First-Generation Low-Income Individuals in Medicine: A Scoping Review.

PURPOSE: This comprehensive scoping review of the medical literature on first-generation low-income (FGLI) individuals in medicine aimed to synthesize the highest levels of evidence to inform medical education stakeholders. METHOD: Database searches were conducted in Academic Search Premier, Education Research Premier, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Professional Development Collection, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science Core Collection from database inception through March 15, 2023. English-language articles on first-generation or low-income individuals in medicine from U.S. medical schools were included. Articles were evaluated for level of evidence and themes chosen. RESULTS: Database searches resulted in 27,075 citations, 247 of which qualified for data extraction. The articles were classified by evidence level: level I (n = 2), level II (n = 17), level III (n = 90), level IV (n = 78), and level V (n = 60). Publications reported on 9 major outcomes: exam performance (n = 108), medical school performance (n = 63), residency and fellowship performance (n = 7), honor society status (n = 12), leave of absence (n = 9), withdrawal, dismissal, and attrition (n = 20), medical education graduation (n = 37), career choice (n = 109), and intent to practice in disadvantaged and rural communities (n = 60). Compared with their peers, FGLI individuals had lower medical school and standardized exam scores, enrollment in national medical honor societies and multiple degree programs, and graduate medical education performance and higher rates of leaves of absence, incompletion of medical education, pursuing primary care and family medicine specialties, and intent to practice in underserved communities. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in the number of FGLI individuals in medicine, there remains significant opportunity to improve their inclusion and support. Multi-institutional, prospective, risk-adjusted, observational studies are required to determine how to best support FGLI individuals through all medical career stages.

The Current State of International Academic Partnerships in Orthopaedic Surgery Between High-Income and Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Background: Orthopaedic academic partnerships between high-income countries (HICs) and low and middle-income countries (LMICs) are an effective method to increase research and scholarly support. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic literature review of the current state of partnerships worldwide and assess the quality, quantity, and content of their research output. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using 4 academic databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. Article eligibility criteria included articles published between January 2017 and 2022, with orthopaedic authors from at least 1 HIC and LMIC. Articles related to global orthopaedic surgery with exclusively HIC or LMIC authors were excluded. Results: The database search yielded 25,928 articles, and after deduplication, 21,145 articles were included in the screening. After title and abstract screening, 408 articles underwent full-text review for eligibility. The final list of eligible articles for extraction included 310 publications in 127 journals. Published articles increased over time (46 in 2017 to 88 in 2021) and were most commonly published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (20, 6.5%). Open-access articles (203, 65.5%) had a significantly greater Journal Citation Indicator (p = 0.024) than non-open-access articles. Most studies (40.7%) were observational, with few (3.6%) randomized controlled trials. Orthopaedic trauma (38.1%) was the most common subspecialty, followed by spine (14.8%) and pediatrics (14.2%). Most partnerships were sponsored by North American authors in 65 LMICs, primarily China, India, and the sub-Saharan African region. Conclusion: This study identified 310 articles published by orthopaedic international academic partnerships in 106 countries over the past 5 years, demonstrating that collaborations between LMIC/HIC partners nearly doubled over the study period. Sixty-five percent of the articles were published in open-access journals.

National trends in musculoskeletal urgent care centers: Improved Medicaid access from 2019 to 2023.

Musculoskeletal urgent care centers (MUCCs) are an increasingly common alternative to emergency departments for patients with orthopedic injuries. As there is a lack of longitudinal data regarding MUCCs' impact on the emergency health care system, our study seeks to understand recent trends in MUCC growth and their acceptance of Medicaid insurance. Over the last 6 years, at 2-year intervals (2019, 2021, and 2023), we performed a search to identify all MUCCs in the United States. We determined the affiliation and Medicaid acceptance status of all MUCCs, including those that closed/opened between 2019, 2021, and 2023, to analyze trends in MUCC availability and Medicaid acceptance. In 2019, there were 558 MUCCs, which increased to 596 MUCCs in 2021 and then decreased to 555 MUCCs in 2023, representing a growth and then decline of approximately 7%. Overall, since June 2019, 90 MUCCs have opened and 95 MUCCs have closed. Medicaid acceptance increased nationally between 2019 and 2023, from 58% to 71%. Medicaid acceptance increased for both nonaffiliated and privately affiliated MUCCs. Medicaid acceptance has increased nationally from 2019 to 2023, while MUCC availability has gone through a period of growth and then reversion to 2019 levels. As MUCCs have demonstrated limited Medicaid acceptance previously, it is promising that Medicaid acceptance has improved and MUCCs are providing patients with an additional avenue to access orthopedic care.

