Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 2024 Jul 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39053730

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accurately predicting postoperative outcomes is fundamental to informed clinical decision-making, and alignment of patient and family expectations. The AMPREDICT Decision Support Tool is a predictive tool designed to assess the probability of mortality 1 year after major and minor amputations. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of AMPREDICT in our Veteran patient population. METHODS: Retrospective review of lower extremity amputations completed at the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs hospital from 2000 to 2020. Staged open amputations and previous minor amputations were excluded. Using the AMPREDICT tool, the probability of mortality 1 year postsurgery for single-stage transfemoral and transtibial amputations was calculated, then compared with observed patient outcomes. Observed to predicted mortality was compared through boxplots, at 1 year after surgery, confidence intervals were calculated, and group means were compared using Student's t-test. Receiver operator curves were constructed to assess discriminatory capacity of the tool. Significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty three patients underwent 650 lower extremity amputations during our study period. Two hundred sixty seven patients underwent single-stage transfemoral or transtibial amputations comprising our study cohort. The average age at amputation was 66 years with an average age of death at 71 years. AMPREDICT tool's prognostic capability varied across the 2 amputations studied. For single-staged transfemoral amputations, prediction aligned closely with observed outcomes, as indicated by a significant P value of 0.0002 (confidence interval 12.73-36.37). For single-stage transtibial amputations, the predictions were also significant, P value 0.0017 (confidence interval 5.25-21.20), although had a wider prediction range. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the reliability of the AMPREDICT tool in predicting 1-year mortality for patients undergoing major lower limb amputations. The predictive accuracy was found to be statistically significant for both single-staged transfemoral and transtibial amputations. These findings suggest that AMPREDICT may be a valuable tool in the clinical setting for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation.

2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 89: 36-42, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36749106

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Veterans are disproportionately affected by housing insecurity (HI), which can lead to adverse health outcomes and reduced life expectancy. We sought to examine the impact of HI on the outcomes of veterans who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair at our regional Veterans Affairs medical center. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent AAA repair at our institution between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2020. We examined medical history, procedure details, hospitalization course, and postoperative outcomes. Primary endpoints were a 30-day mortality and median survival. Secondary endpoints were hospital length of stay, readmission rate, and perioperative complications. Hypothesis testing was performed with t-test and chi-squared analysis. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier estimation. RESULTS: Of the 314 veterans that underwent AAA repair (mean age of 71.4 ± 7.8 years, 99.7% male) over the 21-year period, we identified 39 (12.4%) patients with a history of HI. The HI was associated with a positive smoking history (100% vs. 88.0%, P = 0.022), lower rate of hypertension diagnosis (69.2% vs. 84.0%, P = 0.024), and increased rate of surgical site infections (SSI) (10.3% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.016). The median postoperative survival was lower in the HI group (7.6 years [CI 6.0-11.2] vs. 8.9 [CI 6.9-10.3]). CONCLUSIONS: HI was associated with reduced median postoperative survival, greater readmission rate, and increased risk of SSI following AAA repair.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inestabilidad de Vivienda , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos
3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 92: 18-23, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36690250

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes following surgery and affects at least 3 of every 10 US Veterans aged 65 years and older. We designed a study to characterize the association between frailty and complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared to open aneurysm repair (OAR) at our regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center. METHODS: Veterans who underwent either OAR or EVAR at our institution between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020 were identified. We examined medical history, procedure characteristics, perioperative complications, and frailty as measured by the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5). Frailty was defined as an mFI-5 score ≥2. Primary endpoints were postoperative complications, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. Tests of association were performed with t-test and chi-squared analysis. RESULTS: Over the 21-year period, we identified 314 patients that underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with 115 (36.6%) OAR and 199 EVAR (63.4%) procedures. Patients undergoing EVAR were older on average (72.1 years vs. 70.2 years) and had a higher average mFI-5 compared to the open repair group (1.49 vs. 1.23, P = 0.036). When comparing EVAR and OAR cohorts, patients undergoing OAR had a larger AAA diameter (6.5 cm, standard deviation [SD]: 1.5) compared to EVAR (5.5 cm, SD: 1.1 P < 0.0001). Fewer frail patients underwent OAR (n = 40, 34.8%) compared to EVAR (n = 86, 43.2%), and frail EVAR patients had higher AAA diameter (5.8 cm, SD: 1.0) compared to nonfrail EVAR patients (5.3 cm, SD 1.2), P = 0.003. Among OAR procedures, frail patients had longer operative times (296 min vs. 253 min, P = 0.013) and higher incidence of pneumonia (17.5% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.035). Among frail EVAR patients, operative time and perioperative complications including wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, and pneumonia were not significantly different than their nonfrail counterparts. Overall, frail patients had more early complications (n = 55, 43.7%) as compared to nonfrail patients (n = 48, 25.5%, P = 0.001). OAR patients had higher rates of postoperative complications including wound dehiscence (7.0% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.001), surgical site infections (7.0% vs. 1.0%, P = 0.003), and pneumonia (9.6% vs. 0.5%, P=<0.0001). Open repair was also associated with overall longer average intensive care unit stays (11.0 days vs. 1.6 days, P < 0.0001) and longer average hospitalizations (13.5 days vs. 2.4 days, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that frailty is associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes in open repair compared to EVAR. Patients who underwent open repair had higher rates of wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, and pneumonia, compared to those undergoing endovascular repair. Frailty was associated with larger AAA diameter in the EVAR cohort and longer operative times, with higher frequency of postoperative pneumonia in the OAR cohort. Frailty is a strong risk factor that should be considered in the management of aortic aneurysms.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Fragilidad , Veteranos , Humanos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía
4.
JAMA Surg ; 157(9): e222935, 2022 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35947375

