RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Characterise the relationship between hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blood levels and the number of missed doses, accounting for dosage, dose timing and the large variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) between patients. METHODS: We externally validated a published PK model and then conducted dosing simulations. We developed a virtual population of 1000 patients for each dosage across a range of body weights and PK variability. Using the model, 10 Monte Carlo simulations for each patient were conducted to derive predicted whole blood concentrations every hour over 24 hours (240 000 HCQ levels at steady state). To determine the impact of missed doses on levels, we randomly deleted a fixed proportion of doses. RESULTS: For patients receiving HCQ 400 mg daily, simulated random blood levels <200 ng/mL were exceedingly uncommon in fully adherent patients (<0.1%). In comparison, with 80% of doses missed, approximately 60% of concentrations were <200 ng/mL. However, this cut-off was highly insensitive and would miss many instances of severe non-adherence. Average levels quickly dropped to <200 ng/mL after 2-4 days of missed doses. Additionally, mean levels decreased by 29.9% between peak and trough measurements. CONCLUSIONS: We propose an algorithm to optimally interpret HCQ blood levels and approximate the number of missed doses, incorporating the impact of dosage, dose timing and pharmacokinetic variability. No single cut-off has adequate combinations of both sensitivity and specificity, and cut-offs are dependent on the degree of targeted non-adherence. Future studies should measure trough concentrations to better identify target HCQ levels for non-adherence and efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Hidroxicloroquina , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Método de Montecarlo , Hidroxicloroquina/farmacocinética , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Hidroxicloroquina/sangre , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Antirreumáticos/farmacocinética , Antirreumáticos/sangre , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/sangre , Simulación por Computador , Modelos BiológicosRESUMEN
Background: Classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) require that antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) positivity is confirmed after at least 12 weeks. We tested the hypothesis that aPL at high titers remain positive while low titers fluctuate over time. As both platelet-bound C4d (PC4d) and aPL are associated with thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we also evaluated whether PC4d can aid in APS diagnosis. Methods: Data from serum or plasma sent to Exagen's laboratory for routine aPL testing were analyzed. Anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies (aB2GP1) were measured by chemiluminescence or ELiA fluorescence enzyme immunoassay; anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex antibodies (aPS/PT) by ELISA; PC4d by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and Pearson correlation. Results: More than 80% of positive samples with aCL and aB2GP1 at high titers - but not low titers - were positive at a retest. Non-criteria aPL (aPS/PT) followed a similar trend. aCL and aB2GP1 measured with two different technologies were highly correlated. PC4d and IgG of the three aPL were at best moderately correlated even when only positive aPL samples were analyzed (coefficient: 0.1917 to 0.2649). Conclusions: High titers aPL are often persistently positive, allowing an earlier diagnosis and risk assessment at the time of the initial screening. Conversely, a retest may be necessary for low titers. The high correlation between two methodologies suggests that these findings are independent of assay platform. The low to moderate correlation between PC4d and aPL might suggest a possible additive value to evaluate association with thrombosis in autoimmune diseases.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Antifosfolípido , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Trombosis , Anticuerpos Antifosfolípidos , Plaquetas , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex clinical diagnosis historically aided by imperfect biomarkers. The advent of a multianalyte assay panel incorporating innovative cell-bound complement activation markers necessitates a comparison of its clinical utility to conventional autoantibodies for the diagnosis and treatment of SLE. OBJECTIVES: To compare the likelihood of SLE diagnosis, SLE treatment initiation, and the downstream impact on health care utilization among patients tested with AVISE Lupus (AVISE) vs standard-of-care laboratory testing with the traditional antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing strategy cohort (tANA). METHODS: An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic health record (EHR) data from the Illumination Health registry, which integrates EHR records from more than 300 rheumatologists across the US. Health records from January 2016 to December 2020 and administrative claims with cost data for a subset of patients linkable to the HealthCore Integrated Research Database and Medicare data were analyzed. The AVISE and tANA test results were classified as positive, negative, or indeterminate, and outcomes were stratified based on test results. Two cohorts were established: AVISE testing strategy and the tANA approach. Analyses included test impact on SLE diagnosis, treatment initiation, patterns of repeat testing, and downstream health care utilization. