Association of alcohol use with olfactory function among older adults.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) has been recognized as an early biomarker for neurodegenerative diseases. Identifying behaviors that increase the risk of OD is crucial for early recognition of neurogenerative diseases. Alcohol consumption can potentially impact olfaction through its neurotoxic effects. This study aims to examine the relationship between alcohol consumption and OD, using data from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on data for 2757 adults from Round 1 of NSHAP. OD was defined as correctly identifying 0-3 odors in the 5-item Sniffin' Sticks test while normal olfactory function was defined as correctly identifying 4-5 odors. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to examine the association between alcohol consumption and OD, controlling for age, race, and comorbidities. Analyses were weighted to account for the sampling design. RESULTS: OD was present in 23.1 % of adults. The average age among those with OD was 71.2 ± 7.8 years, compared to 66.9 ± 7.2 years in those with normal olfaction. In terms of alcohol consumption, 31.1 % of adults with OD were light-to-moderate drinkers and 7.7 % were heavy drinkers, compared to 35.6 % light-to-moderate and 7.7 % heavy drinkers in the normal olfaction group. After adjusting for age, gender, race, and education, neither light-to-moderate drinking (aOR: 0.99; 95 % CI: 0.76-1.29) nor heavy drinking (aOR: 1.24; 95 % CI: 0.83-1.85) were significantly associated with OD. CONCLUSION: Alcohol consumption was not associated with OD after controlling for covariates. While this study provides insight into the relationship between alcohol consumption and OD, further research is needed due to conflicting results in previous studies.

Understanding Health Equity in Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are measures of patients' health that are conveyed directly by individual patients. These measures serve as instruments to evaluate the impact of interventions on any aspect of patients' health, from specific symptoms to broader quality of life indicators. However, their effectiveness relies on capturing relevant factors accurately. Whereas they are commonly used in clinical trials, PROs extend their influence across health care settings, informing clinicians, health care payers, regulators, and administrators to guide quality improvement and reimbursement decisions. Neglecting health equity considerations in PRO development and implementation widens health disparities, leading to biased interpretations, medical mismanagement, and poor health outcomes among marginalized groups. To foster equitable health care, efforts must focus on considering the values of underrepresented populations in PRO design, addressing barriers to completion, enhancing representation in research, providing cultural competency training for clinicians, and allocating research funding to support health equity research. By addressing these issues, advances can be made toward fostering inclusive, equitable health care for all individuals.

Housing Insecurity and Asthma Outcomes.

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with widespread prevalence that affects children, adolescents, and adults. Asthma morbidity and mortality can be exacerbated in the setting of housing insecurity. In this Grand Rounds Review article, we present a case and discuss the implications that housing insecurity has on asthma outcomes in the United States. We then highlight ways in which providers can advocate for patients with asthma and housing insecurity.

Coordinated Health Care Interventions for Childhood Asthma Gaps in Outcomes (CHICAGO) plan.

Background: Evidence-based strategies to improve outcomes in minority children with uncontrolled asthma discharged from the emergency department (ED) are needed. Objectives: This multicenter pragmatic clinical trial was designed to compare an ED-only intervention (decision support tool), an ED-only intervention and home visits by community health workers for 6 months (ED-plus-home), and enhanced usual care (UC). Methods: Children aged 5 to 11 years with uncontrolled asthma were enrolled. The change over 6 months in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Asthma Impact Scale score in children and Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles score in caregivers were the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes included guideline-recommended ED discharge care and self-management. Results: Recruitment was significantly lower than expected (373 vs 640 expected). Of the 373 children (64% Black and 31% Latino children), only 63% completed the 6-month follow-up visit. In multivariable analyses that accounted for missing data, the adjusted odds ratios and 98% CIs for differences in Asthma Impact Scores or caregivers' Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles scores were not significant. However, guideline-recommended ED discharge care was significantly improved in the intervention groups versus in the UC group, and self-management behaviors were significantly improved in the ED-plus-home group versus in the ED-only and UC groups. Conclusions: The ED-based interventions did not significantly improve the primary clinical outcomes, although the study was likely underpowered. Although guideline-recommended ED discharge care and self-management did improve, their effect on clinical outcomes needs further study.

Global Considerations in Asthma Treatment: Management in Low Resource Settings.