RESUMEN

Importance: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can choose open repair or endovascular repair (EVAR). While EVAR is less invasive, it requires lifelong surveillance and more frequent aneurysm-related reinterventions than open repair. A decision aid may help patients receive their preferred type of AAA repair. Objective: To determine the effect of a decision aid on agreement between patient preference for AAA repair type and the repair type they receive. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cluster randomized trial, 235 patients were randomized at 22 VA vascular surgery clinics. All patients had AAAs greater than 5.0 cm in diameter and were candidates for both open repair and EVAR. Data were collected from August 2017 to December 2020, and data were analyzed from December 2020 to June 2021. Interventions: Presurgical consultation using a decision aid vs usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had agreement between their preference and their repair type, measured using χ2 analyses, κ statistics, and adjusted odds ratios. Results: Of 235 included patients, 234 (99.6%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 73 (5.9) years. A total of 126 patients were enrolled in the decision aid group, and 109 were enrolled in the control group. Within 2 years after enrollment, 192 (81.7%) underwent repair. Patients were similar between the decision aid and control groups by age, sex, aneurysm size, iliac artery involvement, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Patients preferred EVAR over open repair in both groups (96 of 122 [79%] in the decision aid group; 81 of 106 [76%] in the control group; P = .60). Patients in the decision aid group were more likely to receive their preferred repair type than patients in the control group (95% agreement [93 of 98] vs 86% agreement [81 of 94]; P = .03), and κ statistics were higher in the decision aid group (κ = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95) compared with the control group (κ = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.74). Adjusted models confirmed this association (odds ratio of agreement in the decision aid group relative to control group, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.10-7.70). Conclusions and Relevance: Patients exposed to a decision aid were more likely to receive their preferred AAA repair type, suggesting that decision aids can help better align patient preferences and treatments in major cardiovascular procedures. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03115346.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prioridad del Paciente
5.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 87: 311-320, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35810947

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We hypothesize among patients undergoing lower extremity amputation, access to pre-, and post operative rehabilitation services; as well as improved medical care, have led to higher rates of postoperative ambulation, and improved survival. METHODS: Retrospective single center review of all major lower extremity amputations performed at the Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System from 2000-2020 stratified into multiyear cohorts. We abstracted demographics, operative indication, comorbidities, preoperative medical management, perioperative complications, discharge location, and pre and postoperative ambulatory status. Odds of ambulation after amputation were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Survival was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Multivariate logistic predictors were selected based on prior literature and clinical experience. RESULTS: We identified 654 operations in our study, noting fewer amputations performed in the latest 3 cohort years as compared to the initial cohort (2000-2004). Patients undergoing below-knee amputations (BKA) had 2.7 times (P < 0.05) greater odds of postoperative ambulation and 86% (P < 0.05) increased odds of survival compared to above-knee amputations (AKA). The odds of ambulation increased by 8.8% (P < 0.05) for each consecutive study year. Ambulation post-amputation conferred 13.2 times (P < 0.05) greater odds of survival. The odds of survival in "emergent" operations decreased by 48% (P < 0.05) compared to an "elective" operation. For each additional comorbidity, the odds of survival decreased by 18% (P < 0.05). Patients with any perioperative complication had a 48% (P < 0.05) lower odds of survival. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates demonstrated significant survival difference between patients by amputation level and postoperative ambulatory status (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory status following distal amputation has improved over time and is significantly associated with increased survival post-amputation. Patients undergoing a BKA or discharged home were most likely to ambulate postoperatively. Amputation level, preoperative comorbidities, and perioperative complications remain strong predictors of survival.


