United and flexible: a collaborative approach to early vocational rehabilitation on a spinal unit. A realist study.

STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative study using realist review. OBJECTIVES: To conceptualise how Early Intervention Vocational Rehabilitation (EIVR) functions within inpatient multidisciplinary contexts during spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. SETTING: New Zealand Spinal Unit. METHODS: People with newly acquired SCI and members of their rehabilitation team were observed in a range of rehabilitation sessions, team meetings and therapeutic interactions. Participants were also interviewed to explore how EIVR functioned alongside the multidisciplinary team (MDT). Interviews and observations were transcribed, coded and analysed using realist methods. RESULTS: We identified three primary contexts which influenced how EIVR was delivered within the MDT: (1) a united approach, (2) a flexible approach, and (3) a hesitant approach. These contexts generated four work-related outcomes for people with SCI; enhanced work self-efficacy, strengthened hope for work, maintained work identity, and the less desirable outcome of increased uncertainty about work. CONCLUSIONS: To optimise work outcomes for people after SCI, it is important to consider how EIVR is delivered and integrated within the wider MDT. Such an understanding can also inform the establishment of new EIVR services in different settings. Results suggest that unity, flexibility and clarity between EIVR services and the wider MDT are essential foundations for supporting people with SCI on their journey to employment. SPONSORSHIP: This research was funded by Health Research Council NZ grant in partnership with Canterbury District Health Board.

Experiences of persons with spinal cord injury undertaking a physical activity programme as part of the SCIPA 'Full-On' randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: For individuals with spinal cord injury the long term benefits of physical activity are well documented, however the majority of this population report inactivity secondary to participatory barriers. Research investigating physically intensive exercise programs for people with spinal cord injury is limited, with even less attention paid to the experience of the participants. OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences of persons with spinal cord injury of their participation in the New Zealand arm of the Spinal Cord Injury and Physical Activity (SCIPA) 'Full-On' randomized controlled trial. METHOD: Eight participants recruited to SCIPA Full-On completed individual virtual video diary interviews three times across the duration of their twelve week Full-On trial. Expectations and highs and lows of the program were recorded via a webcam. The video diary data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively for themes. RESULTS: Three independent themes were identified from the data: the participants' excitement of opportunity to participate in SCIPA Full-On' randomized controlled trial, personal rewards from participation and also the frustrations to participation they experienced. CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable information on factors that motivate participation in physical activity for individuals with spinal cord injury, within a research setting. The findings highlighted the importance of accessibility and a supportive network which may be a way to provide individuals with spinal cord injury the means to become self-efficacious to participate in community physical activity outside of the research environment.