Low-resource settings have a disproportionately higher burden of asthma due to factors that include environmental triggers, access to healthcare, availability of medications, and uncoordinated health systems. The application of guideline-based management can vary, which further impacts the treatment delivered. This chapter aims to outline the global landscape of asthma management, including cultural and social factors, with suggestions for interventions.

The Association of Food Insecurity With Asthma Control in Adults During COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity has been associated with poorer asthma control in children, but research lacks in adults. OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of food insecurity and its association with asthma control in adults during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey study was conducted in US adults with asthma. Survey questions included how worried or concerned participants were about food security since the pandemic. Asthma control was assessed using the Asthma Control Test, with uncontrolled asthma defined as Asthma Control Test score less than or equal to 19. Self-report of food insecurity since the pandemic was assessed. Food insecurity variables were dichotomized into high insecurity (≥3) or low insecurity (<3). Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the total participants (N = 866), 82.79% were female; mean age of participants was 44 ± 15.05 years, their mean Asthma Control Test score was 19.25 ± 4.54, and 18.48% had high food insecurity. Participants with high food insecurity were more likely to have uncontrolled asthma (74.38%) compared with those with lower food insecurity (34.99%; P < .01). The relationship between asthma control and food insecurity remained significant after adjusting for age, education, sex, race, anxiety, and living stability concerns due to the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity exists in adults with asthma and is associated with uncontrolled asthma. Providers should consider screening their patients for food insecurity when treating individuals with uncontrolled asthma.

Building a new regional home for implementation science: Annual Midwest Clinical & Translational Research Meetings.

The vision of the Central Society for Clinical and Translational Research (CSCTR) is to "promote a vibrant, supportive community of multidisciplinary, clinical, and translational medical research to benefit humanity." Together with the Midwestern Section of the American Federation for Medical Research, CSCTR hosts an Annual Midwest Clinical & Translational Research Meeting, a regional multispecialty meeting that provides the opportunity for trainees and early-stage investigators to present their research to leaders in their fields. There is an increasing national and global interest in implementation science (IS), the systematic study of activities (or strategies) to facilitate the successful uptake of evidence-based health interventions in clinical and community settings. Given the growing importance of this field and its relevance to the goals of the CSCTR, in 2022, the Midwest Clinical & Translational Research Meeting incorporated new initiatives and sessions in IS. In this report, we describe the role of IS in the translational research spectrum, provide a summary of sessions from the 2022 Midwest Clinical & Translational Research Meeting, and highlight initiatives to complement national efforts to build capacity for IS through the annual meetings.

Associations of community-level particulate matter with high-acuity visit presentation for sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to particulate matter <2.5 µm in diameter (PM2.5) has been linked to increased sinusitis prevalence and morbidity. However, studies analyzing environmental exposures and sinusitis have not explored the effect of PM2.5 on healthcare presentation patterns. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize the relationship of community-level PM2.5 with high-acuity visits in sinusitis patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis based on medical records of 2092 adults presenting with chronic rhinosinusitis, acute rhinosinusitis, or sinus/nasal polyps to an urban academic medical center from 2010 to 2019 was conducted. We linked medical records (individual-level) with data on PM2.5 exposure at the community level, using residential zip-code data from the Chicago Health Atlas covering the years 2015-2019. Multivariable binary logistic regression with Generalized Estimating Equations examined adjusted associations between PM2.5 and high-acuity visits - including emergency department and inpatient settings. RESULTS: Our sample was 69 % female, with a mean age of 46.9 years. From 2015 to 2019, the average PM2.5 exposure in zip-codes examined was 11.66 µg/m3 with a range of 11.14-11.79 µg/m3. In adjusted models, odds of a high-acuity visit were significantly higher in patients residing in zip-codes in the top tertile of PM2.5 exposure compared to the bottom tertile (OR: 1.74; CI: 1.20-2.51). CONCLUSION: Community-level PM2.5 exposure was associated with high-acuity visits among sinusitis patients. These associations need to be studied through more rigorous, prospective investigations, as they may have potential public health implications and underscore a need to mitigate PM2.5 exposures at a community-level.