Critical elements of international academic partnerships in orthopaedic surgery: a modified Delphi approach.

Background: Despite the recent emphasis on promoting international collaborations within orthopaedic surgery, criteria for determining the strengths of such partnerships has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate orthopaedic experts' perceptions of the most valuable characteristics of international academic partnerships. Methods: This study was conducted using a modified Delphi methodology. Experts were identified through the Consortium of Orthopaedic Academic Traumatologists (COACT). Responses were collected from February to September 2022. Three rounds of surveys listing possible topics on a 5-point Likert scale were used to develop consensus among a group of experts. Consensus criteria for topic inclusion in the final scale was determined as a rating of "strongly agree" or "agree" by ≥70% of the participants in the third survey. Results: The Round 1 survey was distributed to 96 invited participants within the COACT network, of which 50 experts (52.1%) completed the first survey. Consensus was reached on 54 topics organized into the following 5 categories: Research, Advocacy/Leadership, Training/Surgical Skills, Education/Knowledge Exchange, and Sustainability and Safety (RATES Criteria). Conclusions: Determining the most valuable characteristics of successful international academic partnerships can lead to more sustainable, mutually beneficial collaborations. The criteria identified in this study can provide the foundation for developing new partnerships and assessing existing ones.

The economic impact of infection and/or nonunion on long-bone shaft fractures: a systematic review.

Background: Long-bone fractures are a major cause of morbidity worldwide. These injuries are often complicated by infection or nonunion, which significantly affect patient quality of life and economic costs. Although studies have quantified the impact of these fractures, there is not a comprehensive review summarizing their economic and lifestyle costs. Study Objective: This review summarized the impact of long-bone fracture infection and nonunion on health-related quality of life, as measured by utility scores, and both direct and indirect economic costs. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The search included terms related to long-bone fractures, infection, nonunion, cost, and utility. The search yielded 1267 articles, and after deduplication, 1144 were screened, yielding 116 articles for full-text review. Screening was conducted using Covidence and extraction using REDCap. Results: Twenty-two articles met inclusion criteria, with the majority being from the United States and Europe. Most articles were retrospective studies, predominantly regarding the tibia. Fifteen articles contained cost data and 8 contained utility data, with 1 article containing both. Ten cost articles and 1 utility article contained infection data. 8 cost and all utility articles contained nonunion data. Infection ranged from 1.5 to 8.0 times the cost of an uncomplicated fracture. Nonunion ranged from 2.6 to 4.3 times the cost of an uncomplicated fracture. Utility data were variable and ranged from 0.62 to 0.66 for infection and 0.48-0.85 for nonunion. Conclusions: Infection and nonunion after long-bone fractures are associated with large decreases in health-related quality of life and incur substantial costs to both patients and health care systems. The data presented in this review quantify these impacts and may serve useful for future economic analyses. In addition, this study highlights the dearth of high-quality literature on this important topic.

An Analysis of Participant Preferences Regarding Virtual Versus In-person Format of Orthopaedic Surgery Educational Materials in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

INTRODUCTION: The University of California, San Francisco Institute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology Surgical Management and Reconstructive Training (SMART) course has instructed orthopaedic surgeons from low-resource countries on soft-tissue reconstruction. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the course was conducted in-person; however, it was transitioned to a virtual format during the pandemic. The aim of this study was to determine participant preferences regarding a virtual or in-person SMART course format. METHODS: Survey data were collected via e-mail after each SMART course using RedCap or Qualtrics. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata. RESULTS: There were 247 survey respondents from 44 countries representing all world regions, with Africa (125, 51%) the most represented. Of those who attended both an in-person and virtual course, most (82%) preferred the in-person format. In addition, all measured course outcomes were significantly better for participants attending the in-person course. The most common reason for not attending an in-person course was the cost of travel (38, 51%). DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated a preference toward in-person learning for the SMART course. In addition, those surgeons participating in the in-person course endorsed increased positive outcomes from the course. Increased emphasis should be placed on in-person surgical skills training for low-resource surgeons.