Asunto(s)
Veteranos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Amputación Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias
6.
J Vasc Surg ; 76(3): 806-813.e1, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35643200

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Most patients with acute Paget-Schroetter syndrome (PSS) present in one of two manners: (1) thrombosis managed initially with thrombolysis and anticoagulation and then referred for surgery, and (2) initial treatment with anticoagulation only and later referral for surgery. Definitive benefits of thrombolysis in the acute period (the first 2 weeks after thrombosis) over anticoagulation alone have not been well reported. Our goal was to compare patients managed with early thrombolysis and anticoagulation followed by first rib resection (FRR) and later postoperative venography with venoplasty (PTA) with those managed with anticoagulation alone followed by FRR and PTA using vein patency assessed with venography and standardized outcome measures. METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively collected database from 2000 to 2019. Two groups were compared: those managed with early thrombolysis at our institution (Lysis) and those managed with anticoagulation alone (NoLysis). All patients underwent FRR. Venography was routinely performed before and after FRR. Standardized outcome measures included Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores and Somatic Pain Scale. RESULTS: A total of 50 Lysis and 50 NoLysis patients were identified. Pre-FRR venography showed that thrombolysis resulted in patency of 98% of veins, whereas 78% of NoLysis veins were patent. After FRR, postoperative venography revealed that 46 (92%) patients in the Lysis group and 37 (74%) patients in the NoLysis group achieved vein patency. Thrombolysis was significantly associated with final vein patency (odds ratio: 17 [4-199]; P < .001). Lysis patients had a trend toward lower QuickDASH scores from pre-FRR to post-FRR compared with NoLysis patients with a mean difference of -16.4 (±19.7) vs -5.2 (±15.6) points (P = .13). The difference in reduction of Somatic Pain Scale scores was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolysis as initial management of PSS, combined with anticoagulation, followed by FFR and VenoPTA resulted in improved final vein patency and may lead to an improved functional outcome measured with QuickDASH scores. Therefore, clinical protocols using thrombolysis as initial management should be considered when planning the optimal treatment strategy for patients with acute PSS.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Nociceptivo , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Dolor Nociceptivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Nociceptivo/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Costillas/diagnóstico por imagen , Costillas/cirugía , Vena Subclavia/cirugía , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/etiología
7.
Am Surg ; 88(10): 2561-2564, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35722888

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Access to surgical service is limited by provider availability and geographic barriers. Telemedicine ensures that patients can access medical care. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to describe our use of telemedicine in delivering vascular surgery services to remote locations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review analyzing care delivered at six vascular surgery telemedicine clinics over a 22-month period. We examined vascular diagnoses, recommended interventions, referrals placed, and emergency department visits within 30 days of evaluation. We calculated travel distance saved for patients between their local clinic and our main hospital. RESULTS: We identified 94 patients and 144 telemedicine visits, with an average of 1.5 visits per patient (SD = 0.73). The most common referrals were for peripheral artery disease (20.2%) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (14.9%). Three patients were immediately referred to the emergency department due to concern for acute limb ischemia (2) or questionable symptomatic AAA (1). Telemedicine visit recommendations were distributed between no intervention (n = 30, 31.9%), medical management (n = 41, 43.6%), and surgical intervention (n = 23, 24.5%).The surgical intervention cohort was most commonly referred to arterial revascularization (n = 4), venous ablation (n = 4), and arteriovenous fistula procedures (n = 4). Fourteen patients came to our main hospital for surgery and four to local providers. Average travel distance saved per telemedicine visit was 104 miles (SD = 43.7). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine provided safe, efficient care during the COVID-19 pandemic and saved patients an average of 104 travel miles per visit.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Telemedicina/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares
8.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 9(5): 1145-1150.e1, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33340730

