Minimalistic approach to enhanced recovery after pediatric scoliosis surgery.

PURPOSE: Prior studies of enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) have been conducted at large institutions with abundant resources. These results may not apply at institutions with less resources directed to quality improvement efforts. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of a minimalistic enhanced recovery protocol in reducing length of stay (LOS) following PSF for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. We hypothesized that accelerated transition to oral pain medications and mobilization alone could shorten hospital length of stay in the absence of a formal multimodal pain regimen. METHODS: AIS patients aged 10-18 who underwent PSF at a tertiary pediatric hospital between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017 were reviewed. The study population was further narrowed to consecutive patients from a single surgeon's practice that piloted the modified ERP. Reservation from key stakeholders regarding the feasibility of implementing widespread protocol change led to the minimal alterations made to the postoperative protocol following PSF. Patients were divided into either the Standard Recovery Protocol (SRP) or Enhanced Recovery Protocol (ERP). Primary variables analyzed were hospital LOS, complications, readmissions, and total narcotic requirement. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients met inclusion criteria. SRP and ERP groups consisted of 44 (47.8%) and 48 (52.2%) patients. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to age, sex, and ASA score (p > 0.05). Fusion levels and EBL did not differ between treatment groups (p > 0.05). PCA pumps were discontinued later in the SRP group (39.5 ± 4.3 h) compared to the ERP group (17.4 ± 4.1 h, p < 0.0001). Narcotic requirement was similar between groups (p = 0.94) Patients in the SRP group had longer hospital stays than patients in the ERP group (p < 0.0001). 83% of the ERP group had LOS ≤ 3 days compared to 0% in the SRP group, whose mean LOS was 4.2 days. There was no difference in complications between the groups (2.2% vs 6.0%, p = 0.62). Readmission to the hospital within 30 days of surgery was rare in either group (2 SRP patients: 1 superior mesenteric artery syndrome, 1 bowel obstruction vs 0 ERP patients, p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, minor changes to the postoperative protocol following surgery for AIS led to a significant decrease in hospital length of stay. This minimalistic approach may ease implementation of an ERP in the setting of stakeholder apprehension.

The Impact of Cast Immobilization on Return to Daycare.

BACKGROUND: Children who are prohibited from returning to daycare (RTD) after treatment with cast immobilization place an increased burden on parents and caregivers. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of cast immobilization on RTD. Specifically, we sought to determine the prevalence of RTD after orthopaedic immobilization based on daycare facility policy. METHODS: This was a survey study of randomly selected daycare facilities servicing a total of 6662 children within 10 miles of a major metropolitan city center. The 40-question survey included information on daycare policies and experience caring for children treated with orthopaedic immobilization. The survey also included questions about daycare type, enrollment, and geographic location. Photographs of the types of immobilization were embedded in the survey to facilitate understanding. Daycare facilities were randomly selected based on a power analysis to estimate a 50% prevalence of RTD after spica casting within 10% margin of error. RESULTS: Seventy-three daycare facilities completed the survey study. The average child-staff ratio was 5:1 and most daycare facilities (78%) did not have a nurse on staff. Predetermined policies regarding RTD after injury were available at 81% of daycares. Twenty-eight (38.5%) facilities had encountered a child with a cast in the previous year. The rate of RTD for children with upper limb injuries was 90.5% compared with 79% for lower limb injuries (P=0.003). Spica casts showed the lowest RTD rate: single leg (22.5%), 1 and a half leg (18%), and 2 leg (16%) (P<0.0001). Experienced daycare facilities (>5 y) had a higher RTD rate compared with less experienced facilities (P=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: The ability to RTD is dependent on immobilization type. Children with long leg and spica casts are disproportionately restricted when compared with other cast types. At minimum, surgeons should consider the socioeconomic implications of orthopaedic immobilization. There is also a need for orthopaedic involvement in policy formation at the local level to provide standardized guidelines for re-entry into childcare facilities following orthopaedic immobilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.