Moral foundations and HPV vaccine acceptance in the United States: State, parental, and individual factors.

RATIONALE: Appeals to intuitive morality may present a novel approach to addressing vaccine hesitancy. OBJECTIVE: To better understand the relationship between morality and vaccination by employing Moral Foundations Theory to studies surrounding the HPV vaccination at multiple different levels of decision making. METHOD: We employed three different study modalities which examined moralities link to vaccination by employing Moral Foundations Theory. A state-wide ecological study aimed to understand population level trends. Two randomized control interventional studies were then created to understand the effects of Moral Foundations Theory based interventions on both parents of children and individual decision makers. RESULTS: We demonstrated a negative association at the state level between the purity moral foundations and HPV vaccination rates (ß = -.75, SE 0.23; p < .01) and a positive association between loyalty and HPV vaccination rates (ß = 0.62 SE 0.24; p < .05). The parental study built upon this by demonstrating negative association between higher moral purity scores and attitudes towards the HPV vaccine and intention to vaccinate their children (ß = -0.27 SE 0.07; p < .001). Our final study demonstrated a Moral Foundations Theory based intervention was associated with an increase in the odds of indicating an intention to receive the HPV vaccination (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 2.59, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.62-4.14). This equates to a 20% increase in the predicted probability of the intention to receive an HPV vaccine (39% CI (36%-42%) vs 60% CI (57%-63%). CONCLUSIONS: Together, these studies demonstrate that moral foundations, specifically the purity foundation, appear to have a strong and consistent relationship with HPV vaccination. They also demonstrate the how moral values-based interventions may serve as a novel approach to increase HPV vaccine uptake with potential to be employed to target vaccine hesitancy more broadly.

Best Practices for Developing International Academic Partnerships in Orthopaedics.

ABSTRACT: Traumatic and nontraumatic orthopaedic conditions are major contributors to global morbidity and account for the majority of life-years lived with disability worldwide. Additionally, the burden of musculoskeletal injuries has increased substantially over the past 3 decades. Unfortunately, in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), access to orthopaedic care is limited, leading to a disproportionate burden of disease. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery has emphasized the urgent need for unified international commitment and research collaboration to achieve universal access to safe and affordable surgical care. However, conducting high-quality orthopaedic research in LMICs remains challenging as a result of disparities in training, access to resources, infrastructure, and equipment availability. Partnerships between high-income countries (HICs) and LMICs have emerged in recent decades as an effective approach to combatting some of these challenges. These partnerships aim to bridge the gaps by facilitating collaborative research and knowledge exchange. The establishment of successful partnerships requires a collaborative and reciprocal approach that starts with a clear understanding of mutual research aims and the availability of resources. Despite the potential benefits, various factors can make establishing such partnerships difficult. However, these partnerships can have a substantial impact in delivering quality orthopaedic education and research training, thus improving access to care in resource-limited environments. This paper represents the collaborative effort of multiple international academic orthopaedic surgeons with extensive experience in HIC-LMIC partnerships. Our aims were to outline the best practices for conducting orthopaedic research within these relationships and to provide guidance for future successful collaborations.

A pilot, masked, randomized controlled trial to evaluate local gentamicin versus saline in open tibial fractures (pGO-Tibia).

Background: Open tibial fractures have a high risk of infection that can lead to severe morbidity. Antibiotics administered locally at the site of the open wound are a potentially effective preventive measure, but there are limited data evaluating aminoglycoside antibiotics. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of a clinical trial to test the efficacy of local gentamicin in reducing the risk of fracture-related infection after open tibial fracture. Methods: This study is a single-center, pilot, masked, randomized controlled trial conducted at the Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute. Participants were randomized intraoperatively after wound closure to receive gentamicin solution or normal saline solution injected at the fracture site. Follow-ups were completed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The primary feasibility outcomes were the rate of enrollment and retention. The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of fracture-related infection. Results: Of 199 patients screened, 100 eligible patients were successfully enrolled and randomized over 9 months (11.1 patients/month). Complete data were recorded at baseline and follow-up for >95% of cases. The rate of follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year were 70%, 68%, 69%, 61%, and 80%, respectively. There was no difference in adverse events or any of the measured primary and secondary outcomes. Conclusion: This pilot study is among the first to evaluate locally administered gentamicin in open tibial fractures. Results indicate a rigorous clinical trial with acceptable rates of enrollment and follow-up to address this topic is possible in this setting.