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Spontaneous subclavian vein (SCV) thrombosis (Paget-Schroetter syndrome [PSS]) has been attributed to venous compression at the thoracic outlet and traditionally diagnosed using venography. Intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) allows for a multidimensional view of vascular structures and might be more accurate in revealing venous compression. The goal of the present study was to compare venography and IVUS in patients presenting with PSS to assess the relative accuracy of each modality. METHODS: Patients presenting for evaluation of PSS from 2013 to 2019 were evaluated for SCV compression using venography and IVUS. Venography and IVUS measurements of stenosis were performed of the index and contralateral limbs in both neutral and stress (arm overhead) positions. The IVUS data included the SCV diameters in the anteroposterior (AP) plane, craniocaudal (CC) plane, and cross-sectional area (CSA). Stenosis was reported as the percentage of reduction from a reference point (lateral margin of the first rib) for the venography and IVUS data. RESULTS: For the 35 subjects, the average age was 35 years, 57% were women, 20% had presented with a documented pulmonary embolus, and 70% had initially been treated with thrombolysis. Venography demonstrated SCV occlusion in 3 patients (16%) with the index limb in the neutral position and in 18 patients (54%) with the limb in the stress position. The average stenosis in the index limbs was 41.5% (venography), and the average IVUS stenosis was 41.9% (CC), 61.8% (AP), and 74.5% (CSA; P < .05). A subset analysis revealed that in 10 of 35 patients (28%) in whom venography had identified no significant stenosis (average, 10%), IVUS had identified significant stenosis (33.5% CC, 54.3% AP, 68.7% CSA; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: IVUS proved more sensitive than venography in detecting significant stenosis leading to SCV thrombosis. A reduction in the CSA was the most sensitive measure of stenosis. IVUS identified significant stenosis in patients in whom venography failed to do so. The greatest utility of IVUS is in the evaluation of patients with PSS in whom venography shows no evident compression.


Asunto(s)
Constricción Patológica/diagnóstico por imagen , Flebografía , Vena Subclavia/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
9.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 48(5): 20180432, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30875245

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Males with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at high risk of ischaemic stroke given that atherogenic risk factors for both diseases are similar. We hypothesized that neurologically asymptomatic males diagnosed with PAD would demonstrate calcified carotid artery plaques (CCAP) on panoramic images (PI) significantly more often than similarly aged males not having PAD. METHODS: Investigators implemented a retrospective cross-sectional study. Subjects were male patients over age 50 diagnosed with PAD by ankle-brachial systolic pressure index results of ≤ 0.9. Controls negative for PAD had an ankle-brachial systolic pressure index > 0.9. Predictor variable was a diagnosis of PAD and outcome variable was presence of CCAP. Prevalence of CCAP amongst the PAD+ patients was compared to prevalence of CCAP among PAD- patients. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed and p-value was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Final sample size consisted of 234 males (mean age 72.68 ± 9.09); 116 subjects and 118 controls. Among the PAD+ cohort, CCAP+ prevalence rate (57.76%) was significantly (p = 0.001) greater than the CCAP+ rate (36.44%) of the PAD- (control). There was no significant difference in atherogenic "risk factors" in the PAD+ cohort between CCAP+ and CCAP- subjects. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that CCAP, a "risk factor" for future stroke and "risk indicator" of future myocardial infarction is seen significantly more often detected on the PIs of older male patients with PAD than among those without. Dentists treating patients with PAD must be uniquely vigilant for the presence of CCAPs on their patients' PI.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas , Estenosis Carotídea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Radiografía Panorámica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Extremidad Inferior , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
10.
J Vasc Surg ; 68(4): 1143-1149, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29705086

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The transaxillary approach to thoracic outlet decompression in the presence of cervical ribs offers the advantage of less manipulation of the brachial plexus and associated nerves. This may result in reduced incidence of perioperative complications, such as nerve injuries. Our objective was to report contemporary data for a series of patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) and cervical ribs managed through a transaxillary approach. METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively maintained database for all consecutive patients who underwent surgery for TOS and who had a cervical rib. Symptoms, preoperative evaluation, surgical details, complications, and postoperative outcomes form the basis of this report. RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2016, there were 818 patients who underwent 1154 procedures for TOS, including 873 rib resections. Of these, 56 patients underwent 70 resections for first and cervical ribs. Cervical ribs were classified according to the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards: 25 class 1, 17 class 2, 5 class 3, and 23 class 4. Presentations included neurogenic TOS in 49 patients and arterial TOS in 7. Operative time averaged 141 minutes, blood loss was 47 mL, and hospital stay averaged 2 days. No injuries to the brachial plexus, long thoracic, or thoracodorsal nerves were identified. One patient had partial phrenic nerve dysfunction that resolved. No hematomas, lymph leak, or early rehospitalizations occurred. Average follow-up was 591 days. Complete resolution or minimal symptoms were noted in 52 (92.8%) patients postoperatively. Significant residual symptoms requiring ongoing evaluation or pain management were noted in four (7.1%) at last follow-up. Somatic pain scores were reduced from 6.9 (preoperatively) to 1.3 (at last visit). Standardized evaluation using shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores indicated improvement from 60.4 (preoperatively) to 31.3 (at last visit). CONCLUSIONS: This series of transaxillary cervical and first rib resections demonstrates excellent clinical outcomes with minimal morbidity. The presence of cervical ribs, a positive response to scalene muscle block, and abnormalities on electrodiagnostic testing are reliable indicators for surgery. A cervical rib in a patient with TOS suggests that there is excellent potential for improvement after first and cervical rib excision.


Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Osteotomía , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Costilla Cervical/anomalías , Costilla Cervical/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/etiología , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
11.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther ; 47(12): 957-964, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28992768

RESUMEN

Synopsis Claudication from peripheral artery disease (PAD) may mimic or coexist with musculoskeletal conditions and represents an important diagnostic consideration in patients over 50 years of age. Physical therapists are optimally positioned to recognize this condition by incorporating a vascular history and physical examination in appropriately selected patients. Recognition of PAD is important both from the standpoint of addressing the ischemic risk to the limb and because PAD is associated with high cerebrovascular and cardiovascular risk. Therefore, multidisciplinary management of patients with PAD is essential. Extensive evidence supports treatment of PAD-related claudication with supervised exercise, and physical therapists are well positioned to play an important role in this treatment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(12):957-964. Epub 9 Oct 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7442.


Asunto(s)
Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Índice Tobillo Braquial , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico por imagen , Claudicación Intermitente/etiología , Extremidad Inferior/fisiopatología , Anamnesis , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/clasificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Examen Físico , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Caminata
12.
Ostomy Wound Manage ; 61(1): 16-29, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25581604

RESUMEN

Current scientific evidence suggests venous leg ulcers (VLUs) that do not respond to guideline-defined care may have a wound microenvironment that is out of physiological balance. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial was conducted to compare percent wound size reduction, proportions healed, pain, and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in patients randomized to standard care (SC) alone or SC and 40 kHz noncontact, low-frequency ultrasound (NLFU) treatments 3 times per week for 4 weeks. One hundred, twelve (112) eligible participants with documented venous stasis, a VLU >30 days' duration, measuring 4 cm2 to 50 cm2, and demonstrated arterial flow were enrolled. Of these, 81 reduced <30% in size during the 2-week run-in study phase and were randomized (SC, n = 40; NLFU+SC, n = 41). Median age of participants was 59 years; 83% had multiple complex comorbidities. Index ulcers were 56% recurrent, with a median duration of 10.3 months (range 1 month to 204.5 months) and median ulcer area of 11.0 cm2 (range 3.7 cm2-41.3 cm2). All participants received protocol-defined SC compression (30-40 mm Hg), dressings to promote a moist wound environment, and sharp debridement at the bedside for a minimum of 1 time per week. Ulcer measurements were obtained weekly using digital planimetry. Pain and QOL scores were assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment using the Visual Analog Scale and the Short Form-36 Health Survey. After 4 weeks of treatment, average wound size reduction was 61.6% ± 28.9 in the NLFU+SC compared to 45% ± 32.5 in the SC group (P = 0.02). Reductions in median (65.7% versus 44.4%, P = 0.02) and absolute wound area (9.0 cm2 versus 4.1 cm2, P = 0.003) as well as pain scores (from 3.0 to 0.6 versus 3.0 to 2.4, P = 0.01) were also significant. NLFU therapy with guideline-defined standard VLU care should be considered for healing VLUs not responding to SC alone. The results of this study warrant further research on barriers to healing and the changes occurring in the tissue of the wound to explore theories that the microenvironment impacts wounds that do not heal despite provision of guideline-defined care.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera de la Pierna/diagnóstico por imagen , Úlcera Varicosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Úlcera de la Pierna/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Ultrasonido/instrumentación , Ultrasonografía
13.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 25(5): 624-9, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21724102

