Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 170(4): 1147-1157, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38104319

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate listening effort (LE) in unilateral, bilateral, and bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users. Establish an easy-to-implement task of LE that could be useful for clinical decision making. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary neurotology center. METHODS: The Sentence Final Word Identification and Recall Task, an established measure of LE, was modified to include challenging listening conditions (multitalker babble, gender, and emotional variation; test), in addition to single-talker sentences (control). Participants listened to lists of sentences in each condition and recalled the last word of each sentence. LE was quantified by percentage of words correctly recalled and was compared across conditions, across CI groups, and within subjects (best aided vs monaural). RESULTS: A total of 24 adults between the ages of 37 and 82 years enrolled, including 4 unilateral CI users (CI), 10 bilateral CI users (CICI), and 10 bimodal CI users (CIHA). Task condition impacted LE (P < .001), but hearing configuration and listener group did not (P = .90). Working memory capacity and contralateral hearing contributed to individual performance. CONCLUSION: This study adds to the growing body of literature on LE in challenging listening conditions for CI users and demonstrates feasibility of a simple behavioral task that could be implemented clinically to assess LE. This study also highlights the potential benefits of bimodal hearing and individual hearing and cognitive factors in understanding individual differences in performance, which will be evaluated through further research.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Audífonos , Percepción del Habla , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Esfuerzo de Escucha , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 150(2): 133-141, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38153724

RESUMEN

Importance: As the incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) continues to rise in the US, an increasing number of patients are being treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Readmission following surgery can potentially delay initiation of adjuvant treatment and affect survival outcomes. Objective: To identify risk factors for 30-day postoperative readmission in patients undergoing TORS for OPSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study used data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2017. All patients undergoing TORS for OPSCC were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes and included. Exclusion criteria were age younger than 18 years or incomplete information regarding index admission or readmission. The analysis was performed from April to October 2023. Exposure: TORS for OPSCC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with 30-day readmission. Covariates included demographics and medical comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, hospital characteristics, and surgical details. Trends in readmission over time, reasons for readmission, and characteristics of the readmission were also examined. Results: A weighted total of 5544 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.7 [0.25] years; 4475 [80.7%] male) underwent TORS for OPSCC. The overall readmission rate was 17.5% (n = 971), and these rates decreased over the study period (50 of 211 patients [23.7%] in 2010 vs 58 of 633 patients [9.1%] in 2017). Risk factors associated with readmission included male sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.07-2.20) and a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (AOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.28-4.58). Factors associated with decreased rate of readmission included undergoing concurrent selective neck dissection (AOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.41). Among the 971 readmissions, the most common readmission diagnoses were bleeding (151 [15.6%]), electrolyte and digestive problems (44 [4.5%]), pneumonia (44 [4.5%]), and sepsis (26 [2.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, readmission rates following TORS for oropharynx cancer decreased over time; however, a subset of patients required readmission most commonly related to bleeding, infection, and electrolyte imbalance. Concurrent neck dissection may be protective against readmission. Elucidation of risk factors for readmission after TORS for OPSCC offers opportunities for evidence-based shared decision-making, quality improvement initiatives, and improved patient counseling.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Femenino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello , Readmisión del Paciente , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Electrólitos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA