[Results of a post-marketing surveillance of meropenem for febrile neutropenia].

The post-marketing surveillance of meropenem (Meropen) for febrile neutropenia (FN) was conducted between July 2010 and June 2012 to evaluate safety and efficacy under actual clinical use. There were 1191 and 1124 evaluable cases for safety and efficacy respectively, of 1207 case cards collected from 180 institutions. In safety analysis, the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with use of meropenem (including abnormal laboratory findings) was 15.7% (187/1191 cases), and the main ADRs were alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood alkaline phosphatase increased, hepatic function abnormal, and liver disorder, which were similar to these observed in the clinical study for FN or post marketing surveillances of meropenem conducted before. In efficacy analysis, the overall efficacy was 81.8% (919/1124 cases). Also, it was 79.2% (708/894 cases) for hematological malignancy and 91.8% (213/232 cases) for solid cancer. These results confirmed meropenem (Meropen) is one of the well-tolerated and potent antimicrobial agents for febrile neutropenia.

The therapeutic advantage of combination antihypertensive drug therapy using amlodipine and irbesartan in hypertensive patients: Analysis of the post-marketing survey data from PARTNER (Practical combination therapy of Amlodin and angiotensin II Receptor blocker; safety and efficacy in patients with hypertension) study.

Two-thirds of hypertensive patients need a combination antihypertensive therapy to achieve the target blood pressure (BP). The PARTNER (Practical combination therapy of Amlodin and angiotensin II Receptor blocker; Safety and efficacy in paTieNts with hypERtension) study is a prospective specific clinical use survey examining the efficacy and safety of 12-week treatment with amlodipine (AML) and Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) in 5900 hypertensive patients. The current analysis was performed as to the BP control, adverse reactions, and the effects on laboratory data in patients treated with the combination of AML and irbesartan (IRB), namely the patients added AML to already taking IRB (AML add-on group, n = 1202) and the patients added IRB to AML (IRB add-on group, n = 1050). Both study groups showed distinct decreases in office BP at 4 week (p < 0.001) and the antihypertensive effects were sustained to 12 week (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving BP < 140/90 mmHg was ∼70% in either group. Proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were significantly improved in hypertensive patients with baseline eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Serum uric acid was reduced either by adding AML or IRB, and the reductions were prominent in patients with serum uric acid >7 mg/dl. The incidence of adverse reactions was as few as 1.11% and there were no severe adverse reactions which hampered the continuation of combination therapy. In conclusion, combination antihypertensive therapy with AML and IRB effectively lowers BP without particular safety problems, reduces serum uric acid especially in patients with hyperuricemia and exhibits renoprotective effects in patients with chronic kidney disease.

[Results of a post-marketing surveillance of meropenem administered over 2 g/day for serious infectious diseases].

The post-marketing surveillance of meropenem (Meropen®) administered over 2g/day for serious infectious diseases was conducted between August 2011 and June 2013 to evaluate safety and efficacy under actual clinical use. There were 382 and 322 evaluable cases for safety and efficacy respectively, of 399 case cards collected from 87 institutions. In safety analysis, the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with use of meropenem (including abnormal laboratory findings) was 19.1% (73/382 cases), and the main ADRs were hepatic function abnormal, aspartate aminotransferase increased, alanine aminotransferase increased, liver disorder, and diarrhoea, which were similar to these observed in the post-marketing surveillances of meropenem conducted before. In efficacy analysis, the efficacy was 73.6% (237/322 cases), which is as same as 71.4% (3214/4504 cases) of post-marketing surveillance of meropenem conducted after first approval under 2 g/day for infectious diseases. These results confirmed meropenem (Meropen®) is one of the useful antimicrobial agents for serious infectious diseases.

Adding interferon to lamivudine enhances the early virologic response and reversion of the precore mutation in difficult-to-treat HBV infection.

BACKGROUND: The virologic impact of adding interferon to antiviral nucleoside therapy was studied in Japanese patients having perinatally transmitted hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype C. METHODS: Sixty-four patients including 41 positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) were assigned to receive either (1) a combination of interferon-alpha (6 million units daily for 2 weeks, then three times weekly) plus lamivudine (100 mg daily) for 24 weeks followed by lamivudine alone for 28 weeks (n = 30) or (2) 52-week lamivudine monotherapy (n = 34). RESULTS: The combination treatment enhanced the early virologic response, and HBV clearance was more frequent at week 8 for patients with baseline HBV DNA < or = 7 log copies/ml (90% vs. 33%, P = 0.013) and at week 24 for patients with baseline HBV DNA > 7 log copies/ml (75% vs. 40%, P = 0.080). In the combination arm, YMDD mutants emerged less often at week 52 (8% vs. 30%, P = 0.047). However, reversion of the precore mutation was more prominent with combination treatment than with monotherapy (McNemar test, P = 0.014 and P = 0.103, respectively). HBeAg seroconversion (P = 0.429) and sustained off-treatment HBV suppression to < or =5 log copies/ml (log-rank test, P = 0.195) were not improved. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous commencement of treatment with interferon and a nucleoside analog may be worthy as a treatment option to augment the early virologic response and prevent drug resistance in difficult-to-treat patients. Combination treatment was also shown to enhance reversion of the precore mutation. Further studies are warranted to clarify the therapeutic implications of this phenomenon.