humanos , Neumotórax/etiología , Neumotórax/cirugía , Prótesis e Implantes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...