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) comparing the likelihood of SLE medication initiation and SLE diagnosis between the AVISE and tANA cohorts. RESULTS: The main cohort included 21,827 AVISE testing episodes and 22,778 tANA testing episodes. A total of 2,437 (11.2%) patients tested positive by AVISE compared with 5,364 (23.6%) of tANA positive patients. Among patients with no baseline prescription for SLE medication(s), patients with a positive AVISE test result were more likely to initiate SLE medications compared with tANA positive patients (43% vs 32%; OR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.41-1.76). The treatment effect was larger in patients new to the practice within the preceding year (55% vs 33%; adjusted OR = 2.77; 95% CI = 2.31-3.32). AVISE positive patients were more than 5-fold more likely to be diagnosed with SLE, as compared with the tANA patients (31% vs 8%; OR = 5.11; 95% CI = 4.43-5.89), and similar in the new patient cohort (30% vs 6%; OR = 6.34; 95% CI = 5.12-7.86). Linked EHR-Medicare data revealed a greater decrease in posttest vs pretest mean annualized outpatient laboratory testing in AVISE negative (-$985; P < 0.0001) vs tANA negative (-$356; P < 0.0001) patients. A similar analysis in the EHR-HealthCore linked data revealed similar numerical trends as the Medicare data for outpatient laboratory testing but did not reach significance (P > 0.05). Cost comparisons in the categories of hospitalization, emergency department, outpatient imaging, and pharmacy costs did not yield significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly greater likelihood of SLE diagnosis and SLE medication initiation in AVISE positive vs tANA positive patients is consistent with improved clinical actionability, potentially shortening time to diagnosis. AVISE negative patients experienced a greater decrease in outpatient laboratory testing posttest relative to tANA negative patients, supporting the improved negative predictive value of AVISE vs tANA. DISCLOSURES: Mr O'Malley and Dr Zack are employed by Exagen Inc. Drs Curtis and Xie, Ms Su, and Ms Clinton are affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Mr Haechung and Dr Grabner are employees of HealthCore, Inc., which received funding from Bendcare (owner of the Illumination Health Registry) for the conduct of parts of the study on which this manuscript is based. Exagen Inc. provided funding to Bendcare for the conduct of the study. Dr Grabner is also a shareholder of Anthem, Inc.
Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Medicare , Anciano , Activación de Complemento , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between lupus severity and cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs) or low complement proteins C3 and C4. METHODS: All subjects (n=495) fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE. Abnormal CB-CAPs (erythrocyte-bound C4d or B-lymphocyte-bound C4d levels >99th percentile of healthy) and complement proteins C3 and C4 were determined using flow cytometry and turbidimetry, respectively. Lupus severity was estimated using the Lupus Severity Index (LSI). Statistical analysis consisted of multivariable linear regression and groups comparisons. RESULTS: Abnormal CB-CAPs were more prevalent than low complement values irrespective of LSI levels (62% vs 38%, respectively, p<0.0001). LSI was low (median 5.44, IQR: 4.77-6.93) in patients with no complement abnormality, intermediate in patients with abnormal CB-CAPs (median 6.09, IQR: 5.31-8.20) and high in the group presenting with both abnormal CB-CAPs and low C3 and/or C4 (median 7.85, IQR: 5.51-8.37). Odds of immunosuppressant use was higher in subjects with LSI ≥5.95 compared with subjects with LSI <5.95 (1.60 vs 0.53, p<0.0001 for both). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that higher LSI scores associated with abnormal CB-CAPs-but not low C3/C4-after adjusting for younger age, race and longer disease duration (p=0.0001), which were also independent predictors of disease severity (global R2=0.145). CONCLUSION: Abnormalities in complement activation as measured by CB-CAPs are associated with increased LSI.
