Repairing Volumetric Muscle Loss in the Ovine Peroneus Tertius Following a 6-Month Recovery.

Tissue-engineered skeletal muscle is a promising novel therapy for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss (VML). Our laboratory has developed tissue-engineered skeletal muscle units (SMUs) and engineered neural conduits (ENCs), and modularly scaled them to clinically relevant sizes for the treatment of VML in a large animal (sheep) model. In a previous study, we evaluated the effects of the SMUs and ENCs in treating a 30% VML injury in the ovine peroneus tertius muscle after a 3-month recovery period. The goal of the current study was to expand on our 3-month study and evaluate the SMUs and ENCs in restoring muscle function after a 6-month recovery period. Six months after implantation, we found that the repair groups with the SMU (VML+SMU and VML+SMU+ENC) restored muscle mass to a level that was statistically indistinguishable from the uninjured contralateral muscle. In contrast, the muscle mass in the VML-Only group was significantly less than groups repaired with an SMU. Following the 6-month recovery from VML, the maximum tetanic force was significantly lower for all VML injured groups compared with the uninjured contralateral muscle. However, we did demonstrate the ability of our ENCs to effectively regenerate nerve between the distal stump of the native nerve and the repair site in 14 of the 15 animals studied. Impact Statement Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is a clinically relevant problem for which current treatment options are lacking and for which tissue-engineered skeletal muscle presents a promising novel therapeutic option. However, the fabrication of tissues of clinically relevant sizes is necessary for advancement of the technology to the clinic. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of our scaled-up tissue-engineered skeletal muscle to treat VML in a large animal (sheep) model after a 6-month recovery.

Repairing Volumetric Muscle Loss in the Ovine Peroneus Tertius Following a 3-Month Recovery.

Much effort has been made to fabricate engineered tissues on a scale that is clinically relevant to humans; however, scale-up remains one of the most significant technological challenges of tissue engineering to date. To address this limitation, our laboratory has developed tissue-engineered skeletal muscle units (SMUs) and engineered neural conduits (ENCs), and modularly scaled them to clinically relevant sizes for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss (VML). The goal of this study was to evaluate the SMUs and ENCs in vitro, and to test the efficacy of our SMUs and ENCs in restoring muscle function in a clinically relevant large animal (sheep) model. The animals received a 30% VML injury to the peroneus tertius muscle and were allowed to recover for 3 months. The animals were divided into three experimental groups: VML injury without a repair (VML only), repair with an SMU (VML+SMU), or repair with an SMU and ENC (VML+SMU+ENC). We evaluated the SMUs before implantation and found that our single scaled-up SMUs were characterized by the presence of contracting myotubes, linearly aligned extracellular matrix proteins, and Pax7+ satellite cells. Three months after implantation, we found that the repair groups (VML+SMU and VML+SMU+ENC) had restored muscle mass and tetanic force production to a level that was statistically indistinguishable from the uninjured contralateral muscle after 3 months in vivo. Furthermore, we demonstrated the ability of our ENCs to effectively bridge the gap between native nerve and the repair site by eliciting a muscle contraction through direct electrical stimulation of the re-routed nerve. Impact statement The fabrication of tissues of clinically relevant sizes is one of the largest obstacles preventing engineered tissues from achieving widespread use in the clinic. This study aimed to combat this limitation by developing a fabrication method to scale-up tissue-engineered skeletal muscle for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss in a large animal (sheep) model and evaluating the efficacy of the tissue-engineered constructs after a 3-month recovery.

The Effects of Engineered Skeletal Muscle on Volumetric Muscle Loss in The Tibialis Anterior Of Rat After Three Months In Vivo.

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is traumatic, degenerative, or surgical loss of skeletal muscle that exceeds the regenerative capacity of the remaining muscle, thus resulting in impaired muscle function. In humans, the loss of 30% or more mass of any one muscle will result in permanent structural and functional loss. Current VML repair treatments are limited by donor site morbidity and graft tissue availability, necessitating alternative muscle graft sources. To address this need, our lab has fabricated tissue-engineered skeletal muscle units (SMUs) for implantation into a 30 % VML model in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of rat. Previous results showed that after 28 days in vivo, muscle with a 30% VML repaired with our SMUs produced significantly more force than muscle with acute VML. But repair with our SMU did not fully restore muscle force production to that of native muscle. Thus, we hypothesized that more time for in vivo tissue regeneration would allow for greater force recovery. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the long-term (3-month) effects of our SMUs on a 30% VML repair. We also assessed the effects of reinnervation by redirecting a branch of the peroneal nerve to the repair site. Thirty-nine, 2-month old female F344 rats were separated into a nonsurgical control group (n=5) and four surgical experimental groups (VML Only, n=5; VML+Nerve Redirect, n=6; VML+SMU, n=5; VML+SMU+ Nerve Redirect, n=8). Experimental rats were allowed a 3-month recovery period post-surgery before undergoing in situ force testing of the surgical (left) TA. The left TA of the control animals also underwent in situ force testing. Finally, the surgical (left) and contralateral (right) TAs of the experimental animals, as well as the left TA of the control animals, were explanted for histological analysis. Results for specific force showed that while all groups recovered specific forces similar to that of native muscle, the two SMU groups had significantly higher specific forces, on average, compared to the uninjured control group. Histological staining showed small muscle fibers in the repair site in animals that received an SMU. The average cross-sectional area of the native fibers just outside the area of repair (or the equivalent area in control animals) was not significantly different between groups, indicating that hypertrophy of remaining fibers did not contribute to the recovery of force following the VML. Our results suggest that following a 30% VML of the TA muscle, all surgical groups were able to recover TA mass, maximum tetanic and specific force production. Thus, creating a 30% VML in the TA in a rat model is not enough a sufficient VML to produce the sustained VML seen in humans following similar 30% loss of muscle volume.