Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 132(7): 927-36, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22402769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Epoca-Reconstruction-(Reco)®-Glenoid has been developed to treat patients with cuff-tear-arthropathy. The glenoid component of this system has a hemispheric shape that canopies the humeral head. This design is believed to provide a stable fulcrum and restore normal deltoid function. The purpose of this study was to analyse strengths and disadvantages of the Epoca-Reco®-Glenoid in cuff-tear-arthropathy patients. Changes in functional outcome using Constant-Murley-Scoring(CMS), CMS sub-scoring parameters and radiological outcome were analysed. For this purpose, a classification for radiologic lucency was proposed. Diverging results, influencing factors and alternative treatment options have been discussed to analyse weaknesses and enhance future development of this arthroplastic model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 23 patients aged 68 ± 8.4 years with irreparable cuff-tear-arthropathy refractory to physiotherapeutic treatment were treated with Reco-Glenoid Total-Shoulder-Arthroplasty (TSA). Pre-operative standardized evaluations included history, physical examination, radiographs, computer tomography and clinical scorings. The post-operative controls included physical examination with CMS, video documentation and radiological evaluation. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 38 ± 18 months, the CMS had been significantly improved (p < 0.001) from (17.4 ± 5.8) to (43.2 ± 19.2) points. Significant improvement in pain, activities of daily life, range of motion (p < 0.001) and power (p = 0.006) was achieved. Significantly, inferior results in functional outcome and higher lucency rates were observed in female patients and in patients treated with small glenoid components. The follow-up rate was 100 %. CONCLUSION: The semi-constraint reconstruction glenoid prosthesis model in cuff-tear-arthropathy patients significantly improves shoulder function, however, it yields controversial results, with satisfactory results in male and poor results in female patients. Revision rate of the female cohort and loosening of the glenoid component in this short-term follow-up is of concern. Further investigations taking BMD, osteopenic conditions and influence of surface area in smaller individuals into consideration are recommended, to determine whether this is the underlying cause of the inferior results in females.


Asunto(s)
Artritis/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/instrumentación , Cavidad Glenoidea , Prótesis Articulares , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores , Traumatismos de los Tendones/cirugía , Anciano , Artritis/etiología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recuperación de la Función , Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Factores Sexuales , Traumatismos de los Tendones/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Arthroscopy ; 27(10): 1323-8, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21868190

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) block in pain reduction after arthroscopic subacromial decompression operations and its influence on patient satisfaction. Furthermore, we wanted to evaluate whether better perioperative pain management could positively influence postoperative shoulder function. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial, 3 groups of patients--each with 15 participants--were treated with SSN block (10 mL of 1% ropivacaine), placebo, or a subacromial infiltration of local anesthesia (20 mL of 1% ropivacaine). Preoperative and postoperative pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale. Functional outcome was measured by the Constant-Murley score, and patient satisfaction was measured anecdotally by interview 2 days, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: The SSN group reported significantly lower levels of postoperative pain, required significantly less analgesia, had better range of motion, and had higher levels of postoperative satisfaction in comparison to the subacromial infiltration group and placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with SSN blocks had less pain overall, which led to a decreased need for analgesics in comparison to the subacromial infiltration and placebo groups. Furthermore, patients in the SSN-blocked group achieved better postoperative ROM and were significantly more satisfied after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Artroscopía/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Bloqueo Nervioso , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Satisfacción del Paciente , Síndrome de Abducción Dolorosa del Hombro/cirugía , Dolor de Hombro/prevención & control , Anciano , Amidas , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locales , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Ropivacaína , Dolor de Hombro/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Injury ; 42(4): 324-9, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20394920

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) of displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures is a minimally invasive technique which was reported to be an easy procedure with low complication rates, good cosmetic and functional results, restoration of clavicular length and fast return to daily activities. Recent studies, however, also report on higher complication rates and specific problems with the use of this technique. This prospective study compares ESIN with non-operative treatment of displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures. METHODS: Between December 2003 and August 2007, 120 patients volunteered to participate. Of these, 112 patients completed the study (60 in the operative and 52 in the non-operative group). Patients in the non-operative group were treated with a simple shoulder sling. In the operative group, intramedullary stabilisation was performed within 3 days of the trauma. Clavicular shortening was determined after trauma and after osseous consolidation on thorax posteroanterior radiographs as the proportional length difference between the left and right side with the uninjured side serving as a control for clavicular length (100%). Radiographic union was assessed every 4 weeks on 20 degrees cephalad anteroposterior and posteroanterior radiographs of the clavicle. Constant shoulder scores and DASH scores (DASH, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) were assessed at final follow-up after 2 years. RESULTS: ESIN led to faster osseous healing and better restoration of clavicular length in simple fractures. We were not able to restore clavicular length in comminuted fractures using ESIN. Functional outcome at a mean follow-up of 24 months (range: 22-27 months) was better in the operative group. Delayed union and non-union accounted for the majority of complications in the non-operative group. In the operative group, telescoping was the main complication, which occurred in complex fractures with severe post-traumatic shortening only. CONCLUSION: We recommend ESIN for all simple displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures in order to minimise the rate of delayed union, non-union and symptomatic mal-union. We also recommend ESIN in comminuted fractures with moderate (< or = 7%) post-traumatic shortening, as they will heal with moderate shortening. In comminuted fractures with severe shortening, however, we recommend plate osteosynthesis in order to provide for stability, clavicular length and endosteal blood supply.


Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Clavícula/lesiones , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
4.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 129(6): 807-15, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18989685

RESUMEN

Fractures of the clavicle are common and have been typically addressed to nonoperative treatment. Favorable results, which predominantly were achieved in the young and adolescents, were supposed to be usual in midshaft clavicular fractures. However, in the presence of comminution or complete displacement, especially when occurring in females or elderly patients, there is a marked risk of nonunion, malunion, and poor outcome. Thus, many authors prefer primary surgical stabilization, when risk factors add up. Plate fixation and intramedullary stabilization seem to be equally favored. Though, indications for operative management remain controversial. Further prospective randomized comparative clinical trials are necessary for a well-founded risk-benefit analysis.


Asunto(s)
Clavícula/lesiones , Fracturas Cerradas/cirugía , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Fracturas Mal Unidas/cirugía , Fracturas no Consolidadas/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Clavícula/diagnóstico por imagen , Clavícula/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Fracturas Cerradas/clasificación , Fracturas Cerradas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Cerradas/epidemiología , Fracturas Conminutas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Conminutas/epidemiología , Fracturas Mal Unidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Mal Unidas/epidemiología , Fracturas no Consolidadas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas no Consolidadas/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...