Asunto(s)
Activación de Complemento/inmunología , Complemento C3/análisis , Complemento C4/análisis , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Linfocitos B/química , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Complemento C3/metabolismo , Complemento C4/metabolismo , Estudios Transversales , Eritrocitos/química , Eritrocitos/inmunología , Etnicidad , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs) as a marker of complement activation in patients with suspected systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the usefulness of this biomarker as a predictor of the evolution of probable SLE into SLE as classified by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. METHODS: Patients in whom SLE was suspected by lupus experts and who fulfilled 3 ACR classification criteria for SLE (probable SLE) were enrolled, along with patients with established SLE as classified by both the ACR and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria, patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS), and patients with other rheumatic diseases. Individual CB-CAPs were measured by flow cytometry, and positivity rates were compared to those of commonly assessed biomarkers, including serum complement proteins (C3 and C4) and autoantibodies. The frequency of a positive multianalyte assay panel (MAP), which includes CB-CAPs, was also evaluated. Probable SLE cases were followed up prospectively. RESULTS: The 92 patients with probable SLE were diagnosed more recently than the 53 patients with established SLE, and their use of antirheumatic medications was lower. At the enrollment visit, more patients with probable SLE were positive for CB-CAPs (28%) or MAP (40%) than had low complement levels (9%) (P = 0.0001 for each). In probable SLE, MAP scores of >0.8 at enrollment predicted fulfillment of a fourth ACR criterion within 18 months (hazard ratio 3.11, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Complement activation occurs in some patients with probable SLE and can be detected with higher frequency by evaluating CB-CAPs and MAP than by assessing traditional serum complement protein levels. A MAP score above 0.8 predicts transition to classifiable SLE according to ACR criteria.
Asunto(s)
Activación de Complemento/inmunología , Complemento C3/inmunología , Complemento C4b/inmunología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Fragmentos de Péptidos/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Antiproteína Citrulinada/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antinucleares/inmunología , Autoanticuerpos/inmunología , Linfocitos B/metabolismo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Complemento C4/inmunología , Complemento C4b/metabolismo , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Eritrocitos/metabolismo , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fragmentos de Péptidos/metabolismo , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/inmunología , Factor Reumatoide/inmunología , Síndrome de Sjögren/inmunología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We compared the physician-assessed diagnostic likelihood of SLE resulting from standard diagnosis laboratory testing (SDLT) to that resulting from multianalyte assay panel (MAP) with cell-bound complement activation products (MAP/CB-CAPs), which reports a two-tiered index test result having 80% sensitivity and 86% specificity for SLE. METHODS: Patients (n=145) with a history of positive antinuclear antibody status were evaluated clinically by rheumatologists and randomised to SDLT arm (tests ordered at the discretion of the rheumatologists) or to MAP/CB-CAPs testing arm. The primary endpoint was based on the change in the physician likelihood of SLE on a five-point Likert scale collected before and after testing. Changes in pharmacological treatment based on laboratory results were assessed in both arms. Statistical analysis consisted of Wilcoxon and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: At enrolment, patients randomised to SDLT (n=73, age=48±2 years, 94% females) and MAP/CB-CAPs testing arms (n=72, 50±2 years, 93% females) presented with similar pretest likelihood of SLE (1.42±0.06 vs 1.46±0.06 points, respectively; p=0.68). Post-test likelihood of SLE resulting from randomisation in the MAP/CB-CAPs testing arm was significantly lower than that resulting from randomisation to SDLT arm on review of test results (-0.44±0.10 points vs -0.19±0.07 points) and at the 12-week follow-up visit (-0.61±0.10 points vs -0.31±0.10 points) (p<0.05). Among patients randomised to the MAP/CB-CAPs testing arm, two-tiered positive test results associated significantly with initiation of prednisone (p=0.034). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that MAP/CB-CAPs testing has clinical utility in facilitating SLE diagnosis and treatment decisions.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Methotrexate (MTX) polyglutamate (MTXPG3) levels from isolated red blood cells (RBCs) collected by venipuncture have clinical utility in guiding MTX dosing for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our objective was to transition this RBC-based therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) assay to dried capillary blood collected by fingerstick. METHODS: Patients with RA treated with MTX were enrolled. Specimens were collected by fingerstick (volumetric absorptive microsampler) and venipuncture to measure MTXPG3 from dried capillary blood, total venous blood, and isolated RBCs. MTXPG3 levels from dried capillary blood were measured using LC-MS/MS, converted to RBC equivalent (nmol/L), and compared with those from isolated RBCs (reference method). Following transition to fingerstick collection, comparability in the distributions of dried capillary and venipuncture-based RBC MTXPG3 levels was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test. RESULTS: Intraday and interday precision ranged from 2.0% to 10.9% and 3.1% to 10.8%, respectively, at MTXPG3 concentrations ranging from 5 to 100 nmol/L. In 106 participants treated with MTX, MTXPG3 levels from total venous and dried capillary blood were comparable [slope = 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-1.03); R 2 = 0.92]. Dried capillary blood MTXPG3 converted to RBC equivalent was similar to levels from isolated RBCs (30 ± 18 nmol/L vs 33 ± 19 nmol/L; n = 106). After implementation in the clinical laboratory, RBC equivalents MTXPG3 from the fingerstick method were similar to levels from venipuncture [39 ± 22 nmol/L (n = 825) vs 39 ± 24 nmol/L (n = 47935)] (K-S test P = 0.09). Underexposure to MTX (MTXPG3 ≤5 nmol/L RBCs) was detected in 7.0% and 8.5% patient specimens collected using the fingerstick and venipuncture methods, respectively. CONCLUSION: Capillary blood MTXPG3 levels can be used to guide MTX dosing in TDM practice.