The IRELAnD study-investigating the role of early low-dose aspirin in diabetes mellitus: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Although aspirin therapy is being increasingly advocated with the intention of risk modification for a wide range of pregnancy complications, women with prepregnancy diabetes mellitus are commonly excluded from clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to examine the effect of aspirin therapy on a composite measure of adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial was conducted at 6 university-affiliated perinatology centers. Women with type 1 diabetes mellitus or type 2 diabetes mellitus of at least 6 months' duration were randomly allocated to 150-mg daily aspirin or placebo from 11 to 14 weeks' gestation until 36 weeks. Established vascular complications of diabetes mellitus, including chronic hypertension or nephropathy, led to exclusion from the trial. The primary outcome was a composite measure of placental dysfunction (preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth <34 weeks' gestation, or perinatal mortality). The planned sample size was 566 participants to achieve a 35% reduction in the primary outcome, assuming 80% statistical power. Secondary end points included maternal and neonatal outcomes and determination of insulin requirements across gestation. Data were centrally managed using ClinInfo and analyzed using SAS 9.4. The 2 treatment groups were compared using t tests or chi-square tests, as required, and longitudinal data were compared using a repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS: From February 2020 to September 2022, 191 patients were deemed eligible, 134 of whom were enrolled (67 randomized to aspirin and 67 to placebo) with a retrospective power of 64%. A total of 101 (80%) women had type 1 diabetes mellitus and 25 (20%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus. Reaching the target sample size was limited by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Baseline characteristics were similar between the aspirin and placebo groups. Treatment compliance was very high and similar between groups (97% for aspirin, 94% for placebo). The risk of the composite measure of placental dysfunction did not differ between groups (25% aspirin vs 21% placebo; P=.796). Women in the aspirin group had significantly lower insulin requirements throughout pregnancy compared with the placebo group. Insulin requirements in the aspirin group increased on average from 0.7 units/kg at baseline to 1.1 units/kg by 36 weeks' gestation (an average 83% within-patient increase), and increased from 0.7 units/kg to 1.3 units/kg (a 181% within-patient increase) in the placebo group, over the same gestational period (P=.002). Serial hemoglobin A1c levels were lower in the aspirin group than in the placebo group, although this trend did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial, aspirin did not reduce the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by prepregnancy diabetes mellitus. Compared with the placebo group, aspirin-treated patients required significantly less insulin throughout pregnancy, indicating a beneficial effect of aspirin on glycemic control. Aspirin may exert a plausible placenta-mediated effect on pregestational diabetes mellitus that is not limited to its antithrombotic properties.

Aspirin for evidence-based preeclampsia prevention trial: effects of aspirin on maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor trajectories in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The exact mechanism by which aspirin prevents preeclampsia remains unclear. Its effects on serum placental biomarkers throughout pregnancy are also unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of aspirin on serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor trajectories using repeated measures from women at increased risk of preterm preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: This was a longitudinal secondary analysis of the Combined Multimarker Screening and Randomized Patient Treatment with Aspirin for Evidence-based Preeclampsia Prevention trial using repeated measures of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor. In the trial, 1620 women at increased risk of preterm preeclampsia were identified using the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm at 11 to 13+6 weeks of gestation, of whom 798 were randomly assigned to receive aspirin 150 mg and 822 to receive placebo daily from before 14 weeks to 36 weeks of gestation. Serum biomarkers were measured at baseline and follow-up visits at 19 to 24, 32 to 34, and 36 weeks of gestation. Generalized additive mixed models with treatment by gestational age interaction terms were used to investigate the effect of aspirin on biomarker trajectories over time. RESULTS: Overall, there were 5507 pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and 5523 placental growth factor measurements. Raw pregnancy-associated plasma protein A values increased over time, and raw placental growth factor increased until 32 weeks of gestation followed by a decline. The multiple of the median mean values of the same biomarkers were consistently below 1.0 multiple of the median, reflecting the high-risk profile of the study population. Trajectories of mean pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor multiple of the median values did not differ significantly between the aspirin and placebo groups (aspirin treatment by gestational age interaction P values: .259 and .335, respectively). CONCLUSION: In women at increased risk of preterm preeclampsia, aspirin 150 mg daily had no significant effects on pregnancy-associated plasma protein A or placental growth factor trajectories when compared to placebo.