Deciphering data: How should clinical trials change your clinical practice?

INTRODUCTION: The careful consideration of how to apply findings from the scientific literature is important to every physician's clinical practice. This can pose a difficult task, particularly with the increasing speed of technological advances and complexity involved in modern clinical trials. This review introduces a new method, the WHOM criteria (Who, How, Outcomes, Minimizing bias), from which orthopedic surgeons and other physicians can efficiently evaluate novel medical literature for inclusion into their clinical practice. WHOM CRITERIA: The WHOM framework consists of four steps. The first step, Who, involves confirming whether a sample population studied is similar to one's patient under treatment, in order to ensure the results can be reasonably applied. Second, the How, comprises evaluating the intervention performed and ensuring that it could be reasonably replicated. The third step requires thoroughly evaluating the outcomes used in the study so as to ensure they are clinically meaningful to both the treating physician and the patient. Finally, there must be a careful evaluation of potential sources of bias and the ways in which errors and bias were minimized in all phases of the study. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based practice should drive clinical decision making whenever the necessary literature is available. This requires the careful evaluation of new literature on a regular basis so that physicians can render safe and effective health care in partnership with their patients. The WHOM criteria are described in order to aid clinicians in navigating published research and change practice when appropriate.

GO-Tibia: a masked, randomized control trial evaluating gentamicin versus saline in open tibia fractures.

BACKGROUND: The rate of open tibia fractures is rapidly increasing across the globe due to a recent rise in road traffic accidents, predominantly in low- and low-middle-income countries. These injuries are orthopedic emergencies associated with infection rates as high as 40% despite the use of systemic antibiotics and surgical debridement. The use of local antibiotics has shown some promise in reducing the burden of infection in these injuries due to increasing local tissue availability; however, no trial has yet been appropriately powered to evaluate for definitive evidence and the majority of current studies have taken place in a high-resource countries where resources and the bio-burden may be different. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized, masked, placebo-controlled superiority trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of locally administered gentamicin versus placebo in the prevention of fracture-related infection in adults (age > 18 years) with primarily closeable Gustillo-Anderson class I, II, and IIIA open tibia fractures. Eight hundred ninety patients will be randomized to receive an injection of either gentamicin (treatment group) or saline (control group) at the site of their primarily closed open fracture. The primary outcome will be the occurrence of a fracture-related infection occurring during the course of the 12-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: This study will definitively assess the effectiveness of local gentamicin for the prevention of fracture-related infections in adults with open tibia fractures in Tanzania. The results of this study have the potential to demonstrate a low-cost, widely available intervention for the reduction of infection in open tibia fractures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05157126. Registered on December 14, 2021.

The Dimeglio Olecranon Method Is Reliable in Diverse, Contemporary Patients for Predicting Future Growth.

BACKGROUND: Growth assessment, which relies on a combination of radiographic and clinical markers, is an integral part of clinical decision-making in pediatric orthopaedics. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Diméglio skeletal age system using a modern cohort of pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients at a large tertiary pediatric hospital who had lateral forearm radiographs (before the age of 14 y for females and before 16 y for males). In addition, all of these patients had height measurements within 60 days of their forearm x-ray and a final height listed in their medical records. The x-rays were graded by 5 reviewers according to the Diméglio skeletal age system. Inter and intraobserver reliability was tested. RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven patients with complete radiographs and height data were evaluated by 5 observers ranging in experience from medical students to senior pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. The Diméglio system demonstrated excellent reliability across levels of training with an intraobserver correlation coefficient of 0.995 (95% CI, 0.991-0.997) and an interobserver correlation coefficient of 0.906 (95% CI, 0.857-0.943). When the Diméglio stage was paired with age and sex in a multivariable linear regression model predicting the percent of final height, the adjusted R2 was 78.7% (model P value <0.001), suggesting a strong relationship between the Diméglio stage (plus age and sex) and percent of final height. CONCLUSION: This unique approach to maturity assessment demonstrates that the Diméglio staging system can be used effectively in a modern, diverse patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II; retrospective cohort study.

Perceptions on Burnout and the Medical School Learning Environment of Medical Students Who Are Underrepresented in Medicine.

Importance: Burnout is a highly prevalent issue among medical trainees, but there has been limited research characterizing burnout specifically among medical students from groups who are underrepresented in medicine (URIM). Objective: To assess the association between components of the medical school learning environment and burnout among medical students who are URIM vs those who are not. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional survey study evaluated responses of allopathic medical students graduating from all US allopathic medical schools in 2016 and 2017 to the American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire. Analysis was completed between December 1, 2019, and July 1, 2020. Exposures: Self-identification as a medical student who is URIM. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported measures of medical student overall, disengagement, and exhaustion-related burnout using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory for Medical Students. Results: The American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire had an 81% response rate, yielding 26 567 complete participant responses that were included the analysis. A total of 13 645 individuals (51.4%) were male, and 3947 (14.9%) identified as URIM (ie, Alaska Native, Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Native American, and/or Pacific Islander). Medical students who are URIM reported modestly higher levels of exhaustion-related burnout (mean [SD], 11.84 [3.62] vs 11.48 [3.61]; P < .001) and modestly lower mean burnout scores associated with disengagement (mean [SD], 9.24 [3.56] vs 9.36 [3.58]; P = .047). Medical students who are URIM also reported marginally less favorable student-faculty interactions in the learning environment (mean [SD], 14.09 [3.45] vs 14.29 [3.35]; P < .001). Medical students who are URIM were more likely to be in the top quartile of those who experienced exhaustion-related burnout (odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.09-1.29]) but less likely to be in the top quartile for disengagement (odds ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.80-0.94]). Regardless of URIM status, those who reported learning environment scores in the bottom quartile were more likely to experience higher rates of burnout as were those who experienced at least 1 episode of discrimination. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that medical students who are URIM had a higher risk for exhaustion-related burnout. This burnout is likely multifactorial and could represent a resiliency or survival bias, the burden of increased responsibility, and/or recurrent discrimination. The learning environment can play a key role in mitigating burnout in both medical students who are URIM and those who are not and is deserving of further research.

Evaluation of MRSA Surveillance Nasal Swabs for Predicting MRSA Infection in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the clinical value of serial MRSA surveillance cultures to rule out a MRSA diagnosis on subsequent cultures during a patient's surgical intensive care unit (SICU) admission. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate patients who received a MRSA surveillance culture at admission to the SICU (n = 6,915) and collected and assessed all patient cultures for MRSA positivity during their admission. The primary objective was to evaluate the transition from a MRSA negative surveillance on admission to MRSA positive on any subsequent culture during a patient's SICU stay. Percent of MRSA positive cultures by type following MRSA negative surveillance cultures was further analyzed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 6,303 patients received MRSA nasal surveillance cultures at admission with 21,597 clinical cultures and 7,269 MRSA surveillance cultures. Of the 6,163 patients with an initial negative, 53 patients (0.87%) transitioned to MRSA positive. Of the 139 patients with an initial positive, 30 (21.6%) had subsequent MRSA positive cultures. Individuals who had an initial MRSA surveillance positive status on admission predicted MRSA positivity rates for cultures in qualitative lower respiratory cultures (64.3% versus. 3.1%), superficial wound (60.0% versus 1.6%), deep wound (39.0% versus 0.8%), tissue culture (26.3% versus 0.6%), and body fluid (20.8% versus 0.7%) cultures when compared to MRSA negative patients on admission. CONCLUSION: Following MRSA negative nasal surveillance cultures patients showed low likelihood of MRSA infection suggesting empiric anti-MRSA treatment is unnecessary for specific patient populations. SICU patient's MRSA status at admission should guide empiric anti-MRSA therapy.