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Metotrexato/análogos & derivados , Ácido Poliglutámico/análogos & derivados , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/métodos , Cromatografía Liquida , Recuento de Eritrocitos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/farmacología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Flebotomía , Ácido Poliglutámico/farmacología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/sangre , Espectrometría de Masas en TándemRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Low C3 and lupus anticoagulant (LAC) are known risk factors for thrombosis in SLE. We evaluated the association between C4d products deposited on platelets (PC4d) and thrombosis in SLE. Antiphosphatidyl serine/prothrombin (PS/PT) complex antibody was also evaluated as an alternative to LAC. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 149 consented patients with SLE (mean age: 47±1 years, 86% female) classified with (n=16) or without (n=133) thrombotic events in the past 5 years. Abnormal PC4d (≥20 units) was measured using flow cytometry. LAC and C3 were measured using dilute Russell's viper venom time (>37 s) and immunoturbidimetry, respectively. Anti-PS/PT antibody status (IgG) was measured by immunoassay. Statistical analysis consisted of logistic regression and calculation of OR estimates with 95% CI. RESULTS: Abnormal PC4d (OR=8.4, 95% CI 2.8 to 24.8), low C3 (OR=9.5, 95% CI 3.0 to 30.3), LAC (OR=5.4, 95% CI 1.3 to 22.3) and anti-PS/PT IgG (OR=3.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 9.7) status associated with thrombosis (p<0.05). Cumulatively, the presence of PC4d, low C3 and LAC abnormalities as a composite risk score was higher in the presence of thrombosis (1.93±0.25) than in its absence (0.81±0.06) (p<0.01). Each unit of this composite risk score yielded an OR of 5.2 (95% CI 2.5 to 10.7) to have thrombosis (p<0.01). The composite risk score with anti-PS/PT antibody status instead of LAC also associated with thrombosis (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: A composite risk score including PC4d, low C3 and LAC was associated with recent thrombosis and acknowledges the multifactorial nature of thrombosis in SLE.
RESUMEN
A novel technique for collection of capillary blood, termed volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), has been recently cleared by the FDA for collection of human blood. VAMS absorbs a fixed volume of blood (10µl) and overcomes area bias and homogeneity issues associated with dried blood spot (DBS). This study is the application of VAMS for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in human capillary blood. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) workflow for analysis of VAMS sample was developed and validated. Concentration of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and its metabolites, desethylhydroxychloroquine (DHCQ), desethylchloroquine (DCQ), and bisdesethylchloroquine (BDCQ), in capillary blood on VAMS sampler were compared to those in venous blood in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Feasibility of capillary blood collected on both VAMS and DBS card were evaluated on patients. Stability of dried capillary blood on VAMS was also examined. Our results established that VAMS is a simple and accurate sampling technique that delivers the benefits of DBS sampling while overcoming the issues associated with hematocrit and homogeneity. It requires a small blood volume, simplifies sample logistics management, and may allow sample collection in the patient's home setting.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre , Pruebas con Sangre Seca , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina , Espectrometría de Masas en TándemRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We describe the analytical validation of an assay panel intended to assist clinicians with the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The multi-analyte panel includes quantitative assessment of complement activation and measurement of autoantibodies. METHODS: The levels of the complement split product C4d bound to erythrocytes (EC4d) and B-lymphocytes (BC4d) (expressed as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI]) are measured by quantitative flow cytometry, while autoantibodies (inclusive of antinuclear and anti-double stranded DNA antibodies) are determined by immunoassays. Results of the multi-analyte panel are reported as positive or negative based on a 2-tiered index score. Post-phlebotomy stability of EC4d and BC4d in EDTA-anticoagulated blood is determined using specimens collected from patients with SLE and normal donors. Three-level C4 coated positive beads are run daily as controls. Analytical validity is reported using intra-day and inter-day coefficient of variation (CV). RESULTS: EC4d and BC4d are stable for 2days at ambient temperature and for 4days at 4°C post-phlebotomy. Median intra-day and inter-day CV range from 2.9% to 7.8% (n=30) and 7.3% to 12.4% (n=66), respectively. The 2-tiered index score is reproducible over 4 consecutive daysupon storage of blood at 4°C. A total of 2,888 three-level quality control data were collected from 6 flow cytometers with an overall failure rate below 3%. Median EC4d level is 6 net MFI (Interquartile [IQ] range 4-9 net MFI) and median BC4d is 18 net MFI (IQ range 13-27 net MFI) among 86,852 specimens submitted for testing. The incidence of 2-tiered positive test results is 13.4%. CONCLUSION: We have established the analytical validity of a multi-analyte assay panel for SLE.
Asunto(s)
Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Activación de Complemento , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antinucleares/sangre , Autoanticuerpos/aislamiento & purificación , Biomarcadores/sangre , Complemento C4b/inmunología , Complemento C4b/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fragmentos de Péptidos/inmunología , Fragmentos de Péptidos/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate different anti-double-stranded DNA assays for their performance characteristics in monitoring disease activity fluctuations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: 36 active SLE patients were followed monthly. At each study visit (total n = 371), blood was collected and disease activity was scored using the SELENA-SLEDAI (excluding anti-dsDNA or complement components) and by a physician's global assessment (PGA). Four anti-dsDNA tests were compared. Linear mixed-effects models with random intercept and fixed slopes were used to evaluate the relationship between the longitudinal fluctuations of disease activity and anti-dsDNA titers. RESULTS: At enrollment, positivity for QUANTA Lite and high-avidity anti-dsDNA assay was both 64% and significantly lower than anti-dsDNA positivity by QUANTA Flash (83%) and CLIFT (96%). Linear mixed-effects modeling indicated that the change in clinical SELENA-SLEDAI scores was associated with the titers of all anti-dsDNA with QUANTA Flash yielding the highest marginal R2 (0.15; p < 0.01). QUANTA Flash was the only anti-dsDNA assay significantly associated with the change in PGA (marginal R2 = 0.05; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that anti-dsDNA antibodies determined by QUANTA Flash have a value in monitoring SLE disease activity.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antinucleares/sangre , ADN/inmunología , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Afinidad de Anticuerpos , Simulación por Computador , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Inmunoensayo/instrumentación , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance characteristics of cell-bound complement (C4d) activation products (CBCAPS) on erythrocyte (EC4d) and B cells (BC4d) with antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and complement C3 and C4 in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: The study enrolled 794 subjects consisting of 304 SLE and a control group consisting of 285 patients with other rheumatic diseases and 205 normal individuals. Anti-dsDNA and other autoantibodies were measured using solid-phase immunoassays while EC4d and BC4d were determined using flow cytometry. Complement proteins were determined using immunoturbidimetry. Disease activity in SLE was determined using a non-serological Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index SELENA Modification. A two-tiered methodology combining CBCAPS with autoantibodies to cellular and citrullinated antigens was also developed. Statistical analyses used area under receiver operating characteristic curves and calculations of area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: AUC for EC4d (0.82±0.02) and BC4d (0.84±0.02) was higher than those yielded by C3 (0.73±0.02) and C4 (0.72±0.02) (p<0.01). AUC for CBCAPS was also higher than the AUC yielded by anti-dsDNA (0.79±0.02), but significance was only achieved for BC4d (p<0.01). The combination of EC4d and BC4d in multivariate testing methodology with anti-dsDNA and autoantibodies to cellular and citrullinated antigens yielded 80% sensitivity for SLE and specificity ranging from 70% (Sjogren's syndrome) to 92% (rheumatoid arthritis) (98% vs. normal). A higher proportion of patients with SLE with higher levels of disease activity tested positive for elevated CBCAPS, reduced complement and anti-dsDNA (p<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: CBCAPS have higher sensitivity than standard complement and anti-dsDNA measurements, and may help with the differential diagnosis of SLE in combination with other autoantibodies.