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Thrombosis and embolization are the most frequent complications associated with the vascular presentation of thoracic outlet syndrome (VTOS). Therefore, surgery for these conditions requires careful balancing of anticoagulation and hemostasis. Our goal is to identify the optimal postoperative anticoagulation management of these patients. METHODS: A prospective database of consecutive patients who have presented to our institution with the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome was reviewed from 1996 through 2010 for instances of postoperative hemorrhage. All venous cases were managed with transaxillary first rib resection followed by postoperative venography and percutaneous angioplasty when required. All arterial cases first underwent thrombolysis, then decompression with transaxillary first and cervical rib resection with concomitant arterial repair when indicated. RESULTS: Over the study period, 423 patients diagnosed with thoracic outlet syndrome underwent 551 procedures. Of these, 108 presented with VTOS (12 arterial and 96 venous). Mean age of the patients in the cohort was 33.7 ± 11.5 years, with 53 women and 55 men. Postoperative hemorrhage occurred in four patients (4%): three venous cases and one arterial case. Three patients required tube thoracostomy (average blood return: 800 mL) and two required video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for decortication. Age, gender, preoperative anticoagulation, interval from thrombolysis to surgery, operative duration, and operative blood loss had no effect on the risk of bleeding. No hemorrhage occurred in patients treated with postoperative coumadin alone (82 patients) or with no anticoagulant (24 patients). The four cases of hemorrhage occurred only in patients treated with postoperative low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; 14 patients; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Postoperative hemorrhage was not a common complication of first rib resection for VTOS. In our experience, it occurred exclusively in patients receiving LMWH postoperatively. Postoperative LMWH should be used with caution in patients with VTOS.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/efectos adversos , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Costillas/cirugía , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Los Angeles , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/sangre , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/diagnóstico por imagen , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
14.
J Am Coll Surg ; 212(6): 1018-26, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21441043

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that preoperative coronary revascularization overall does not improve outcomes after noncardiac surgery. It is not known whether this holds true for high-risk patients with a history of recent MI. Our objective was to determine whether preoperative revascularization improves outcomes after noncardiac surgery in patients with a recent MI. STUDY DESIGN: Using the California Patient Discharge Database, we retrospectively analyzed patients with a recent MI who underwent hip surgery, cholecystectomy, bowel resection, elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and lower extremity amputation from 1999 to 2004 (n = 16,478). Postoperative 30-day reinfarction and 30-day and 1-year mortality were compared for patients who underwent preoperative revascularization (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary stenting, or coronary artery bypass graft) and those who were not revascularized using univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using bootstrapping with 1,000 repetitions. RESULTS: Patients with a recent MI who were revascularized before surgery had an approximately 50% decreased rate of reinfarction (5.1% versus 10.0%; p < 0.001) and 30-day (5.2% versus 11.3%; p < 0.001) and 1-year mortality (18.3% versus 35.8%; p < 0.001) compared with those who were not. Stenting within 1 month of surgery was associated with a trend toward increased reinfarction (relative risk: 1.36; 95% CI, 0.96-1.97), and coronary artery bypass graft was associated with a decreased risk (relative risk: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: This large sample representing real world practice suggests that patients with a recent MI can benefit from preoperative revascularization. Coronary artery bypass graft can improve outcomes more than stenting, especially when surgery is necessary within 1 month of revascularization, but additional prospective studies are indicated.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Revascularización Miocárdica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , California/epidemiología , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 24(4): 511-7, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20451794

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2008, the Surgeon General made a Call to Action for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and for the first time, the 2008 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for treatment of acute lower extremity DVT (ALE DVT) were revised to include thrombolysis as a grade 2B recommendation. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) therapy for patients with ALE DVT without contraindications can result in more complete clot dissolution than anticoagulation alone and may prevent the long-term sequelae of DVT. We sought to determine the percentage of inpatients with ALE DVT at a tertiary medical center who were candidates for CDT therapy and whether these patients were appropriately offered such treatment. METHODS: A hospital administrative database search from a tertiary medical center between January 2007 and December 2007 revealed 667 patient admissions associated with a diagnosis of DVT by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes (451-451.99, 453-453.99). Computerized hospital records were then searched for information regarding medical history, comorbidities, contraindications to thrombolysis, symptoms, imaging findings, and treatment. RESULTS: Of the 667 patient admissions, 157 (24%) had ALE DVT, 31% had upper extremity DVT, 17% carried an old diagnosis DVT, and 28% had venous thromboses in other vessels. Of those 157 patients with ALE DVT, 60 (38%) had proximal iliofemoral or extensive femoral DVT that would be candidates for thrombolysis. Of the 60 patients, only 10 (17%) had no major contraindication thrombolysis. Of these, one was offered CDT but refused treatment, four did not receive consults for thrombolysis; five (9%) were offered CDT and were treated. However, of these 60 patients, 50 (83%) patients had severe illness and major and often multiple contraindications to thrombolysis. CONCLUSION: Although the majority of patients identified in the 2007 inpatient database with ALE DVT and an absence of contraindications to thrombolysis were appropriately offered CDT therapy, patients in such a tertiary inpatient setting typically have severe medical comorbidities that precluded the use of thrombolysis. Future studies assessing the expanding role of CDT in patients with ALE DVT should focus on outpatient settings or nontertiary care hospitals, where patients are likely to have fewer contraindications to thrombolytic therapy.


Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Pacientes Internos , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Terapia Trombolítica , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Contraindicaciones , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Los Angeles , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Resultado del Tratamiento , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico
16.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 24(4): 503-10, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20036510

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) represent a rare vascular pathology with an estimated incidence of <1%. Although an endovascular approach is being increasingly used to treat RAAs, we hypothesized that open surgical repair of RAA, specifically via aneurysmectomy with arterial reconstruction (AAR), is a safe, effective treatment, particularly for those with complex aneurysm anatomy. METHODS: A review was performed of all patients with RAA, identified by ICD-9 codes, from January 2003 to December 2008 seen at a tertiary care medical center. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, surgical repair, and outcomes, as well as follow-up care. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients (10 women and 4 men; mean age, 48+/-19 years) were included, representing 15 aneurysms. Ten aneurysms underwent open repair via AAR and five were followed nonoperatively. Mean RAA size was larger for those undergoing repair (2.12 cm vs. 1.62 cm, p=0.037). Seven RAAs were repaired in situ with either patch angioplasty or primary repair; three required ex vivo reconstruction; and none underwent bypass. Average operative time was similar for repair type, with a higher blood loss with ex vivo repair. Median length of stay was 5 days (range, 4 to 14 days). Operative repair had no effect on mean systolic blood pressure or GFR. This repair, however, resulted in lower medication requirement for those with concurrent hypertension (2.7 pre vs. 1.6 post, p=0.03). There was a trend toward shorter time until oral intake for retroperitoneal approach compared with transperitoneal. Mean follow-up time was 11.6 months (range, 3 to 30 months). No incidences of rupture, death, nephrectomy, or renal failure occurred in the operative group. CONCLUSION: In the era of endovascular repairs for RAAs, open repair, specifically via AAR, of RAAs remains a safe treatment with low associated morbidity. RAA repair resulted in a reduction in medications for those with associated hypertension. Open repair of RAAs should be the primary treatment modality for complex RAA, with specific consideration given to those with associated hypertension.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/cirugía , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Hipertensión Renovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Arteria Renal/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Anciano , Aneurisma/complicaciones , Aneurisma/diagnóstico , Aneurisma/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión Renovascular/etiología , Hipertensión Renovascular/fisiopatología , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Renal/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos
17.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 15(7): 1820-7, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18369675

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ampullary cancer is the second most common periampullary cancer, with a resection and survival rate more favorable than that for pancreatic cancer. However, most reports have been conducted at single institutions with small sample sizes, and results may not reflect the practices and outcomes in the community. Our objective was to complete a population-based analysis of patients undergoing resection for ampullary carcinoma and compare it with outcomes in the published literature. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with ampullary cancer reported in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (1988-2003) were collected. Primary outcome was survival (5-year), and secondary outcome was stage at presentation. Comparisons were made with outcomes reported in the literature (resection rate, perioperative mortality, and 5-year survival). RESULTS: Of the 3292 ampullary cancer patients, 1301 (40%) underwent resection. Thirty-seven percent presented with stage I tumors. Perioperative mortality (30 day) was 7.6% after resection, and 5-year survival was 36.8%. Few patients died if they survived at least 5 years. The cancer registry data showed less early stage disease, higher perioperative mortality, and lower 5-year survival compared with published reports. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest population-based analysis of ampullary carcinoma. Resection rates and survival at the national level are lower, in general, compared with cancer center reports, which may have implications for regionalizing these procedures. Many patients surviving at least 5 years seem to be cured by surgical resection.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Ampolla Hepatopancreática/cirugía , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Ampolla Hepatopancreática/patología , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 22(2): 183-9, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16845516