Demographic Factors and Comorbid Conditions Related to Health Care Presentation Among Patients With Sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDOH) and comorbid conditions (CMCs) influence the setting of presentation for care; however, few studies have explored this relationship in the context of sinus disease. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize the relationship of SDOH and CMCs with acuity of health care presentation setting in adults with sinusitis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis based on medical records (demographics, visit types, and ICD-10 codes) of 1842 adult patients presenting with sinusitis to an urban academic medical center was conducted. Chi-square analysis was used to assess bivariate associations of SDOH (age, race/ethnicity, sex, insurance type, and employment status) and CMCs (depression, body mass index [BMI], allergy, and gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD]) with high-acuity visit types-including emergency department (ED) and inpatient visits. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to examine the adjusted associations between SDOH and high-acuity visits. RESULTS: The sample's mean age was 46.8 years, with 68.5% females and 31.5% males. In adjusted models, the odds of high-acuity visit presentation was higher for males than females (odds ratio [OR]: 1.57; confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-2.01); non-Hispanic Blacks (OR: 2.21; CI: 1.58-3.09) as well as Hispanics/Latinos (OR: 2.10; CI:1.43-3.08) than Whites; unemployed (OR: 1.90; CI: 1.47-2.46.) than employed. Age was positively associated with high-acuity presentation. While GERD was associated with increased odds of high-acuity presentation (OR: 2.80; CI: 1.64-4.78), BMI, allergy, and depression did not have a statistically significant association with these visit types. These associations were independent of insurance coverage, which was not statistically associated with high-acuity visits. CONCLUSION: SDOH and CMCs were associated with high-acuity healthcare presentation in adults with sinusitis. While this study highlights how SDOH affect healthcare usage patterns among people with sinusitis, further investigation is needed to identify and address the causes of these patterns.

Results From a National Survey of Asthma Provider Beliefs and Practices Regarding Exercise and Asthma: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Committee on Sports, Exercise, and Fitness.

BACKGROUND: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines recommend regular physical activity (PA) for patients with asthma. Health care provider (HCP) counseling represents an effective approach to optimizing patient PA. However, current exercise rates among asthma patients are suboptimal, which suggests that counseling may be improved. OBJECTIVE: To understand PA counseling behaviors among HCPs who manage asthma. METHODS: A voluntary 36-item survey assessing self-reported awareness of PA recommendations and current clinical practices was sent to 979 randomly selected HCP members of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 9.3% (91 of 979). Respondents were physicians (100%) and allergists/immunologists (96%) who reported an average of 18.1 ± 12.3 years in independent practice. Over half (58%) reported personally engaging in 150 min/wk or more of moderate to strenuous PA. Eighty percent of participants were unaware of specific PA guidelines for patients with asthma, yet 66% acknowledged evidence for improved asthma outcomes with moderate exercise. A large majority of respondents believed that patients with asthma (97%) and severe asthma (84%) should pursue exercise. Whereas 90% of respondents support incorporating exercise counseling into asthma care, only 69% regularly counsel asthma patients about PA. Barriers cited included limited time, lack of knowledge regarding how and where to refer patients for exercise, and other medical priorities. Potential facilitators of PA included increasing practitioner education and patient-directed posters in waiting areas. CONCLUSIONS: Health care providers recognized PA as an important component of asthma care but were often unaware of specific guidelines. Promoting PA counseling may require using a time-efficient approach to implement counseling at each asthma patient encounter.

Pulmonary Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Asthma Diagnosis and Treatment (ADT) Interest Section.

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed increased demands on the ability to safely perform pulmonary procedures in keeping with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recommendations. Accordingly, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI) Asthma Diagnosis and Treatment convened this work group to offer guidance. The work group is composed of specialist practitioners from academic and both large and small practices. Individuals with special expertise were assigned sections on spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, nebulized treatments, and methacholine challenge. The work group met periodically to achieve consensus. This resulting document has recommendations for the allergy/asthma/immunology health care setting based on available evidence including reference documents from the CDC, ATS, and OSHA.

Age-based disparities in telehealth use in an urban, underserved population in cancer and pulmonary clinics: A need for policy change.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth rapidly emerged as an essential health care service and became particularly important for patients with cancer and chronic conditions. However, the benefits of telehealth have not been fully realized for some of the most vulnerable populations due to inequitable access to telehealth capable technology. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess accessibility and satisfaction with telehealth technology by vulnerable patients with cancer and pulmonary disease. METHODOLOGY: A paper survey and internet-based survey were developed and administered to adult (≥18 years) cancer and pulmonary clinic patients (July 1, 2020 to October 30, 2020). RESULTS: Descriptive statistics and Fisher exact test were performed. Two hundred eleven patients completed the survey. Adults ≥50 years old (older) had reduced access to smartphone video capability and internet connection compared with adults less than 50 years old (59% vs. 90%, p < .01). Older adults reported more challenges with telehealth visits compared with younger adults (50.3%, 28.6%; p < .01). No difference in access to technology and preferences for telehealth versus in-person care was found by race, gender, or education level. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all patients (95%) who had a previous experience with a telehealth visit felt confident in the quality of care they received via telehealth. Younger adults preferred video visits compared with older adults (75% vs. 50.6%, p < .01). Older adults were less likely to have access to smartphones with internet access, have more challenges with telehealth visits, and were less likely to prefer audio-video telehealth visits compared with younger adults. IMPLICATIONS: Ensuring equitable access to all health care delivery modalities by telehealth, including audio-only visits for patients across the age continuum, is paramount.

Deconstructing the Way We Use Pulmonary Function Test Race-Based Adjustments.

Race is a social construct. It is used in medical diagnostic algorithms to adjust the readout for spirometry and other diagnostic tests. The authors review historic evidence about the origins of race adjustment in spirometry, and recent attention to the lack of scientific evidence for their continued use. Existing reference values imply that White patients have better lung function than non-White patients. They perpetuate the historical assumptions that human biological functions of the lung should be calculated differently on the basis of racial-skin color without considering the difficulty of using self-identified race. More importantly, they fail to consider the important effects of environmental exposures, socioeconomic differences, health care access, and prenatal factors on lung function. In addition, the use of "race adjustment" implies a White standard to which other non-White values need "adjustment." Because of the spirometric guidelines in place, the current diagnostic prediction adjustment practice may have untoward effects on patients not categorized as "White," including underdiagnosis in asthma and restrictive lung disease, undertreatment with lung transplant, undercompensation in workers compensation cases, and other unintended consequences. Individuals, institutions, national organizations, and policymakers should carefully consider the historic basis, and reconsider the current role of an automated, race-based adjustment in spirometry.

Ecological momentary assessment of outcomes in allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis: A review.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) rely on patient-reported symptoms and quality-of-life measures, which are subject to bias. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) captures data in real time through repeated short surveys, thus reducing errors/biases. EMA's use in sinonasal conditions has not been well described, and the goal of this study was to examine the literature on EMA and AR/CRS.  METHODS: A literature review was performed using the following search terms: AR, CRS, and EMA. Inclusion criteria were the use of EMA reporting of sinonasal symptoms at more than one time point. Systematic reviews and non-full text articles were excluded. Population demographics, sinonasal disease, type of EMA platform used, type and severity of symptoms reported, medication use and symptom correlation with location/pollen/pollution were collected. RESULTS: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, and all focused on AR. All studies were conducted outside the United States in both children and adults. Seven studies used a smartphone application for reporting symptoms, and one used WeChat surveys. EMA data collection varied, with repetitive survey intervals determined either by patients (n = 6) or research team (n = 2). All studies reported sinonasal severity scores, while six reported additional symptoms (e.g., ocular, pulmonary, sleep, general health). Five collected self-reported allergy medication use. Seven studies correlated symptoms with location, pollen, or pollution. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies in AR and no studies in CRS assessed the use of EMA. EMA may provide a better understanding of the real-time relationship of environmental triggers with symptoms, in turn guiding treatment decisions.

Social Determinants of Health in Asthma Through the Life Course.

There is strong evidence supporting the influence of social determinants of health (SDOH) on the development and progression of asthma. SDOH are defined as conditions in which people are born, grow up, live, work, and age, which influence their opportunity to be healthy, risk of illness, and life expectancy. The goal of this article was to describe 2 case-based approaches (pediatric and adult) to assessing and addressing SDOH in asthma across the life course and in community settings. As asthma providers and specialists, the role of SDOH is complex in our clinical care; however, it is critical to address social needs identified through clinical care for our patients with asthma. Clinical-community partnerships, through grant and cost-sharing mechanisms with resource agencies, are necessary to ameliorate social needs for patients and their communities and have the potential to improve asthma outcomes. Although this is a unique and exciting time in health care to promote individual and population health, knowledge gaps remain, including best practices to integrate holistic SDOH care into the care of patients with asthma.