Preterm Birth: Screening and Prediction.

Preterm birth (PTB) affects approximately 10% of births globally each year and is the most significant direct cause of neonatal death and of long-term disability worldwide. Early identification of women at high risk of PTB is important, given the availability of evidence-based, effective screening modalities, which facilitate decision-making on preventative strategies, particularly transvaginal sonographic cervical length (CL) measurement. There is growing evidence that combining CL with quantitative fetal fibronectin (qfFN) and maternal risk factors in the extensively peer-reviewed and validated QUanititative Innovation in Predicting Preterm birth (QUiPP) application can aid both the triage of patients who present as emergencies with symptoms of preterm labor and high-risk asymptomatic women attending PTB surveillance clinics. The QUiPP app risk of delivery thus supports shared decision-making with patients on the need for increased outpatient surveillance, in-patient treatment for preterm labor or simply reassurance for those unlikely to deliver preterm. Effective triage of patients at preterm gestations is an obstetric clinical priority as correctly timed administration of antenatal corticosteroids will maximise their neonatal benefits. This review explores the predictive capacity of existing predictive tests for PTB in both singleton and multiple pregnancies, including the QUiPP app v.2. and discusses promising new research areas, which aim to predict PTB through cervical stiffness and elastography measurements, metabolomics, extracellular vesicles and artificial intelligence.

Psychological Impact and Women's Evaluation of the First-Trimester Pre-Eclampsia Screening and Prevention: ASPRE Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to extend the understanding of the psychological impact of the first-trimester pre-eclampsia (PE) screening on women identified as high risk for preterm PE. We examined the differences between low- vs. high-risk women throughout pregnancy in: symptoms of distress (anxiety, depression, physical and mental health, and worry), health behaviour changes, the experience of pregnancy, and attitudes towards PE screening. METHODS: This study was nested within the ASPRE trial. Pregnant women were screened for preterm-PE risk status in the first trimester; the assessments were carried out before the screening, in the second and in the third trimester (n = 155 low-risk women and N = 82 high-risk women in the second trimester). RESULTS: The high-risk-for-PE women exhibited more depressive symptoms compared to the low-risk women in the second but not in the third trimester. No differences were observed between the two groups in other distress symptoms or in the women's evaluation of their experience of pregnancy. The high-risk group reported greater health behaviour changes compared to the low-risk group, but this was moderated by depression levels. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, pregnant women reported positive attitudes towards first-trimester PE screening, despite transient depressive symptoms. This study offers supportive evidence concerning the appropriateness of PE screening in ethical terms.

Perspectives on the Use of Placental Growth Factor (PlGF) in the Prediction and Diagnosis of Pre-Eclampsia: Recent Insights and Future Steps.

Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a complex multisystem disease of pregnancy that is becoming increasingly recognized as a state of angiogenic imbalance characterized by low concentrations of placental growth factor (PlGF) and elevated soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase (sFlt-1). PlGF is a protein highly expressed by the placenta with vasculogenic and angiogenic properties, which has a central role in spiral artery remodeling and the development of a low-resistance placental capillary network. PlGF concentrations are significantly lower in women with preterm PE, and these reduced levels have been shown to precede the clinical onset of disease. Subsequently, the clinical utility of maternal serum PlGF has been extensively studied in singleton gestations from as early as 11 to 13 weeks' gestation, utilizing a validated multimarker prediction model, which performs superiorly to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines in the detection of preterm PE. There is extensive research highlighting the role of PlGF-based testing utilizing commercially available assays in accelerating the diagnosis of PE in symptomatic women over 20 weeks' gestation and predicting time-to-delivery, allowing individualized risk stratification and appropriate antenatal surveillance to be determined. "Real-world" data has shown that interpretation of PlGF-based test results can aid clinicians in improving maternal outcomes and a growing body of evidence has implied a role for sFlt-1/PlGF in the prognostication of adverse pregnancy and perinatal events. Subsequently, PlGF-based testing is increasingly being implemented into obstetric practice and is advocated by NICE. This literature review aims to provide healthcare professionals with an understanding of the role of angiogenic biomarkers in PE and discuss the evidence for PlGF-based screening and triage. Prospective studies are warranted to explore if its implementation significantly improves perinatal outcomes, explore the value of repeat PlGF testing, and its use in multiple pregnancies.

Serum PlGF compared with PAPP-A in first trimester screening for preterm pre-eclampsia: Adjusting for the effect of aspirin treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive performance for preterm-pre-eclampsia (PE) in first-trimester screening by serum placental growth factor (PlGF) versus pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), in combination with maternal risk factors, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), after adjustment for the effect of aspirin in women receiving this treatment. DESIGN: Non-intervention multicentre screening studies for PE in singleton pregnancies. SETTING: Maternity hospitals. POPULATION: Two independent prospective studies of 8775 and 16 451 women with singleton pregnancies attending for routine assessment at 11+0 -13+6 weeks' gestation. METHODS: The competing risks model was used to estimate patient-specific risks of delivery with PE at <37 weeks' gestation based on maternal risk factors and combinations with MAP, UtA-PI and either PlGF or PAPP-A. McNemar's test was used to compare the detection rate (DR) of preterm-PE of screening utilising PlGF versus PAPP-A, after adjustments for the effects of aspirin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Predictive performance for preterm-PE. RESULTS: In the combined data of 25 226 women, including 678 (2.7%) who developed PE, there were 194(0.8%) with preterm-PE. Addition of PlGF improved the DR of preterm-PE, at 10% screen positive rate, by 18.4% (95% CI 12.2-24.6) in screening by maternal risk factors, by 19.9% (95% CI 13.6-26.2) in screening by maternal factors and MAP, and by 7.0% (95% CI 2.3-11.6) in screening by maternal factors, MAP and UtA-PI. PAPP-A did not significantly improve the DR provided by any combination of biomarkers. CONCLUSION: The predictive performance of first trimester PlGF for preterm-PE is superior to that of PAPP-A.

Early vaginal progesterone versus placebo in twin pregnancies for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a randomized, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: In women with a singleton pregnancy and sonographic short cervix in midgestation, vaginal administration of progesterone reduces the risk of early preterm birth and improves neonatal outcomes without any demonstrable deleterious effects on childhood neurodevelopment. In women with twin pregnancies, the rate of spontaneous early preterm birth is 10 times higher than that in singletons, and in this respect, all twins are at an increased risk of preterm birth. However, 6 trials in unselected twin pregnancies reported that vaginal administration of progesterone from midgestation had no significant effect on the incidence of early preterm birth. Such apparent lack of effectiveness of progesterone in twins may be due to inadequate dosage or treatment that is started too late in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: The early vaginal progesterone for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth in twins, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, was designed to test the hypothesis that among women with twin pregnancies, vaginal progesterone at a dose of 600 mg per day from 11 to 14 until 34 weeks' gestation, as compared with placebo, would result in a significant reduction in the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth between 24+0 and 33+6 weeks. STUDY DESIGN: The trial was conducted at 22 hospitals in England, Spain, Bulgaria, Italy, Belgium, and France. Women were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either progesterone or placebo, and in the random-sequence generation, there was stratification according to the participating center. The primary outcome was spontaneous birth between 24+0 and 33+6 weeks' gestation. Statistical analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the significance of difference in the incidence of spontaneous birth between 24+0 and 33+6 weeks' gestation between the progesterone and placebo groups, adjusting for the effect of participating center, chorionicity, parity, and method of conception. Prespecified tests of treatment interaction effects with chorionicity, parity, method of conception, compliance, and cervical length at recruitment were performed. A post hoc analysis using mixed-effects Cox regression was used for further exploration of the effect of progesterone on preterm birth. RESULTS: We recruited 1194 women between May 2017 and April 2019; 21 withdrew consent and 4 were lost to follow-up, which left 582 in the progesterone group and 587 in the placebo group. Adherence was good, with reported intake of ≥80% of the required number of capsules in 81.4% of the participants. After excluding births before 24 weeks and indicated deliveries before 34 weeks, spontaneous birth between 24+0 and 33+6 weeks occurred in 10.4% (56/541) of participants in the progesterone group and in 8.2% (44/538) in the placebo group (odds ratio in the progesterone group, adjusting for the effect of participating center, chorionicity, parity, and method of conception, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.05; P=.17). There was no evidence of interaction between the effects of treatment and chorionicity (P=.28), parity (P=.35), method of conception (P=.56), and adherence (P=.34); however, there was weak evidence of an interaction with cervical length (P=.08) suggestive of harm to those with a cervical length of ≥30 mm (odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.59) and potential benefit for those with a cervical length of <30 mm (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-1.60). There was no evidence of difference between the 2 treatment groups for stillbirth or neonatal death, neonatal complications, neonatal therapy, and poor fetal growth. In the progesterone group, 1.4% (8/582) of women and 1.9% (22/1164) of fetuses experienced at least 1 serious adverse event; the respective numbers for the placebo group were 1.2% (7/587) and 3.2% (37/1174) (P=.80 and P=.06, respectively). In the post hoc time-to-event analysis, miscarriage or spontaneous preterm birth between randomization and 31+6 weeks' gestation was reduced in the progesterone group relative to the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.69). CONCLUSION: In women with twin pregnancies, universal treatment with vaginal progesterone did not reduce the incidence of spontaneous birth between 24+0 and 33+6 weeks' gestation. Post hoc time-to-event analysis led to the suggestion that progesterone may reduce the risk of spontaneous birth before 32 weeks' gestation in women with a cervical length of <30 mm, and it may increase the risk for those with a cervical length of ≥30 mm.

Reasons for accepting or declining participation in the ASPRE trial: A qualitative study with women at high risk of preterm pre-eclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that affected the decision of pregnant women at high risk for pre-eclampsia (PE) in accepting or declining participation in a medicated clinical trial (ASPRE) for the prevention of preterm PE. METHOD: This was a qualitative, cross-sectional study. A purposive sample of 14 participants and 13 decliners of the ASPRE trial were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using template analysis. RESULTS: For participants, their high-risk status seems to have motivated them to take part in the trial. This was enabled by their perception that the trial drug aspirin was commonly used, the safety of the procedure, and the belief that they will be in receipt of extra monitoring in pregnancy. Decliners expressed discomfort about taking medications in pregnancy, and about the presence of the placebo arm; they seemed to be motivated by desire to reduce harm. Satisfaction with the information provided by the medical professionals was also influential in women's decision making, and so were the views of their partners and other trusted individuals. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women's motivation to take part or to decline participation in a medicated trail can be understood as an attempt to cope with the threat posed by their high-risk status.

Fetal MRI findings in a retrospective cohort of 26 cases of prenatally diagnosed CHARGE syndrome individuals.

"CHARGE syndrome" (CS) is a multifaceted syndrome associated with a poor prognosis. The prenatal diagnosis remains challenging especially as the fetal anomalies that may evoke suspicion of CS are not comprehensively described. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the anomalies in MRI with suspected CHARGE syndrome and to propose a possible standardization in the image-based prenatal diagnosis of CS. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 26 fetuses who underwent MRI and had a confirmed diagnosis of CS, as proven by histopathological and/or neonatal examinations and/or the presence of the CHD7 gene mutation. RESULTS: The three most frequent MRI anomalies confirmed at histopathological and/or neonatal examinations were arhinencephaly in 100% (26 of 26), dysplasia of the semicircular canals agenesis (SCA) in 100% (24 of 24), and posterior fossa anomalies in 100% (22 of 22). Our study also revealed short petrous bones with a particular triangular shape in 24 of 24 cases of SCA. Other relevant findings included external ear anomalies in 36% (9 of 25), cleft lip and palate (9 of 9), ventriculomegaly (VMG) (6 of 6), short corpus callosum (3 of 3), and ocular asymmetry in 36.6% (4 of 11). CONCLUSION: Our study emphasizes the interest of fetal MRI in the diagnosis of CS with an adapted knowledge of semiology.

Predictive performance of the competing risk model in screening for preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: The established method of screening for preeclampsia is to identify risk factors from maternal demographic characteristics and medical history; in the presence of such factors the patient is classified as high risk and in their absence as low risk. However, the performance of such an approach is poor. We developed a competing risks model, which allows combination of maternal factors (age, weight, height, race, parity, personal and family history of preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, systemic lupus erythematosus or antiphospholipid syndrome, method of conception and interpregnancy interval), with biomarkers to estimate the individual patient-specific risks of preeclampsia requiring delivery before any specified gestation. The performance of this approach is by far superior to that of the risk scoring systems. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine the predictive performance of the competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by a combination of maternal factors, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and serum placental growth factor, referred to as the triple test, in a training data set for the development of the model and 2 validation studies. STUDY DESIGN: The data for this study were derived from 3 previously reported prospective, nonintervention, multicenter screening studies for preeclampsia in singleton pregnancies at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks' gestation. In all 3 studies, there was recording of maternal factors and biomarkers and ascertainment of outcome by appropriately trained personnel. The first study of 35,948 women, which was carried out between February 2010 and July 2014, was used to develop the competing risks model for prediction of preeclampsia and is therefore considered to be the training set. The 2 validation studies were comprised of 8775 and 16,451 women, respectively, and they were carried out between February and September 2015 and between April and December 2016, respectively. Patient-specific risks of delivery with preeclampsia at <34, <37, and <41+3 weeks' gestation were calculated using the competing risks model and the performance of screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors alone and the triple test in each of the 3 data sets was assessed. We examined the predictive performance of the model by first, the ability of the model to discriminate between the preeclampsia and no-preeclampsia groups using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the detection rate at fixed screen-positive rate of 10%, and second, calibration by measurements of calibration slope and calibration in the large. RESULTS: The detection rate at the screen-positive rate of 10% of early-preeclampsia, preterm-preeclampsia, and all-preeclampsia was about 90%, 75%, and 50%, respectively, and the results were consistent between the training and 2 validation data sets. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was >0.95, >0.90, and >0.80, respectively, demonstrating a very high discrimination between affected and unaffected pregnancies. Similarly, the calibration slopes were very close to 1.0, demonstrating a good agreement between the predicted risks and observed incidence of preeclampsia. In the prediction of early-preeclampsia and preterm-preeclampsia, the observed incidence in the training set and 1 of the validation data sets was consistent with the predicted one. In the other validation data set, which was specifically designed for evaluation of the model, the incidence was higher than predicted, presumably because of better ascertainment of outcome. The incidence of all-preeclampsia was lower than predicted in all 3 data sets because at term many pregnancies deliver for reasons other than preeclampsia, and therefore, pregnancies considered to be at high risk for preeclampsia that deliver for other reasons before they develop preeclampsia can be wrongly considered to be false positives. CONCLUSION: The competing risks model provides an effective and reproducible method for first-trimester prediction of early preeclampsia and preterm preeclampsia as long as the various components of screening are carried out by appropriately trained and audited practitioners. Early prediction of preterm preeclampsia is beneficial because treatment of the high-risk group with aspirin is highly effective in the prevention of the disease.

Effect of Cell-Free DNA Screening vs Direct Invasive Diagnosis on Miscarriage Rates in Women With Pregnancies at High Risk of Trisomy 21: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) tests are increasingly being offered to women in the first trimester of pregnancies at a high risk of trisomy 21 to decrease the number of required invasive fetal karyotyping procedures and their associated miscarriages. The effect of this strategy has not been evaluated. Objective: To compare the rates of miscarriage following invasive procedures only in the case of positive cfDNA test results vs immediate invasive testing procedures (amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling) in women with pregnancies at high risk of trisomy 21 as identified by first-trimester combined screening. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted from April 8, 2014, to April 7, 2016, in 57 centers in France among 2111 women with pregnancies with a risk of trisomy 21 between 1 in 5 and 1 in 250 following combined first-trimester screening. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either cfDNA testing followed by invasive testing procedures only when cfDNA tests results were positive (n = 1034) or to receive immediate invasive testing procedures (n = 1017). The cfDNA testing was performed using an in-house validated method based on next-generation sequencing. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was number of miscarriages before 24 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes included cfDNA testing detection rate for trisomy 21. The primary outcome underwent 1-sided testing; secondary outcomes underwent 2-sided testing. Results: Among 2051 women who were randomized and analyzed (mean age, 36.3 [SD, 5.0] years), 1997 (97.4%) completed the trial. The miscarriage rate was not significantly different between groups at 8 (0.8%) vs 8 (0.8%), for a risk difference of -0.03% (1-sided 95% CI, -0.68% to ∞; P = .47). The cfDNA detection rate for trisomy 21 was 100% (95% CI, 87.2%-100%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among women with pregnancies at high risk of trisomy 21, offering cfDNA screening, followed by invasive testing if cfDNA test results were positive, compared with invasive testing procedures alone, did not result in a significant reduction in miscarriage before 24 weeks. The study may have been underpowered to detect clinically important differences in miscarriage rates. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02127515.

Fetal biometry to assess the size and growth of the fetus.

Ultrasound assessment of fetal size is central to modern practice of prenatal care. It facilitates accurate pregnancy dating and screening for fetal growth disorders. This article discusses evidence-based recommended methods for pregnancy dating and biometric measurements. We address some confusing terms such as fetal growth "standards" and fetal growth "references" along with explaining the differences between prescriptive and descriptive charts and between growth charts based on estimated fetal weight vs those based on birth weight. Opinions remain divided on which charts are best to use; however, since the publication of the Intergrowth 21st study, we are now in a position to be able to assess growth and development in an internationally standardized fashion, from fetal life up to 5 years of age. A universal quality control policy can help maintain the high standard of ultrasonography required to achieve an acceptable level of diagnostic accuracy for fetal growth disorders.

Fetal MRI compared with ultrasound for the diagnosis of obstructive genital malformations.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) to diagnose and characterize congenital obstructive genital abnormalities. METHOD: Retrospective cohort of 20 fetuses who underwent a fetal MRI following a US diagnosis of obstructive urogenital malformation. We compared MRI and US findings and their correlation with the definitive diagnosis. RESULT: The correct diagnosis was obtained in 6/20 (30%) cases and 19/20 cases (95%) with US and MRI, respectively. MRI revealed additional information to US in 15/20 cases (75%) and modified the prenatal management in 14 fetuses (70%). The identification rates of the most important anatomical landmarks for the diagnosis, using US and MRI, were compared. Bladder: US 17/20 (85%) vs MRI 20/20 (100%) P = 0.23; vagina: US 6/19 (31.5%) vs MRI 19/19 (100%) P < 10-4 ; uterus: US 11/19 (57.8%) vs MRI 19/19 (100%) P = 0.003, kidneys: US: 40/40 (100%) MRI: 40/40 (100%) P = 1, ureters: US 14/40 (35%) vs MRI 30/40 (75%) P=0.001, rectum: US 6/20 (30%) MRI 20/20 (100%) P < 10-4 , and sacrum: US 20/20 (100%) vs MRI 17/20 (85%) P = 0.23. CONCLUSION: In fetuses with obstructive urogenital malformations, MRI facilitates assessment of major pelvic organs and provides significant information that may alter the prenatal management.

Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Preterm preeclampsia is an important cause of maternal and perinatal death and complications. It is uncertain whether the intake of low-dose aspirin during pregnancy reduces the risk of preterm preeclampsia. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 1776 women with singleton pregnancies who were at high risk for preterm preeclampsia to receive aspirin, at a dose of 150 mg per day, or placebo from 11 to 14 weeks of gestation until 36 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was delivery with preeclampsia before 37 weeks of gestation. The analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: A total of 152 women withdrew consent during the trial, and 4 were lost to follow up, which left 798 participants in the aspirin group and 822 in the placebo group. Preterm preeclampsia occurred in 13 participants (1.6%) in the aspirin group, as compared with 35 (4.3%) in the placebo group (odds ratio in the aspirin group, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.74; P=0.004). Results were materially unchanged in a sensitivity analysis that took into account participants who had withdrawn or were lost to follow-up. Adherence was good, with a reported intake of 85% or more of the required number of tablets in 79.9% of the participants. There were no significant between-group differences in the incidence of neonatal adverse outcomes or other adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with low-dose aspirin in women at high risk for preterm preeclampsia resulted in a lower incidence of this diagnosis than placebo. (Funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Program and the Fetal Medicine Foundation; EudraCT number, 2013-003778-29 ; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN13633058 .).

Study protocol for the randomised controlled trial: combined multimarker screening and randomised patient treatment with ASpirin for evidence-based PREeclampsia prevention (ASPRE).

INTRODUCTION: Pre-eclampsia (PE) affects 2-3% of all pregnancies and is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic use of low-dose aspirin in women at risk for PE may substantially reduce the prevalence of the disease. Effective screening for PE requiring delivery before 37 weeks (preterm PE) can be provided by a combination of maternal factors, uterine artery Doppler, mean arterial pressure, maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor at 11-13 weeks' gestation, with a detection rate of 75% at a false-positive rate of 10%. We present a protocol (V.6, date 25 January 2016) for the ASpirin for evidence-based PREeclampsia prevention (ASPRE) trial, which is a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trial (RCT) that uses an effective PE screening programme to determine whether low-dose aspirin given to women from 11 to 13 weeks' gestation will reduce the incidence of preterm PE. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All eligible women attending for their first trimester scan will be invited to participate in the screening study for preterm PE. Those found to be at high risk of developing preterm PE will be invited to participate in the RCT. Further scans will be conducted for assessment of fetal growth and biomarkers. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes will be collected and analysed. The first enrolment for the pilot study was in April 2014. As of April 2016, 26 670 women have been screened and 1760 recruited to the RCT. The study is registered on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13633058.

Implementation of foetal fibronectin testing: Admissions, maternal interventions and costs at 1 year.

Foetal fibronectin testing (fFN) has a high negative predictive value for preterm delivery, but it has a cost implication. This two-stage prospective study evaluated the real patient costs and clinical impact of introducing the fFN test in women presenting acutely with threatened preterm labour in a tertiary UK obstetric hospital. Introduction of the fFN test for women with threatened preterm labour reduced antenatal admissions and in utero transfers, and reduced steroid treatment and tocolysis, even at 1 year after implementation. The total number of bed days for women with threatened preterm labour who did not deliver during admission fell from 132 (mean 8.8 days) to 25 days (mean 3.6 days). The mean cost of admission per woman before introduction of the fFN test was £1032 (95% CI £880 to £1184); after it was £339 (95% CI £261 to £417). In this small single centre study, the introduction of the test produced a cost saving of £693 per woman (95% CI, £464 to £922) which over 12 months potentially saves £74844 (95% CI £50,112 to £99,576). Further studies are needed to formally evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the fFN test and its impact on clinical decision-making in large populations.

The use of ultrasound and other markers for early detection of preeclampsia.

Preeclampsia (PE) is a multisystem disorder of pregnancy classically characterized with the onset of hypertension after 20 weeks gestation in the presence of proteinuria. PE typically affects 2-8% of pregnancies and is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. This article reviews the most effective biomarkers used in first trimester screening for PE. It explores their use both in isolation and as part of an algorithm to yield the best detection rates. Screening by a combination of maternal risk factors, uterine artery Doppler, mean arterial pressure, maternal serum PAPP-A and PlGF can identify about 75% of cases of preterm PE for a false-positive rate of 10%. By identifying these patients at high risk for PE, appropriately tailored antenatal surveillance can be instigated and prophylactic pharmacological interventions can be prescribed to improve placentation and ultimately, the outcome for both the mother and fetus.

Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks gestation.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia affects approximately 3% of all pregnancies and is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and death. In the last decade, extensive research has been devoted to early screening for preeclampsia with the aim of reducing the prevalence of the disease through pharmacologic intervention in the high-risk group starting from the first trimester of pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a model for preeclampsia based on maternal demographic characteristics and medical history (maternal factors) and biomarkers. STUDY DESIGN: The data for this study were derived from prospective screening for adverse obstetric outcomes in women who attended for their routine first hospital visit at 11-13 weeks gestation in 2 maternity hospitals in England. We screened 35,948 singleton pregnancies that included 1058 pregnancies (2.9%) that experienced preeclampsia. Bayes theorem was used to combine the a priori risk from maternal factors with various combinations of uterine artery pulsatility index, mean arterial pressure, serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, and placental growth factor multiple of the median values. Five-fold cross validation was used to assess the performance of screening for preeclampsia that delivered at <37 weeks gestation (preterm-preeclampsia) and ≥37 weeks gestation (term-preeclampsia) by models that combined maternal factors with individual biomarkers and their combination with screening by maternal factors alone. RESULTS: In pregnancies that experienced preeclampsia, the values of uterine artery pulsatility index and mean arterial pressure were increased, and the values of serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and placental growth factor were decreased. For all biomarkers, the deviation from normal was greater for early than late preeclampsia; therefore, the performance of screening was related inversely to the gestational age at which delivery became necessary for maternal and/or fetal indications. Combined screening by maternal factors, uterine artery pulsatility index, mean arterial pressure, and placental growth factor predicted 75% (95% confidence interval, 70-80%) of preterm-preeclampsia and 47% (95% confidence interval, 44-51%) of term-preeclampsia, at a false-positive rate of 10%; inclusion of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A did not improve the performance of screening. Such detection rates are superior to the respective values of 49% (95% confidence interval, 43-55%) and 38% (34-41%) that were achieved by screening with maternal factors alone. CONCLUSION: Combination of maternal factors and biomarkers provides effective first-trimester screening for preterm-preeclampsia.

Clinico-pathological study of cervical polyps.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of malignancy in cervical polyps and determine the effect of age and parity on clinical presentation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of histological diagnosis and demographic information relating to 294 polyps was undertaken. Comparison was made between premenopausal and postmenopausal women as well as women with and without recurrent polyps. RESULTS: There was no case of malignancy. Majority of the women were parous (71.8%), asymptomatic (65.9%) and had their polyps removed in the outpatient setting (69.9%). The recurrence rate was 12.6%. The predominant symptom was IMB/PCB. Women with recurrent polyps were 10 times more likely to be parous (OR = 10.1, 95% CI 1.4-74.8), 7.9 times more likely to have symptoms (OR = 7.9, 95% CI 3.5-17.1) and 4.8 times more likely to have polyps removed under general anaesthesia (OR = 4.8, 95% CI 2.4-9.9). Postmenopausal women were 2.2 times more likely to have symptoms (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.6-4.7) and 1.7 times more likely to have general anaesthesia (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-3.1). CONCLUSION: Cervical polyps are mainly benign, asymptomatic lesions and recur in about 12.6% of women. They are more likely to be symptomatic in postmenopausal women.

The role of toll-like receptors (TLR-2 and -4) and triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM-1) in human term and preterm labor.

OBJECTIVE: To define the role of Toll-like receptors (TLR-2, TLR-4) and triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) in pregnant human myometrium. STUDY DESIGN: Expression of TLR-2 and -4 mRNA and protein and TREM-1 mRNA was quantified in human myometrial samples. Subsequently, we investigated the effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) as a functional inhibitor of the TLR agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS). RESULTS: Messenger RNA expression of TLR-2 and -4 was significantly higher in myometrium at term compared with preterm (P = .009 and .016, respectively). Toll-like receptor-2 protein expression was significantly higher during labor (P = .002) compared with nonlaboring samples. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 mRNA expression was increased in both myometrium and cervix after labor at term (P < .05). Medroxyprogesterone acetate significantly suppressed LPS-induced production of interleukin 1b (IL-1b), IL-6, and IL-8 in vitro (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Toll-like receptors 2and 4 and TREM-1 are expressed in human myometrium and may play a role in the mechanism of labor at term, and their functional effects are inhibited by MPA.