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most literature available on rare colorectal cancer (CRC) is from case series reports. This population-based evaluation is the first comprehensive look at four rare histologic types of CRC, allowing comparisons with the more common adenocarcinoma for clinical and pathological features and survival rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with carcinoid (n=2,565), malignant lymphoma (n=955), non-carcinoid neuroendocrine (n=455), squamous cell (n=437), and adenocarcinoma (n=164,638) in SEER cancer database (1991-2000) were analyzed. Evaluation of age-adjusted incidence rate, stage at presentation, and 5-year relative survival were determined for each histologic subtype. RESULTS: All rare histologic subtypes had younger mean age than adenocarcinomas (70 years; p<0.05). Lymphoma was more common in males (65.1%; P<0.01). Incidence rates in 2000 per million were: carcinoid 10.6, lymphoma 3.5, neuroendocrine 2.0, squamous 1.9, and adenocarcinoma 496.3. The annual percent change in incidence for each rare tumor increased significantly during the 10 years (range: 3.1-9.4%, p<0.05), except squamous cell carcinoma (5.9%, p>0.05). Squamous (93.4%) and carcinoid (73.7%) tumors occurred more often in the rectum; lymphoma (79.0%), neuroendocrine (70.8%), and adenocarcinoma (70.1%) occurred more often in the colon (P<0.01). Carcinoids presented at earlier stage (localized/regional, 90.5%) more often than adenocarcinoma (80.6%; p<0.01), but squamous cell (82.1%; p=0.50), lymphoma(70.6%; p<0.01), and neuroendocrine (37.8%; p<0.01) presented at earlier stage similarly or less often than adenocarcinoma. Relative 5-year survival rate was highest for carcinoid (91.3%), and lowest for neuroendocrine tumors (21.4%). CONCLUSION: This study provides the first population-based analysis of the epidemiology, tumor characteristics, and survival rates for rare CRC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Recto/epidemiología , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tumor Carcinoide/epidemiología , Tumor Carcinoide/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma/epidemiología , Linfoma/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/epidemiología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am ; 15(1): 21-37, 2006 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16389148

RESUMEN

The causes of colorectal carcinoma are multifactorial. Numerous lines of epidemiologic evidence support the role of dietary factors, with strong associations revealed for folate and calcium, more equivocal evidence exists for dietary antioxidants. Lifestyle factors such as physical activity, alcohol in-take, and tobacco use are also positively correlated with the risk of colorectal carcinoma. Health services research examines epidemiologic issues,clinical evidence regarding prevention and treatment, patient preferences,and other factors with the goal of improving the quality of care. Observations based on epidemiologic studies and health services research will in the future provide the basis for reducing personal and social burdens caused by colorectal carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 48(12): 2264-71, 2005 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16258711

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A comprehensive analysis was performed for five histologic types of appendiceal tumors to compare incidence, clinicopathologic features, survival, and appropriateness of surgery. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 951), adenocarcinoma (n = 646), carcinoid (n = 435), goblet (n = 369), and signet-ring cell (n = 113) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1973-2001) were analyzed. Evaluation of incidence, stage, and five-year relative survival were determined for each histology. The appropriateness of the operative procedure (i.e. , appendectomy vs. colectomy) was examined by tumor type and size. RESULTS: Tumor incidence, patient demographics, survival outcomes, and appropriateness of surgery varied significantly among the different appendiceal tumor histologies. The most common appendiceal tumors were mucinous. With regard to patient demographics, carcinoids presented at an earlier mean age of 41 years and 71 percent were female (P < 0.001 for both). Overall five-year survival was highest for carcinoid (83 percent) and lowest for signet ring (18 percent). Although current guidelines specify that a right hemicolectomy (rather than an appendectomy) be performed for all noncarcinoid tumors and carcinoid tumors >2 cm, we found that 30 percent of noncarcinoids underwent appendectomy. Similarly, 28 percent of carcinoids >2 cm under-went appendectomy, which is a lesser resection than is indicated. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a population-based analysis of epidemiology, tumor characteristics, survival, and quality of care for appendiceal carcinomas. This characterization provides a novel description of the presentation and outcomes for malignancies of the appendix and highlights that a substantial number of patients with appendiceal tumors may not be receiving appropriate surgical resection.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patología , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Tumor Carcinoide/patología , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/patología , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirugía , Anciano , Neoplasias del Apéndice/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Apéndice/cirugía , Tumor Carcinoide/epidemiología , Tumor Carcinoide/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA