Workshop report: Challenges faced in developing inhalation thresholds of Toxicological Concern (TTC) - State of the science and next steps.

A challenging step in human risk assessment of chemicals is the derivation of safe thresholds. The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) concept is one option which can be used for the safety evaluation of substances with a limited toxicity dataset, but for which exposure is sufficiently low. The application of the TTC is generally accepted for orally or dermally exposed cosmetic ingredients; however, these values cannot directly be applied to the inhalation route because of differences in exposure route versus oral and dermal. Various approaches of an inhalation TTC concept have been developed over recent years to address this. A virtual workshop organized by Cosmetics Europe, held in November 2020, shared the current state of the science regarding the applicability of existing inhalation TTC approaches to cosmetic ingredients. Key discussion points included the need for an inhalation TTC for local respiratory tract effects in addition to a systemic inhalation TTC, dose metrics, database building and quality of studies, definition of the chemical space and applicability domain, and classification of chemicals with different potencies. The progress made to date in deriving inhalation TTCs was highlighted, as well as the next steps envisaged to develop them further for regulatory acceptance and use.

Assessing the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of 2-chloroethanol through structure activity relationships and in vitro testing approaches.

The detection of 2-chloroethanol in foods generally follows an assumption that the pesticide ethylene oxide has been used at some stage in the supply chain. In this situation the Pesticide Residues in Food Regulation (EC) 396/2005 requires 2-chloroethanol to be assessed as if equivalent to ethylene oxide, which has been classified as a genotoxic carcinogen. This review investigated whether this is an appropriate risk assessment approach for 2-chloroethanol. This involved an assessment of existing genotoxicity and carcinogenicity data, application of Structure Activity Based Read Across for carcinogenicity assessment, biological reactivity in the ToxTracker assay and micronuclei formation in HepaRG cells. Although we identified there is an absence of a standard oral bioassay for 2-chloroethanol, carcinogenicity weight-of-evidence assessment along with data on relevant structural analogues do not show evidence for carcinogenicity for 2-chloroethanol. The absence of genotoxicity was demonstrated for 2-chloroethanol and suitable analogues. In contrast, ethylene oxide showed reactivity towards markers indicative of direct DNA damage which is consistent with what is known about its mode-of-action. These data facilitate the understanding of 2-chloroethanol and given that it is not a genotoxic carcinogen suggest it must be assessed relative to non-cancer endpoints and a health protective Reference Dose should be established on that basis.

Development of a consensus approach for botanical safety evaluation - A roundtable report.

Botanical safety science continues to evolve as new tools for risk assessment become available alongside continual desire by consumers for "natural" botanical ingredients in consumer products. Focusing on botanical food/dietary supplements a recent international roundtable meeting brought together scientists to discuss the needs, available tools, and ongoing data gaps in the botanical safety risk assessment process. Participants discussed the key elements of botanical safety evaluations. They provided perspective on the use of a decision tree methodology to conduct a robust risk assessment and concluded with alignment on a series of consensus statements. This discussion highlighted the strengths and vulnerabilities in common assumptions, and the participants shared additional perspective to ensure that this end-to-end safety approach is sufficient, actionable and timely. Critical areas and data gaps were identified as opportunities for future focus. These include, better context on history of use, systematic assessment of weight of evidence, use of in silico approaches, inclusion of threshold of toxicological concern considerations, individual substances/matrix interactions of plant constituents, assessing botanical-drug interactions and adaptations needed to apply to in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic modelling of botanical constituents.